" jim--" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to
soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan.j-garofalo,west-virginia.general,rec.boats
is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals Hate America!

I'm a liberal, and I hate your *plan* for America.

People who post crap like "NAMBLA supports John Kerry on its web page"
rather
obviously hate the truth.

Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to

soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan. j-garofalo,west-virginia
..general,rec.boats

is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.

My response was a public service. Too many of your highly educated compatriots
instantly believe that any negative thing they hear about a political opponent
is the gospel truth.

I guess I see your perspective. Since the post was a lie intended to make Kerry
look
bad, it should have been allowed to stand unchallenged.

I'm sure that will be your own course of action, as Harry Krause posts
anti-Bush statements for the next few weeks.

Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans" is
grasping at straws.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to

soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan .j-garofalo,west-virginia
.general,rec.boats

is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.

My response was a public service. Too many of your highly educated
compatriots
instantly believe that any negative thing they hear about a political
opponent
is the gospel truth.

I guess I see your perspective. Since the post was a lie intended to make
Kerry
look
bad, it should have been allowed to stand unchallenged.

I'm sure that will be your own course of action, as Harry Krause posts
anti-Bush statements for the next few weeks.

Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans" is
grasping at straws.


Not so fast, Taco Flipper. *You* were the one making the case that Republicans
didn't pander to the very people who would respond to something like this. I
believe *you* said it was because the Republicans are better educated.

I did say Republicans were better educated, and I said better educated
people are more informed than non educated people. The only person who
responded to his ridiculous post was you.

I would never say ALL Republicans in reference to any subject, just as I
would never say anything about ALL liberals. Possibly if you were better
educated you would understand sets and subsets and would not have
misunderstood such an easy concept.

By the way, who started this crazy letter, and what party were they likely
to vote for?




"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans"
is
grasping at straws.


Not so fast, Taco Flipper. *You* were the one making the case that
Republicans
didn't pander to the very people who would respond to something like this.
I
believe *you* said it was because the Republicans are better educated.