Joe Parsons wrote:

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds" with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.

John, I *know* you can find more effective ammunition than that.

Joe Parsons


Sheesh. Most of the crap you righties post isn't worth a comment from a
razor clam. You think because no one stands up to dispute your claim
that that makes it true?

Second-best giggle of the day.




--
Email sent to is never read.

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds"
with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.


Notice: Comments unworthy of response will be neither confirmed nor denied.

On 18 Dec 2003 01:53:37 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds"
with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.


Notice: Comments unworthy of response will be neither confirmed nor denied.

Exactly. Some comments just don't warrant a response. Right now my cat is
sitting on my desk. So what?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Exactly. Some comments just don't warrant a response. Right now my cat is
sitting on my desk. So what?

So you shouldn't let you cat type messages to the newsgroup. I do suppose that
explains some of the "reasoning", however.
(evil grin)

On 18 Dec 2003 05:56:54 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Exactly. Some comments just don't warrant a response. Right now my cat is
sitting on my desk. So what?

So you shouldn't let you cat type messages to the newsgroup. I do suppose that
explains some of the "reasoning", however.
(evil grin)

The damn cat split the last infinitive I was working on, damnit!! My cat,
Huguenot, thanks you for the compliment to his reasoning.

How is the snow in Steven's Pass? I wish I could somehow 'teletransport' myself
to your neck of the woods when I wanted. Then I would have a boat on the sound.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

How is the snow in Steven's Pass? I wish I could somehow 'teletransport'
myself
to your neck of the woods when I wanted. Then I would have a boat on the
sound.

I've heard wild rumors to mountains to the east. Can't seem to get there by
boat, so I couldn't really say one way or the other.

(Actually, the ski season got started in late November.Earlier this year than
at some times in the past. Those of us who struggle to walk gracefully have no
business sliding down a slippery mountain on a couple of skinny planks- so I
don't ski.)

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:59:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Joe Parsons wrote:

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds" with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.

John, I *know* you can find more effective ammunition than that.

Joe Parsons


Sheesh. Most of the crap you righties post isn't worth a comment from a
razor clam. You think because no one stands up to dispute your claim
that that makes it true?

Harry, I can now state with complete certainty that you have absolutely no idea
what (if any) political predilection I might have.

Joe Parsons


Second-best giggle of the day.

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:59:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Joe Parsons wrote:

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds" with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.

John, I *know* you can find more effective ammunition than that.

Joe Parsons


Sheesh. Most of the crap you righties post isn't worth a comment from a
razor clam. You think because no one stands up to dispute your claim
that that makes it true?

Second-best giggle of the day.

Because you used the plural, and because you left Joe's name in your follow-up,
I assume you are referring to both of us. Upon what do your base your assertion
that we are both 'righties'? What are the criteria by which you judge one to be
right or left? Do you know my position on the issues of relevance? What issues
do you consider relevant for such a judgement?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

JohnH wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:59:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Joe Parsons wrote:

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds" with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.

John, I *know* you can find more effective ammunition than that.

Joe Parsons


Sheesh. Most of the crap you righties post isn't worth a comment from a
razor clam. You think because no one stands up to dispute your claim
that that makes it true?

Second-best giggle of the day.

Because you used the plural, and because you left Joe's name in your follow-up,
I assume you are referring to both of us. Upon what do your base your assertion
that we are both 'righties'? What are the criteria by which you judge one to be
right or left? Do you know my position on the issues of relevance? What issues
do you consider relevant for such a judgement?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


You and Parsons together are about as interesting as watching a freshly
painted ceiling dry...

Beige is good, eh?




--
Email sent to is never read.

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 05:12:07 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:59:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Joe Parsons wrote:

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds" with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.

John, I *know* you can find more effective ammunition than that.

Joe Parsons


Sheesh. Most of the crap you righties post isn't worth a comment from a
razor clam. You think because no one stands up to dispute your claim
that that makes it true?

Second-best giggle of the day.

Because you used the plural, and because you left Joe's name in your follow-up,
I assume you are referring to both of us. Upon what do your base your assertion
that we are both 'righties'? What are the criteria by which you judge one to be
right or left? Do you know my position on the issues of relevance? What issues
do you consider relevant for such a judgement?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


You and Parsons together are about as interesting as watching a freshly
painted ceiling dry...

Beige is good, eh?

Solution is easy, Harry. Don't watch.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD