BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Anchors are SUPPOSED to drag? (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/23139-anchors-supposed-drag.html)

JAXAshby September 24th 04 12:36 PM

Anchors are SUPPOSED to drag?
 
yup, according to a couple of real yo-yos on ths ng. if the anchor doesn't
move you haven't set it properly. anchors are *required* to move.

my goodness! are those clowns on two-tone green pills or something????

or maybe they have been sniffing too much of that gasoline that has no oxygen
atoms?

yuk.

Shen44 September 24th 04 05:43 PM

bject: Anchors are SUPPOSED to drag?
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 09/24/2004 04:36 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

yup, according to a couple of real yo-yos on ths ng. if the anchor doesn't
move you haven't set it properly. anchors are *required* to move.

my goodness! are those clowns on two-tone green pills or something????



Doodles, reading your "cut and dried" mathematical, from the book, approach to
anchoring, makes it real obvious, really quickly that most of your knowledge on
the subject comes from books or magazines.

Shen

Steven Shelikoff September 26th 04 04:28 AM

On 24 Sep 2004 11:36:30 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

yup, according to a couple of real yo-yos on ths ng. if the anchor doesn't
move you haven't set it properly. anchors are *required* to move.

my goodness! are those clowns on two-tone green pills or something????

or maybe they have been sniffing too much of that gasoline that has no oxygen
atoms?

yuk.


Apparently Jox has never used an anchor. Either that or lack of oxygen
to his brain is having an effect.

Steve

JAXAshby September 26th 04 01:07 PM

schlackoff, one of the yo-yo's who insists an anchor is supposed to drag, steps
right up for all to see.

(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 9/25/2004 11:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 24 Sep 2004 11:36:30 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

yup, according to a couple of real yo-yos on ths ng. if the anchor doesn't
move you haven't set it properly. anchors are *required* to move.

my goodness! are those clowns on two-tone green pills or something????

or maybe they have been sniffing too much of that gasoline that has no

oxygen
atoms?

yuk.


Apparently Jox has never used an anchor. Either that or lack of oxygen
to his brain is having an effect.

Steve









Steven Shelikoff September 26th 04 02:25 PM

On 26 Sep 2004 12:07:53 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff, one of the yo-yo's who insists an anchor is supposed to drag, steps
right up for all to see.


Jox's oxygen deprivation has removed his ability to understand the
difference between something that ideally would not move, but does move
in the real world. Apparently he's never anchored anywhere with a tidal
current or where the wind changes direction.

Steve

JAXAshby September 26th 04 10:03 PM

schlackoff, once again caught being stew ped, flip-flops thusly below.

so, schlack which is it? an anchor is SUPPOSED to move (so it doesn't break
the chain and/or deck chocks), or it is not supposed to move (and so does break
the chain and/or decks chocks under certain storm conditions)?

(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 9/26/2004 9:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 26 Sep 2004 12:07:53 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff, one of the yo-yo's who insists an anchor is supposed to drag,

steps
right up for all to see.


Jox's oxygen deprivation has removed his ability to understand the
difference between something that ideally would not move, but does move
in the real world. Apparently he's never anchored anywhere with a tidal
current or where the wind changes direction.

Steve









Steven Shelikoff September 26th 04 11:48 PM

On 26 Sep 2004 21:03:58 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff, once again caught being stew ped, flip-flops thusly below.

so, schlack which is it? an anchor is SUPPOSED to move (so it doesn't break
the chain and/or deck chocks), or it is not supposed to move (and so does break
the chain and/or decks chocks under certain storm conditions)?


See if your CO soaked pea brain can understand this: an anchor is not
supposed to move but under certain conditions, it does. If you're
anchoring in a bad storm and only have one anchor out, you're asking for
trouble no matter what kind of rode you use. If you're anchoring in a
bad storm and don't have enough scope, your anchor will break out no
matter what you use for rode. If you know what you're doing (and
obviously you don't) you can anchor safely with all chain rode or mixed
rode.


(Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 9/26/2004 9:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 26 Sep 2004 12:07:53 GMT,
(JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff, one of the yo-yo's who insists an anchor is supposed to drag,

steps
right up for all to see.


Jox's oxygen deprivation has removed his ability to understand the
difference between something that ideally would not move, but does move
in the real world. Apparently he's never anchored anywhere with a tidal
current or where the wind changes direction.

Steve










JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:53 AM

Does an anchor move or not?



only if it is set by a criminally negligent dumb **** trying to get his faggot
ass sent jail for several years.

JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:57 AM

If you're anchoring in a
bad storm and don't have enough scope, your anchor will break out no
matter what you use for rode.


nope. 10 to 1 on chain breaks the anchor loose, while 6 to 1 on nylon doesn't.

sorry, dood, dem's da physics. which, of course, you don't understand anything
except you wanna kill and/or injure someone. you wanna go to jail, dood.
have fun with the 300# drug dealer, dood. you are going to be there a couple
years.

Harry Krause September 27th 04 02:13 AM

JAXAshby wrote:
Does an anchor move or not?



only if it is set by a criminally negligent dumb **** trying to get his faggot
ass sent jail for several years.



The only thing you know about drag, JaxAss, is selection of "outfits" in
your closet.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Steven Shelikoff September 27th 04 02:34 AM

On 27 Sep 2004 00:57:49 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

If you're anchoring in a
bad storm and don't have enough scope, your anchor will break out no
matter what you use for rode.


nope. 10 to 1 on chain breaks the anchor loose, while 6 to 1 on nylon doesn't.


Yup, you just don't know how to anchor with chain, that's all. That's
ok, it's just one more thing you don't know about.

Steve

JAXAshby September 27th 04 03:09 AM

schackloof, you belong in jail. with all of your kind.

Anchors are SUPPOSED to drag?
From: (Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 9/26/2004 9:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 27 Sep 2004 00:57:49 GMT,
(JAXAshby) wrote:

If you're anchoring in a
bad storm and don't have enough scope, your anchor will break out no
matter what you use for rode.


nope. 10 to 1 on chain breaks the anchor loose, while 6 to 1 on nylon

doesn't.

Yup, you just don't know how to anchor with chain, that's all. That's
ok, it's just one more thing you don't know about.

Steve









Harry Krause September 27th 04 03:09 AM

JAXAshby wrote:
schackloof, you belong in jail. with all of your kind.


His "kind"? What, pray tell, do you mean by that?

Steve's a bright guy. You aren't.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

otnmbrd September 27th 04 03:32 AM



JAXAshby wrote:
If you're anchoring in a
bad storm and don't have enough scope, your anchor will break out no
matter what you use for rode.



nope. 10 to 1 on chain breaks the anchor loose, while 6 to 1 on nylon doesn't.

sorry, dood, dem's da physics. which, of course, you don't understand anything
except you wanna kill and/or injure someone. you wanna go to jail, dood.
have fun with the 300# drug dealer, dood. you are going to be there a couple
years.



"dem's da physics" ROFLMAO Doodles, IF you had any experience at
anchoring, you'd know how stupid this response is ...... since you
don't.......

otn

JAXAshby September 27th 04 12:19 PM

Steve's a bright guy. You aren't.

hoary, steve barely got out of high school, and his 575 combined SAT score
wouldn't get him into an open enrollment community college.

JAXAshby September 27th 04 12:21 PM

over the knee, if you should ever try to anchor and should a storm come up, do
hope and pray you don't injure someone with your lazyness. for if you do, you
will get up close and personal with a 300# drug dealer for a couple years.

otnmbrd
Date: 9/26/2004 10:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: et



JAXAshby wrote:
If you're anchoring in a
bad storm and don't have enough scope, your anchor will break out no
matter what you use for rode.



nope. 10 to 1 on chain breaks the anchor loose, while 6 to 1 on nylon

doesn't.

sorry, dood, dem's da physics. which, of course, you don't understand

anything
except you wanna kill and/or injure someone. you wanna go to jail, dood.
have fun with the 300# drug dealer, dood. you are going to be there a

couple
years.



