Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
Clams Canino wrote: Unfortunately the lack of background does not stop her basic research from being more correct than not on a theoretical / technical level. The DFI motors do have some inherant lean burn issues. Issues that have been sucessfully "worked around" by throwing more electronics and technology at them, but still loom over the design concept as a whole. The fact that there are plenty of Yamaha and Merc DFIs around and running well, and that the Evinrude whatever the hell they called now selling well and running well speaks for itself. There are dozens and dozens and dozens of these engines powering the fishing boats leaving the marina where I keep Yo Ho, and I see these guys several times a week and talk to them. These high tech two strokes seem to be causing them no more trouble than the four cycle Yamahas and Suzukis of similar horsepower some of their friends have. Are you just a simpleton Krause or can't you stop yourself lying?? It was your pension fund that backed Soros with unionists' retirement money!!! Have you not noticed that Ficht ****ed US$1.3 billion, that billion against the wall. This was during the biggest consumer spending spree in history!!! Dozens are OK so what?? 1 in 5 failed that was admitted & since then they've never admitted the failure rate again & they won't with this latest E-tec try. Technology is evolving, eh? You build something as best you can, you test it, and if some units fail, you improve what you are doing and produced refined product, and that's how the process works. This is technology that is known not to work, lean mixtures make heat then cause detonation. I don't expect you to have any understanding whatsoever but this "is" rocket science. If you have a burn in a closed chamber such that you cause a significant pressure rise, then it's very difficult to ensure that burn progresses in a predictable manner. If the mixture is too lean then ignition will be spasmodic & the flame front slow, if the mixture is too rich the burn will be at too low a temp, very dirty & use way too much fuel. Either side of those two, too lean or too rich & it just doesn't ignite at all. Even the shuttle only went closed loop very recently, before that it was all done on calculating the pressures, temps, etc etc & programing the oxygen & fuel amounts accordingly. They were & some still are experimenting to discover what everyone has known since the 1930s & they're using consumers money. I would expect that next year's four cycle Yamaha 225 would be more refined than my 2003 model. And I haven't had any problems with my 2003 model. Ah more lies you don't own a boat Krause & never have & never will, you are just a liar. K |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
2004 9.9 Mercury - 2 stroke or 4 stroke? | General | |||
Need a new 2-4 hp outboard - must be 2 stroke - what's available outside California | Cruising | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General | |||
4 stroke produces more "thrust"???? | General |