Gould,

In disputing your position that the Bush Campaign is based upon lies, mud
and slander I can either say, "NO YOU ARE WRONG, it is Kerry's whose
campaign is based upon lies, mud and slander". Or I can show an independent
survey, that showed both parties are using negative campaigning as a way to
sway the middle 20%.

The survey that was done, did not a support either party, it was a very
legitimate attempt done by a college professor ( I think he was from
Stanford) to determine how much of the message by either candidates was
negative. It showed Kerry ahead by a slim margin.

You are guilty of using the same tactics that Rush and company are guilty
of. Repeat your message over and over again, hoping some of it will stick.
You say the majority of Republicans listen to Rush and Co.

How many registered Republicans are their in the US. How many of those
registered voters listen to Rush? How many of those who consider themselves
independents listen to the talk show? How many of those who consider
themselves liberal listen to the shows so they can say "... damn those dudes
are dumb". How large is the audience for right wing radio and TV shows?

Without any of this information to support your premise, you are guilty of
the exact same thing you accuse right wing talk shows of doing.

As far as your comment concerning more intelligent, it is consistently shown
that Republicans are better educated than the democrats, and that those with
more education read more and keep up with issues
My comment about dancing was a feeble attempt at humor.

You like to make statements and then think since you said it, it must be
true. In trying to prove you incorrect it is not fair to use information
provided by college professors to support my theory.

OK. I AM RIGHT AND YOUR ARE WRONG. The Kerry campaign is based upon lies,
mud and slander. The hate shown in the majority of Krause's posts (i.e. I
hope they bomb Crawford TX) is typical of those who vote for Kerry.

Is this better?





"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Ok, since the survey didn't agree with your theory, it must be wrong.
Since
I don't agree with you, I must be blind.

There is not much I can say.

Sure there is. Say you don't agree with me, and explain why.

Don't rely on a survey to do your thinking for you. If I wanted to debate
the
survey, I'd find out who put it together and communicate with them. Do you
speak for the survey group? If not, why would I bother to discuss it with
you?

For every survey "proving" one side of a political issue, there is an
equally
biased survey proving the other side. Surely this isn't news to a member
of the
"more intelligent, but can't dance, GOP."?