"dem's da physics" ROFLMAO Doodles, IF you had any experience at
anchoring, you'd know how stupid this response is ...... since you
don't.......

otn









Harry Krause September 27th 04 12:21 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
Steve's a bright guy. You aren't.


hoary, steve barely got out of high school, and his 575 combined SAT score
wouldn't get him into an open enrollment community college.


I suspect Steve's SAT scores are higher than yours. I know mine are, and
I didn't do badly, and I expect Steve beat me on the math SAT. I only
got a 625 on that one.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Harry Krause September 27th 04 12:23 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
schackloof, you belong in jail. with all of your kind.


His "kind"? What, pray tell, do you mean by that?


his kind are the kind who purposely endanger the lives of others because they
are too frickin lazy to anchor properly. you know, hoary, the clowns who "drag
anchor" when in fact they purposely didn't set it correctly.



Why are you so concerned about anchoring? You've got yourself a little
puddle jumper sailboat, and I suspect you rarely leave the dock. I
sailed in Long Island Sound, too, and, other than on really stormy days,
it wasn't particularly challenging. It's not the ocean.


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Harry Krause September 27th 04 12:24 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
over the knee, if you should ever try to anchor and should a storm come up, do
hope and pray you don't injure someone with your lazyness. for if you do, you
will get up close and personal with a 300# drug dealer for a couple years.


Your roommate?

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

JAXAshby September 27th 04 12:50 PM

hoary, most people on LIS anchor properly, for the anchoring conditions on LIS.
namely, a largesh Danforth on a few feet of chain and a lot of nylon. people
who anchor on LIS seldom "drag anchor".

the people I have had a problem with are those frickin lazy *******s who use
all chain (because it runs through an electric windlass easier) and often on
too short of scope and then "drag anchor" across the anchorage hitting boats
all while claiming it is "an act of god" and not their fault at all. I was
nearly hit by two such lazy *******s in twenty minutes, one of which went on to
take out a 52 foot boat behind me.

hoary, I have sailed a number of places not on LIS. In fact, my own boat is at
this moment several hundred miles away from LIS.

Harry Krause
Date: 9/27/2004 7:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:
schackloof, you belong in jail. with all of your kind.


His "kind"? What, pray tell, do you mean by that?


his kind are the kind who purposely endanger the lives of others because

they
are too frickin lazy to anchor properly. you know, hoary, the clowns who

"drag
anchor" when in fact they purposely didn't set it correctly.



Why are you so concerned about anchoring? You've got yourself a little
puddle jumper sailboat, and I suspect you rarely leave the dock. I
sailed in Long Island Sound, too, and, other than on really stormy days,
it wasn't particularly challenging. It's not the ocean.


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?









Harry Krause September 27th 04 12:58 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
hoary, most people on LIS anchor properly, for the anchoring conditions on LIS.
namely, a largesh Danforth on a few feet of chain and a lot of nylon. people
who anchor on LIS seldom "drag anchor".

the people I have had a problem with are those frickin lazy *******s who use
all chain (because it runs through an electric windlass easier) and often on
too short of scope and then "drag anchor" across the anchorage hitting boats
all while claiming it is "an act of god" and not their fault at all. I was
nearly hit by two such lazy *******s in twenty minutes, one of which went on to
take out a 52 foot boat behind me.



There are lots of people with rope-chain combos who do not know how to
anchor, and whose anchors drag. There are plenty of situations where
you'll drag with almost any single anchor combo or technique. There are
inlets with significant winds and currents and tidal forces where it
doesn't matter what you are using, chair-rope, all chain, or a skyhook:
you're lucky if anything works in a reasonable amount of time. I'm sure
I have successfully anchored in places where you wouldn't dare.

