((((((((((( NAMBLA supports John Kerry!!!!!! (NAMBLA ==> North American Man Boy Love Association) ))))))
 

Check it out, it is on their website,

http://216.220.97.17/

http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!

And you, sir, appear to be a lying sack of ****.

I find the organization and its principles extremely distasteful, so I didn't
spend a lot of time going from page to page to page through their web
site...but....

*THERE WAS NO MENTION OF JOHN KERRY, OR ANY OTHER POLITICAL CANDIDATE AT THE
LINKS YOU FURNISHED."

Unless you can furnish some actual evidence to back up your claim, the only
possible conclusion could be that you are a lying sack of ****.

I wonder who lying sacks of **** prefer for POTUS? Based solely on your post,
it must be someone other than John Kerry.

Another one of the better-educated Bush supporters. :-)

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Check it out, it is on their website,

http://216.220.97.17/

http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!

And you, sir, appear to be a lying sack of ****.

I find the organization and its principles extremely distasteful, so I
didn't
spend a lot of time going from page to page to page through their web
site...but....

*THERE WAS NO MENTION OF JOHN KERRY, OR ANY OTHER POLITICAL CANDIDATE AT
THE
LINKS YOU FURNISHED."

Unless you can furnish some actual evidence to back up your claim, the
only
possible conclusion could be that you are a lying sack of ****.

I wonder who lying sacks of **** prefer for POTUS? Based solely on your
post,
it must be someone other than John Kerry.

Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to
soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan.j-garofalo,west-virginia.general,rec.boats
is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals Hate America!

I'm a liberal, and I hate your *plan* for America.

People who post crap like "NAMBLA supports John Kerry on its web page"
rather
obviously hate the truth.

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:11:05 -0400, " jim--" wrote:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.



Personally, I am going to vote for Kerry before I vote against him.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Check it out, it is on their website,

http://216.220.97.17/

http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!

And you, sir, appear to be a lying sack of ****.

I find the organization and its principles extremely distasteful, so I
didn't
spend a lot of time going from page to page to page through their web
site...but....

*THERE WAS NO MENTION OF JOHN KERRY, OR ANY OTHER POLITICAL CANDIDATE AT
THE
LINKS YOU FURNISHED."

Unless you can furnish some actual evidence to back up your claim, the
only
possible conclusion could be that you are a lying sack of ****.

I wonder who lying sacks of **** prefer for POTUS? Based solely on your
post,
it must be someone other than John Kerry.

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:06:39 -0400, A boater wrote:


Personally, I am going to vote for Kerry before I vote against him.

Great. So you're voting for Kerry in 2004, Hillary in 2008?

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:45:02 -0400, thunder wrote:

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:06:39 -0400, A boater wrote:


Personally, I am going to vote for Kerry before I vote against him.

Great. So you're voting for Kerry in 2004, Hillary in 2008?

Interesting, it sounds as though you don't expect Kerry to win in 04 else
you wouldn't be suggesting Hillary would be running in 08. I would have
expected Kerry as the encumbent not to be challenged.

Throwing in the towel?

Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to

soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan. j-garofalo,west-virginia
..general,rec.boats

is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.

My response was a public service. Too many of your highly educated compatriots
instantly believe that any negative thing they hear about a political opponent
is the gospel truth.

I guess I see your perspective. Since the post was a lie intended to make Kerry
look
bad, it should have been allowed to stand unchallenged.

I'm sure that will be your own course of action, as Harry Krause posts
anti-Bush statements for the next few weeks.

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:34:08 -0400, A boater wrote:


Throwing in the towel?

You have got to be kidding. This is far from over. Anybody thinking
landslide, by either side, is just plain nuts. This is a tighter race
than 2000. In Sept.00, Gore had a bigger lead than Bush does now, and we
all now who is President.

http://www.zogby.com/features/featuredtables.dbm?ID=8

Kerry was leading just a few short days ago:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/sep/sep22.html

Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans" is
grasping at straws.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to

soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan .j-garofalo,west-virginia
.general,rec.boats

is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.

My response was a public service. Too many of your highly educated
compatriots
instantly believe that any negative thing they hear about a political
opponent
is the gospel truth.

I guess I see your perspective. Since the post was a lie intended to make
Kerry
look
bad, it should have been allowed to stand unchallenged.

I'm sure that will be your own course of action, as Harry Krause posts
anti-Bush statements for the next few weeks.