|
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
Gould 0738 wrote: Nobody is responsible for Harry except Harry. Nope, you're implicated also as a sycophant. Stop being the apologist for this asshole. It makes you an asshole also. -- Charlie ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
Gould 0738 wrote: Wally, on the list of right wing people who seldom post anything except hate mail to the NG, you're running a distant second to some broad from "down under" something. No one compares to your left-wing hate-monger krause. Why is it that you liberals are such hypocrites? When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you right-wingers "traitors" or anti- American? Are you serious? -- Charlie ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
|
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is. LOL! |
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
Time will tell. What bothers me is those who seem to *want* an escallation of the conflict and more dead soldiers to nibble at Bush's aproval ratings. There are plenty of ways to oppose Bush without counting dead troops like trophies. -W "jps" wrote in message While I could hope this slows down the conflict I expect it'll only reinforce the anti-American sentiment in the region. |
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
WaIIy wrote:
On 14 Dec 2003 18:19:07 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: Wally, on the list of right wing people who seldom post anything except hate mail to the NG, you're running a distant second to some broad from "down under" something. "some broad" Nice turn of a phrase. Your respect for women is right along with your partner in hate. The KrauseBot © learns well. Karen Smith gets all the respect she deserves. The difference between your perspective and mine is very simple. I believe you have every right in the world to hold your opinions, (wrong as they are), and I do not consider your obviously defective opinion (insert grin here) any sort of threat to my own. When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you right-wingers "traitors" or anti- American? Duh, I think you can figure out that answer all by yourself. . Your screwed up perspective is that you, only you, and those who think exactly like you have the only valid opinions about how our society should run and what direction national policies should take. LOL You leftists are the only "true word", we all know that by now. Worry not, Wally. No one on the left wants to usurp your position as the only true dumbfoch in rec.boats. -- Email sent to is never read. |
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
Clams Canino wrote:
Time will tell. What bothers me is those who seem to *want* an escallation of the conflict and more dead soldiers to nibble at Bush's aproval ratings. There are plenty of ways to oppose Bush without counting dead troops like trophies. -W Who wants an escalation of the conflict in Iraq? I do wonder how many more body bags it will take before more Americans finally realize the idiocy of Bush's political war against Iraq. Saddam has been out of the picture as a player for many months now. Do you anticipate a drastic change in the *security* situation in Iraq? If so, why? Do you think with the capture of Saddam the attacks against American troops will cease? If so, why? Do you think the United States is any safer from international Moslem terrorists than it was before Saddam was captured? If so, why? Do you think the "show trial" of Saddam will be scheduled so as to impact the U.S. election campaigns next year? If not, why not? What do you think the impact might be of another serious and deadly Moslem terrorist attack on the U.S. before next fall's elections? Please elaborate. As I stated this morning, it is good that we've captured Saddam and can put him on trial, assuming the trial is run properly, but his capture has little to do with the terrorist threats against us. -- Email sent to is never read. |
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:briob0$3od99$1@ID- Who wants an escalation of the conflict in Iraq? Any Bush detractor with a "beat Bush at any and all costs" mentality. I do wonder how many more body bags it will take before more Americans finally realize the idiocy of Bush's political war against Iraq. Only time will tell on that one. The costs will have to weighed out against the benifits. I'm afraid only after it's all over can we assess it properly. In light of any gains or losses made. It's hard to play armchair quarterback mid-game. Saddam has been out of the picture as a player for many months now. I don't know what he has or hasn't directed. I think capturing him has to be a hell of a demotivator for his supporters though. Do you anticipate a drastic change in the *security* situation in Iraq? If so, why? See above.... though I think at first there might be an escallation by ****ed off Saddam followers. But the head of the (that) snake is gone. Do you think with the capture of Saddam the attacks against American troops will cease? If so, why? No... I think there are more forces at play than just Baathists. I hope they will slow up a bit. Do you think the United States