((((((((((( NAMBLA supports John Kerry!!!!!! (NAMBLA ==> North American Man Boy Love Association) ))))))
 

Check it out, it is on their website,

http://216.220.97.17/

http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!

And you, sir, appear to be a lying sack of ****.

I find the organization and its principles extremely distasteful, so I didn't
spend a lot of time going from page to page to page through their web
site...but....

*THERE WAS NO MENTION OF JOHN KERRY, OR ANY OTHER POLITICAL CANDIDATE AT THE
LINKS YOU FURNISHED."

Unless you can furnish some actual evidence to back up your claim, the only
possible conclusion could be that you are a lying sack of ****.

I wonder who lying sacks of **** prefer for POTUS? Based solely on your post,
it must be someone other than John Kerry.

Another one of the better-educated Bush supporters. :-)

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Check it out, it is on their website,

http://216.220.97.17/

http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!

And you, sir, appear to be a lying sack of ****.

I find the organization and its principles extremely distasteful, so I
didn't
spend a lot of time going from page to page to page through their web
site...but....

*THERE WAS NO MENTION OF JOHN KERRY, OR ANY OTHER POLITICAL CANDIDATE AT
THE
LINKS YOU FURNISHED."

Unless you can furnish some actual evidence to back up your claim, the
only
possible conclusion could be that you are a lying sack of ****.

I wonder who lying sacks of **** prefer for POTUS? Based solely on your
post,
it must be someone other than John Kerry.

Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to
soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan.j-garofalo,west-virginia.general,rec.boats
is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals Hate America!

I'm a liberal, and I hate your *plan* for America.

People who post crap like "NAMBLA supports John Kerry on its web page"
rather
obviously hate the truth.

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:11:05 -0400, " jim--" wrote:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.



Personally, I am going to vote for Kerry before I vote against him.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Check it out, it is on their website,

http://216.220.97.17/

http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!

And you, sir, appear to be a lying sack of ****.

I find the organization and its principles extremely distasteful, so I
didn't
spend a lot of time going from page to page to page through their web
site...but....

*THERE WAS NO MENTION OF JOHN KERRY, OR ANY OTHER POLITICAL CANDIDATE AT
THE
LINKS YOU FURNISHED."

Unless you can furnish some actual evidence to back up your claim, the
only
possible conclusion could be that you are a lying sack of ****.

I wonder who lying sacks of **** prefer for POTUS? Based solely on your
post,
it must be someone other than John Kerry.

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:06:39 -0400, A boater wrote:


Personally, I am going to vote for Kerry before I vote against him.

Great. So you're voting for Kerry in 2004, Hillary in 2008?

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:45:02 -0400, thunder wrote:

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:06:39 -0400, A boater wrote:


Personally, I am going to vote for Kerry before I vote against him.

Great. So you're voting for Kerry in 2004, Hillary in 2008?

Interesting, it sounds as though you don't expect Kerry to win in 04 else
you wouldn't be suggesting Hillary would be running in 08. I would have
expected Kerry as the encumbent not to be challenged.

Throwing in the towel?

Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to

soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan. j-garofalo,west-virginia
..general,rec.boats

is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.

My response was a public service. Too many of your highly educated compatriots
instantly believe that any negative thing they hear about a political opponent
is the gospel truth.

I guess I see your perspective. Since the post was a lie intended to make Kerry
look
bad, it should have been allowed to stand unchallenged.

I'm sure that will be your own course of action, as Harry Krause posts
anti-Bush statements for the next few weeks.

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:34:08 -0400, A boater wrote:


Throwing in the towel?

You have got to be kidding. This is far from over. Anybody thinking
landslide, by either side, is just plain nuts. This is a tighter race
than 2000. In Sept.00, Gore had a bigger lead than Bush does now, and we
all now who is President.

http://www.zogby.com/features/featuredtables.dbm?ID=8

Kerry was leading just a few short days ago:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/sep/sep22.html

Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans" is
grasping at straws.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,

Anyone who cross posts to

soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan .j-garofalo,west-virginia
.general,rec.boats

is trolling and you took the bait hook, line and sinker.

My response was a public service. Too many of your highly educated
compatriots
instantly believe that any negative thing they hear about a political
opponent
is the gospel truth.

I guess I see your perspective. Since the post was a lie intended to make
Kerry
look
bad, it should have been allowed to stand unchallenged.

I'm sure that will be your own course of action, as Harry Krause posts
anti-Bush statements for the next few weeks.

Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans" is
grasping at straws.


Not so fast, Taco Flipper. *You* were the one making the case that Republicans
didn't pander to the very people who would respond to something like this. I
believe *you* said it was because the Republicans are better educated.

I did say Republicans were better educated, and I said better educated
people are more informed than non educated people. The only person who
responded to his ridiculous post was you.

I would never say ALL Republicans in reference to any subject, just as I
would never say anything about ALL liberals. Possibly if you were better
educated you would understand sets and subsets and would not have
misunderstood such an easy concept.

By the way, who started this crazy letter, and what party were they likely
to vote for?




"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans"
is
grasping at straws.


Not so fast, Taco Flipper. *You* were the one making the case that
Republicans
didn't pander to the very people who would respond to something like this.
I
believe *you* said it was because the Republicans are better educated.

" jim--" wrote in message ...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports Kerry?

There is no evidence that NAMBLA supports anyone. The post was a troll
nothing more, nothing less.

There also is no evidence that the letter written concerning NAMBLA and
Kerry was written by someone who supports either party, he could have been
completely apolitical. It is possible that he supported Kerry and wanted to
make a post showing how terrible the Republicans are. It is possible that
NAMBLA did support Kerry. Who knows, and it does not matter. Kerry would
never endorse any of NAMBLA principles. It also has not been shown that the
person who made the post supported either party. When a post is crossposted
to so many unrelated groups, it is a troll. He succeeded it having Chuck
bite it hook, line and sinker.

And you seem to be fighting Gould for the bait.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

" jim--" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

" JimH" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

" JimH" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

My, my you ARE the stupid one, eh?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before
he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because
he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

My, my you ARE the stupid one, eh?

No, that would be you. You prove it every day. LOL!!!!!!

Hey Basskisser are you going to prove I cut and pasted my post? I want my
$1,000,000 paid in $100 bills. To make it easier for you to pay, I will
accept. $9500 a week for the next 105 weeks.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before
he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because
he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

My, my you ARE the stupid one, eh?

Cripes, that boy is dumber than a tree stump

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:M2_6d.149251$D%.126694@attbi_s51...
Hey Basskisser are you going to prove I cut and pasted my post? I want
my
$1,000,000 paid in $100 bills. To make it easier for you to pay, I will
accept. $9500 a week for the next 105 weeks.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before
he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In
fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea
what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because
he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure
liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

My, my you ARE the stupid one, eh?

Why does anyone have concern with whom the North American Marlon Brando Look
Alikes support???

-j



"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
Cripes, that boy is dumber than a tree stump

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:M2_6d.149251$D%.126694@attbi_s51...
Hey Basskisser are you going to prove I cut and pasted my post? I want
my
$1,000,000 paid in $100 bills. To make it easier for you to pay, I will
accept. $9500 a week for the next 105 weeks.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election
before
he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In
fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea
what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it",
because
he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure
liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

My, my you ARE the stupid one, eh?