It looks like you realize you have lost the debate and now are resorting to
personal insults concerning my sentence structure and syntax.

No dice, Doc. When you introduce the concept "Gould is an asshole....." to a
discussion you have broached a subject
over which there is little or any debate. Gould is an asshole. Operational
difference between Gould and some of the rest of the assholes here 'bouts is
that he isn't a non-boating asshole trolling through rec.boats for purposes of
picking fights with one specific poster and then expanding the mission to
include anybody who might seem slightly philosophically aligned with the
initial target.

Gould, this
is not the New Yorker. This is Usenet and it is common for people to jot
off quick retorts and they will make typos and/or grammatical errors.

It's more common for some than for others.

Sloppy grammar is a sign of intellectual sloth, at best, and wears awkwardly on
those who presume to criticize others for their deductive reasoning processes
and conclusions.

The fact still stands that you are extremely bigoted against those who have
different beliefs or values.

Naw, just against other assholes like myself. Maybe a little moreso against
intellectual weaklings who run out of ammo somewhere around the second volley
and start pitching dirty little insult turds ( an emotional payoff practice
suspected more frequently now to be the only reason they appeared to engage in
debate in the first place) rather than comparing and contrasting ideas and
perspectives.