is any safer from international Moslem terrorists than it was before Saddam was captured? If so, why? No. Unless he divulges any intelligence - if he has any. Do you think the "show trial" of Saddam will be scheduled so as to impact the U.S. election campaigns next year? If not, why not? Given the fact that the new Iraqi Govt. will take power in late June - I can't see how the trial *won't* be in the summer or fall. I'm sure Bush would *like* to see Saddam hang the on the eve of balloting though. That's politics as usual. What do you think the impact might be of another serious and deadly Moslem terrorist attack on the U.S. before next fall's elections? Please elaborate. Tough call. On one hand it could cause a "rally round the flag and the Prez" mentality. On the other hand it could look like a big failure of Tom Ridge and his boss. I'm hoping that *if* it happens again we begin a close investigation and screening of all Middle Eastern types that have been here for 10 years or less. As I stated this morning, it is good that we've captured Saddam and can put him on trial, assuming the trial is run properly, but his capture has little to do with the terrorist threats against us. I'm not sure how to run the trial "improperly"? I mean, his past crimes against humanity are public and notorious already. I could think of a few hundred thousand reasons to hang him. I just hope we get all the intel we can *out* of him before he's tried and hung. It's important that any trial held has all the trappings of fairness though. And it's important that it be run by Iraq or the UN. And IMHO the death penalty is important here to give real closure. As for the fundie terrorists - no, little impact. Only upside is that they have US targets over there to strike at. I'd rather they strike at armed US warriors than airline passengers and businessment. -W |
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...
Clams Canino wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:briob0$3od99$1@ID- Who wants an escalation of the conflict in Iraq? Any Bush detractor with a "beat Bush at any and all costs" mentality. Absurd. I want Bush beaten, and beaten badly, but I don't want to see any more people killed in Iraq, on either side. I do wonder how many more body bags it will take before more Americans finally realize the idiocy of Bush's political war against Iraq. Only time will tell on that one. The costs will have to weighed out against the benifits. I'm afraid only after it's all over can we assess it properly. In light of any gains or losses made. It's hard to play armchair quarterback mid-game. Saddam has been out of the picture as a player for many months now. I don't know what he has or hasn't directed. I think capturing him has to be a hell of a demotivator for his supporters though. Do you anticipate a drastic change in the *security* situation in Iraq? If so, why? See above.... though I think at first there might be an escallation by ****ed off Saddam followers. But the head of the (that) snake is gone. Do you think with the capture of Saddam the attacks against American troops will cease? If so, why? No... I think there are more forces at play than just Baathists. I hope they will slow up a bit. Do you think the United States is any safer from international Moslem terrorists than it was before Saddam was captured? If so, why? No. Unless he divulges any intelligence - if he has any. Do you think the "show trial" of Saddam will be scheduled so as to impact the U.S. election campaigns next year? If not, why not? Given the fact that the new Iraqi Govt. will take power in late June - I can't see how the trial *won't* be in the summer or fall. I'm sure Bush would *like* to see Saddam hang the on the eve of balloting though. That's politics as usual. What do you think the impact might be of another serious and deadly Moslem terrorist attack on the U.S. before next fall's elections? Please elaborate. Tough call. On one hand it could cause a "rally round the flag and the Prez" mentality. On the other hand it could look like a big failure of Tom Ridge and his boss. I'm hoping that *if* it happens again we begin a close investigation and screening of all Middle Eastern types that have been here for 10 years or less. As I stated this morning, it is good that we've captured Saddam and can put him on trial, assuming the trial is run properly, but his capture has little to do with the terrorist threats against us. I'm not sure how to run the trial "improperly"? I mean, his past crimes against humanity are public and notorious already. I could think of a few hundred thousand reasons to hang him. I just hope we get all the intel we can *out* of him before he's tried and hung. It's important that any trial held has all the trappings of fairness though. And it's important that it be run by Iraq or the UN. And IMHO the death penalty is important here to give real closure. As for the fundie terrorists - no, little impact. Only upside is that they have US targets over there to strike at. I'd rather they strike at armed US warriors than airline passengers and businessment. -W -- Email sent to is never read. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com