Stop trying so hard to be the agent provocateur of boating knowledge. It
makes you look more foolish than your famous Speedo swimsuit photo.


hoary, I have sailed a number of places not on LIS. In fact, my own boat is at
this moment several hundred miles away from LIS.


Yeah...where...in Columbus, Ohio?


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Harry Krause September 27th 04 01:03 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
I suspect Steve's SAT scores are higher than yours. I know mine are, and
I didn't do badly, and I expect Steve beat me on the math SAT. I only
got a 625 on that one.


hoary, neither you nor schlackoff has shown any aptitude whatsoever to indicate
a capability of getting even a 625 on math. if I had received such a low score
on my math I certainly would not have studied what I did. I would -- like you
-- have chosen something like PolySci or Art History.



Yeah, well, I felt lucky to get a 625 in math. I've never made any
claims to being a math whiz. I did get an 800 on my verbal SAT and a
perfect score of 152 on the National Merits. But in my era and at my
high school, those kinds of scores were not unusual. We have more than a
dozen kids in my junior class who got perfect scores on the Merits.

I ended up with a liberal arts degree. I had no interest in a
trade-school college education.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:10 PM

I did get an 800 on my verbal SAT

yeah, sure, hoary. that is why you write so well.

at my
high school, those kinds of scores were not unusual.


hoary, I don't think you know what a score of 800 is. they are indeed unusual,
to say the least.

JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:14 PM

I ended up with a liberal arts degree. I had no interest in a
trade-school college education.


spoken just like the little kid who when he realizes he will never be able to
reach the cookie jar claims he doesn't like cookies.

so, hoary, just what did you do with the liberal arts degree you "ended up
with" (your exact words) when you found out you couldn't be educated in
anything useful?

Harry Krause September 27th 04 01:15 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
I did get an 800 on my verbal SAT


yeah, sure, hoary. that is why you write so well.

at my
high school, those kinds of scores were not unusual.


hoary, I don't think you know what a score of 800 is. they are indeed unusual,
to say the least.



Idiot. There were kids in my junior class who racked up scores
approaching 1600 for the pair, including a perfect 800 in either verbal
or math. I ended up with 1425, thanks to my verbal. I was pleased with
my math SAT. It was 50 points higher than my math PSAT the year earlier.

What was your verbal? 435?


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Harry Krause September 27th 04 01:19 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
I ended up with a liberal arts degree. I had no interest in a
trade-school college education.


spoken just like the little kid who when he realizes he will never be able to
reach the cookie jar claims he doesn't like cookies.

so, hoary, just what did you do with the liberal arts degree you "ended up
with" (your exact words) when you found out you couldn't be educated in
anything useful?


I got into an Ivy grad school on a fellowship that paid for tuition. I
still had to work to cover the other necessities.

My degrees were useful enough to teach me to never pose in a Speedo
bathing suit and allow the resulting photos to be published on the internet.

What are your degrees in, JaxAss? And are you still working as a towel
boy at the gay bathhouse?




--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:28 PM

hoary, once again you show you don't have a clew about the real world. why do
you do you do that?



Idiot. There were kids in my junior class who racked up scores
approaching 1600 for the pair, including a perfect 800 in either verbal
or math. I ended up with 1425, thanks to my verbal. I was pleased with
my math SAT. It was 50 points higher than my math PSAT the year earlier.

What was your verbal? 435?


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?









Harry Krause September 27th 04 01:30 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
hoary, once again you show you don't have a clew about the real world. why do
you do you do that?


Sorry, Jax-Ass, but this is another of those "conversations" your idiocy
has ended. Now, go slip on your Speedo and hustle on down to the
bathhouse where your buddies await you.

Ta-ta



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:33 PM

I got into an Ivy grad school on a fellowship that paid for tuition

hoary, you do NOT get into --- grad --- school, Ivy League or not, based on
your SAT's. SAT's are used to determine undergrad admissions.

someone with an 800 in verbals would know that, hoary.

