Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

Yup, because he's of your political persuasion, he gets a pass from you.



Go see who was the very first person to pitch him crap about posting "White
Trash Christmas" in honor of Karen, Wally, and NOYB. Suppose I hollered "foul"
because any of those three are of my political persuasion?

You cite no spicific examples where I have "apologized" for Harry, and ignore
instances where I have protested his tactics.

Very weak case.

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

Gould 0738 wrote:


Go see who was the very first person to pitch him crap about posting "White
Trash Christmas" in honor of Karen, Wally, and NOYB. Suppose I hollered "foul"
because any of those three are of my political persuasion?

You did so because krause even manages to embarrass you betimes. Doesn't
mean you don't play favorite with him because he's your favorite attack ass.


You cite no spicific examples where I have "apologized" for Harry, and ignore
instances where I have protested his tactics.

Very weak case.

Weak case in your mind, a case nevertheless. You are an enabler of an
extremely sick person who needs mental help.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

On 15 Dec 2003 04:26:53 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

"Joe" wrote in message .. .
Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Do tell, what is so funny about that? Seeing how BushCo has there
collectives heads up the collective asses of the Arabs, it should be
interesting. Funny, the arabs are amassing weapons, has much more
capability that Iraq ever had, are just as volitale, but we aren't
screwing with them. Ever wonder why?

Again, please check your punctuation, grammar, and spelling. I cannot understand
what it is you are trying to say.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

On 15 Dec 2003 04:20:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

JohnH wrote in message . ..
all the congratulatory messages from Harry, jps, basskisser, gould, et al.
our capture of Saddam. Harry, I could imagine the glee in your eyes when you
came across the video of the Iraqi getting (supposedly) murdered by a Marine
after being wounded. Yes, I would call it murder, if it occurred. I have doubts
about the authenticity of the video. For one thing, why has it not been shown on
any of the networks? Surely, if it were substantiatable, NBC, ABC, CNN, etc.
would showing it every five minutes.

The US just fined a soldier about $5000 for shooting a pistol near a man's head.
The officer is undoubtedly being forced to retire early. How do you reconcile
this action with the "inaction" for the shooting depicted in your little video.

Well guys, how do you turn this into a negative for the administration? This
should be cute.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Absolutely, congratulations on spending billions upon billions, upon
billions of taxpayer's money to find a man that posed no harm to us,
except for those pesky cardboard drones he had aimed at us!!! By the
way, news this morning says that Saddam has stated he had NO weapons
of mass destruction before the war.

If you are referring to the money of more than one taxpayer, then the correct
word is *taxpayers'*.

What did Saddam use on the Kurds?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

NOYB wrote:

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Gould 0738 wrote:

Harry can be exceptionally nasty. When he gets up a head of steam, he's
as big
a flamer as anybody.

He a sexist piece of filth, who has said he'd enjoy watching people he
doesn't like die.





When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you
right-wingers
"traitors" or anti- American?

Are you serious?


Darn right. You guys sit over in self-righteous heaven calling everybody
who
disagrees with your perspective "traitors" and etc.

I call Harry a traitor for several reasons: (a) he gloats with every bit of
bad news from the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.,


Not true. I simply work to pin the bad news on the tail of the chief
perpetrator...the Smirking Chimp. Nothing traitorous about expressing
displeasure over the idiocy of George W. Bush.


(b) he expresses "hope"
that the next terrorist attack hits middle America


Not true. I've stated that I hope there is not another attack, but that
if there is, that it strike "Bush Country," where the conservatives hold
forth.


(c) he constantly
disparages the capabilities of US troops.

They haven't faced a serious enemy since Vietnam. I have no reason to
believe they are capable against equal forces.



--
Email sent to is never read.

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

In article ,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!


I see you're easily amused. Have another hit Joe.

http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage

Go for a visit Joe, you might learn something...

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

Every other news agency refers to the troops as "US soldiers, US forces, or
coalition forces". Aljazeera constantly refers to them as "occupation
forces".

As for the protestors in Tikrit and Ramadi...
I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that those are the very same bad guys who
keeping taking pot shots at our troops. Perhaps we can have one of those
"accidental" bombings drop right in the middle of 'em.


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other
camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!


I see you're easily amused. Have another hit Joe.

http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage

Go for a visit Joe, you might learn something...

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

Aljazeera sounds an awful lot like Al Jazirah...a town in Syria that I
suspect you'll be hearing a lot more about in the near future. Can you say
"WMD's"? ;-)





"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Every other news agency refers to the troops as "US soldiers, US forces,
or
coalition forces". Aljazeera constantly refers to them as "occupation
forces".

As for the protestors in Tikrit and Ramadi...
I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that those are the very same bad guys who
keeping taking pot shots at our troops. Perhaps we can have one of those
"accidental" bombings drop right in the middle of 'em.


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other
camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!


I see you're easily amused. Have another hit Joe.

http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage

Go for a visit Joe, you might learn something...

Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
 

Aljazeera sounds an awful lot like Al Jazirah...a town in Syria that I
suspect you'll be hearing a lot more about in the near future. Can you say
"WMD's"? ;-)


After enough interrogation, Saddam Hussein will eventually be brought around to
say anything and everything the administration hopes to hear.

We'll all switch from a position that the lying ******* couldn't tell the truth
if his life depended on it to believing every syllable he utters that
exonerates our motives for invading Iraq.

They say truth is the first casualty of war.
First causualty of politics too, unfortunately.