Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:23:19 +1100, "K. Smith"
wrote: ~~ snippage ~~ Sorry to be so long again, but this subject has been a war since 98 & it seems till Brunswick are all 4 stroke & E-tec has failed it will continue. Ah - now I understand the reasons for your antipathy towards FICHT. NIcely put by the way. I don't agree based on my own personal experience with FICHTS and what I know about them pre/post-OMC, but you have reasons and that's fine. It was interesting. :) I'm curious though. Your argument about diesel makes some sense - essentially, FICHT (and Etec for that matter) is diesel technology. Without going into a long treatise on the subject, I assume your contention is that FICHT is not a true two stroke and as such, problematic in the long run? Later, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
2004 9.9 Mercury - 2 stroke or 4 stroke? | General | |||
Need a new 2-4 hp outboard - must be 2 stroke - what's available outside California | Cruising | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General | |||
4 stroke produces more "thrust"???? | General |