Harry Krause September 27th 04 01:37 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
I got into an Ivy grad school on a fellowship that paid for tuition


hoary, you do NOT get into --- grad --- school, Ivy League or not, based on
your SAT's. SAT's are used to determine undergrad admissions.

someone with an 800 in verbals would know that, hoary.



Refer back to your question, dickhead.
You asked:

"so, hoary, just what did you do with the liberal arts degree you "ended
up with" (your exact words) when you found out you couldn't be educated
in anything useful?"

My answer:

I got into an Ivy grad school.


Now, on your way...I'm sure your buddies at the bath house are wondering
where you are.


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:37 PM

genie, you are -- as usual -- confused. I have never stated that anchors are
supposed to drag. a dragging anchor means the sailor has made an error. all
chain sailors make this error on purpose because they are too lazy to anchor
properly and wish to use an electric windlass (which is easier to use with all
chain).

"Gene Kearns"
Date: 9/27/2004 8:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 27 Sep 2004 11:17:19 GMT,
(JAXAshby) wrote:

schackloof, you belong in jail. with all of your kind.


His "kind"? What, pray tell, do you mean by that?


his kind are the kind who purposely endanger the lives of others because

they
are too frickin lazy to anchor properly. you know, hoary, the clowns who

"drag
anchor" when in fact they purposely didn't set it correctly.


Geesh.... will you finally strike a pose and decide whether the
anchor should drag on not.

One post says it must drag, the next post says it mustn't drag... your
argument has been clearly fallacious from the beginning, however,now,
after posting a zillion times you have figured out that you were
wrong..... no matter which one you pick... go ahead, get it over with
and just decide *how* you are wrong.

Now, "Speak!"
--



Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC
is located.
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.linksysnet.com Real Time
Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats
at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide










JAXAshby September 27th 04 01:42 PM

hoary, you do NOT get into any grad school based on a liberal arts degree you
"ended up with".

someone with an 800 in verbals would know that, hoary.

I got into an Ivy grad school on a fellowship that paid for tuition


hoary, you do NOT get into --- grad --- school, Ivy League or not, based

on
your SAT's. SAT's are used to determine undergrad admissions.

someone with an 800 in verbals would know that, hoary.



Refer back to your question, dickhead.
You asked:

"so, hoary, just what did you do with the liberal arts degree you "ended
up with" (your exact words) when you found out you couldn't be educated
in anything useful?"

My answer:

I got into an Ivy grad school.


Now, on your way...I'm sure your buddies at the bath house are wondering
where you are.


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?









Harry Krause September 27th 04 01:44 PM

JAXAshby wrote:
genie, you are -- as usual -- confused. I have never stated that anchors are
supposed to drag. a dragging anchor means the sailor has made an error. all
chain sailors make this error on purpose because they are too lazy to anchor
properly and wish to use an electric windlass (which is easier to use with all
chain).


Really? I have an "electric" windlass, and a mostly rope, partially
chain rode...and you know what? It is perfectly easy to use. When I want
to raise the anchor, I simply engage the engine, move towards the rode,
and the windlass winds it up as we go. Usually the anchor comes up
easily. If it is hard stuck, I reverse, let out line, attach an anchor
ball, and use it to raise the anchor.

This would be easier with chain? If I were using all chain, I'd need an
anchor ball big as the pustule on your shoulders...

You're full of ****, JaxAss. There are so many variables in anchoring
that for you to claim that those who use all chain are lazy just shows
what a dumb**** you really are.






We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Karl Denninger September 27th 04 02:23 PM


In article ,
JAXAshby wrote:


schackloof, you belong in jail. with all of your kind.


His "kind"? What, pray tell, do you mean by that?


his kind are the kind who purposely endanger the lives of others because they
are too frickin lazy to anchor properly. you know, hoary, the clowns who "drag
anchor" when in fact they purposely didn't set it correctly.


