My guess is the only reason anyone would vote for Bush or Kerry is because
they support the principals of their respective parties.

You mean the Republicans all like Bush's small government and fiscal
accountability?

Gould 0738 wrote:
My guess is the only reason anyone would vote for Bush or Kerry is because
they support the principals of their respective parties.



You mean the Republicans all like Bush's small government and fiscal
accountability?



Perhaps the poster whose name got lost in your repost thinks that
Republican principals have nicer teats.

Vote for Bush? Sure...if you're into reality denial, as he is.






--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Gould, you said Kerry would never be your choice for president, but
considering the alternative it is the best option for you. Is it just
possible ...............


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
My guess is the only reason anyone would vote for Bush or Kerry is
because
they support the principals of their respective parties.

You mean the Republicans all like Bush's small government and fiscal
accountability?

Gould, you said Kerry would never be your choice for president, but
considering the alternative it is the best option for you. Is it just
possible ...............

I'm voting for change.
The most realistic chance to get the New American Century crew out of the WH is
to elect John Kerry.
Even if Kerry proved to be a *miserable* president for four years, (as I
believe he well might), it will put a stop to the malicious damage wrought so
far by the current brigands and the additional malicious damage planned for
their next term.

I could never support an administration that
ponders which freedoms and principles can or should be compromised next to
create an illusion of security in the country.

Is it just possible that those voting for Bush believe that Kerry is a worse
alternative to Bush?


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould, you said Kerry would never be your choice for president, but
considering the alternative it is the best option for you. Is it just
possible ...............

I'm voting for change.
The most realistic chance to get the New American Century crew out of the
WH is
to elect John Kerry.
Even if Kerry proved to be a *miserable* president for four years, (as I
believe he well might), it will put a stop to the malicious damage wrought
so
far by the current brigands and the additional malicious damage planned
for
their next term.

I could never support an administration that
ponders which freedoms and principles can or should be compromised next to
create an illusion of security in the country.

Is it just possible that those voting for Bush believe that Kerry is a worse
alternative to Bush?

It would be impossible to ascribe a single motivation to the entire group of
people voting for Bush.

Some may feel that he would be better than Kerry.

Others have expressed specific opinions that he is an outstanding, heroic,
blah, blah, blah, father figure of his country, leader.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
It would be impossible to ascribe a single motivation to the entire group
of
people voting for Bush.

Ahhhhhh, I see we are in agreement. So it is very possible that the
opinions expressed on right wing radio are not representative of the the
majority of people who vote for a Republican candidate.

Thank you very much.