Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch,
If you notice on johnkerry.com they list generalities with very little specific accomplishments. That's because any Senator has very little he or she can take personal, and exclusive credit for. It's a committee environment. That's why "served on this committee", "co-sponsored X bill". etc, is about as good as it gets. Good campaign smear though. Measure a legislator by the same yardstick you would use to evaluate an executive. It would be like asking Geoprge Bush to list all of his Senate votes during the last four years in the WH. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Eisboch, If you notice on johnkerry.com they list generalities with very little specific accomplishments. That's because any Senator has very little he or she can take personal, and exclusive credit for. It's a committee environment. That's why "served on this committee", "co-sponsored X bill". etc, is about as good as it gets. Actually "introduced or sponsored" important bills is about as good as it gets. So what *important* bills did Kerry introduce or sponsor? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gould,
It is not a campaign smear. A senator can list those bills that he sponsored of cosponsored that passed and became law. It would show the candidates ability to lead and initiate bills, and not just one who is voting on the party line. As I pointed out earlier, I could not find any bill of significance that Kerry sponsored or cosponsored. When I asked you to find one bill that you thought was significant, you could not find any either. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Eisboch, If you notice on johnkerry.com they list generalities with very little specific accomplishments. That's because any Senator has very little he or she can take personal, and exclusive credit for. It's a committee environment. That's why "served on this committee", "co-sponsored X bill". etc, is about as good as it gets. Good campaign smear though. Measure a legislator by the same yardstick you would use to evaluate an executive. It would be like asking Geoprge Bush to list all of his Senate votes during the last four years in the WH. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More bad news for Bush, good news for Americans | General |