Oh give me a break.

If you have enough scope (like 10:1) anchors don't drag below their holding
capability. ABOVE it, they drag, of course.

Storm loads are extreme. There is also no guarantee that something won't
foul your rode (like, for example, another boat) and cause you to get loose
- often without any obvious reason AFTER the fact.

There were a LOT of boats that got loose in Ivan around here. I'll bet that
most of them got loose not because of their own mis-anchoring, but because
someone else dragged into them - it only takes one pinball in the machine to
screw dozens of people.

That's why I do EVERYTHING in my power to avoid anchoring out for such an
event, because while I have a shizload of brand new 3/4" rode to use for my
anchors, I cannot control the other guy who gets loose, and it takes very
little to screw you severely in a storm like this.

One little pontoon boat that comes from shore and blows into your rode will
hose you for sure.

--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind

Karl Denninger September 27th 04 02:28 PM


In article ,
JAXAshby wrote:


Yeah, well, I felt lucky to get a 625 in math


getting a 625 is lucky?

geesh, haory.

I've never made any
claims to being a math whiz.


obviously.


625 WHEN?

Prior to 1985 or so, a 625 was pretty goddamn good.

Nowdays its not all that good, because they "re-normed" the test, all to
make the lieberals look good.

--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind

Harry Krause September 27th 04 02:33 PM

Karl Denninger wrote:
In article ,
JAXAshby wrote:


Yeah, well, I felt lucky to get a 625 in math


getting a 625 is lucky?

geesh, haory.

I've never made any
claims to being a math whiz.


obviously.


625 WHEN?

Prior to 1985 or so, a 625 was pretty goddamn good.

Nowdays its not all that good, because they "re-normed" the test, all to
make the lieberals look good.

--


I'm on the cusp of being an old fart, Karl. I took the SATs in, oh,
1961, I'd say. It was a pretty good score in math, but my high school
graduating class was full of math geniuses, including a handful who got
perfect 800s. One, my best friend, later won a big-time national math
prize that presented him with a full scholarship to CalTech. He got a
b.s. in physics, then got a master's in physics, then a doctorate in
biology, and then, of all things, a law degree. We thought he'd never
leave school. At last contact, his practice involved genetics and
intellectual property law.

He's still a very regular guy.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

basskisser September 27th 04 03:10 PM

(JAXAshby) wrote in message ...
If you're anchoring in a
bad storm and don't have enough scope, your anchor will break out no
matter what you use for rode.


nope. 10 to 1 on chain breaks the anchor loose, while 6 to 1 on nylon doesn't.

sorry, dood, dem's da physics. which, of course, you don't understand anything
except you wanna kill and/or injure someone. you wanna go to jail, dood.
have fun with the 300# drug dealer, dood. you are going to be there a couple
years.


Well, "dood", why don't you explain "da physics" to us? Let's just see
what you know about vector mechanics, "dood".

Hepsabar Schlarbek September 27th 04 07:09 PM

Jesus! Reading some of JAX's posts are disturbing. Anybody know him
personally? Please say "NO"....

Harry Krause September 27th 04 07:40 PM

Hepsabar Schlarbek wrote:
Jesus! Reading some of JAX's posts are disturbing. Anybody know him
personally? Please say "NO"....



There was a book and then a movie about him...

"Looking for Mr. Goodbar."


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

LaBomba182 September 27th 04 07:51 PM

Subject: Anchors are SUPPOSED to drag?
From: (Hepsabar Schlarbek)


Jesus! Reading some of JAX's posts are disturbing. Anybody know him
personally? Please say "NO"....


I know someone (in fact it's someone who we see in this group from time to
time) who has met him, twice as I recall.
From what I was told, after he introduced himself the first time they met he
said, "I bet you think I'm an asshole."

As I recall my friends response was a diplomatic one. :-)

Capt. Bill


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com