Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what. Every country in the World is dependent upon a strong
America...both economically and militarily. They're own self-preservation instincts will bring 'em around sooner or later. When you find yourself at increased risk as the result of support for somebody who is treating you like manure, the common solution is unlikely to be *increasing* support. The US has some major fence mending to do with the rest of the world, regardless of the outcome in November. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But you claim that Bush is treating America like manure. So why are his
poll numbers sky-rocketing? Because the Bush campaign spent more money "defining" Kerry than Kerry could spend getting his message out so far. An incumbent doesn't have to utterly destroy the competition, merely create enough fear and doubt that the people will stick with the devil they know over the devil they don't. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure Hitler's poll numbers were pretty high at this point in his
administration, too. Just because his electorate was stupid enough to swallow the rhetoric didn't necessarily make his view of the world the right, one did it? Or did it..... Capt. Jeff |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... So what. Every country in the World is dependent upon a strong America...both economically and militarily. They're own self-preservation instincts will bring 'em around sooner or later. When you find yourself at increased risk as the result of support for somebody who is treating you like manure, the common solution is unlikely to be *increasing* support. But you claim that Bush is treating America like manure. So why are his poll numbers sky-rocketing? Because Americans like simple answers to complicated problems, even if the answers are wrong. For them to be otherwise would mean they'd have to face the horrible reality, and that is this: our military might ain't gonna resolve Islamist terrorism for us. -- We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah. What, me worry? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tamaroak wrote:
I'm sure Hitler's poll numbers were pretty high at this point in his administration, too. Just because his electorate was stupid enough to swallow the rhetoric didn't necessarily make his view of the world the right, one did it? Or did it..... Capt. Jeff Hitler was smarter than Bush, and a better speaker, too. While Bush isn't the monster Hitler was...he's working on it. -- We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah. What, me worry? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tamaroak" wrote in message ... I'm sure Hitler's poll numbers were pretty high at this point in his administration, too. Just because his electorate was stupid enough to swallow the rhetoric didn't necessarily make his view of the world the right, one did it? Or did it..... I've never seen an historical account where it was claimed that Germany was attacked by the Jews...or the French...or the Poles. Were they? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tamaroak wrote: I'm sure Hitler's poll numbers were pretty high at this point in his administration, too. Just because his electorate was stupid enough to swallow the rhetoric didn't necessarily make his view of the world the right, one did it? Or did it..... Capt. Jeff Hitler was smarter than Bush, and a better speaker, too. More proof that where Hitler wowed 'em with style, Bush prefers to wow 'em with substance. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... So what. Every country in the World is dependent upon a strong America...both economically and militarily. They're own self-preservation instincts will bring 'em around sooner or later. When you find yourself at increased risk as the result of support for somebody who is treating you like manure, the common solution is unlikely to be *increasing* support. But you claim that Bush is treating America like manure. So why are his poll numbers sky-rocketing? Because Americans like simple answers to complicated problems, even if the answers are wrong. For them to be otherwise would mean they'd have to face the horrible reality, and that is this: our military might ain't gonna resolve Islamist terrorism for us. I figured that the horrible reality was that we would have to become what we despise: cold-blooded, calculated killers willing to use any *AND ALL* weapons at our disposal...just like the terrorists. I don't favor the use of nukes...but the message needs to be sent that they will remain an option if the killing of our troops continues to escalate. A war against the US cannot be won. Is it more humane to kill 100's per day times thousands of days...or doom the same number of people in a matter of seconds? And which one has more shock appeal to subdue the enemy by exhausting his will to fight? I know how FDR chose to answer those questions. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Curtis CCR wrote:
You think the author of this bill really wants a draft? Charlie Rangel??? How about the co-sponsors? Sheila Jackson-Lee and Pete Stark want a draft? I think a draft that does not exclude rich, white kids would be delightful. It certainly would bring an end to unjustified militarism on our part. -- We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah. What, me worry? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tamaroak wrote: I'm sure Hitler's poll numbers were pretty high at this point in his administration, too. Just because his electorate was stupid enough to swallow the rhetoric didn't necessarily make his view of the world the right, one did it? Or did it..... Capt. Jeff Hitler was smarter than Bush, and a better speaker, too. More proof that where Hitler wowed 'em with style, Bush prefers to wow 'em with substance. Oh? Did Bush buy some substance somewhere? -- We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah. What, me worry? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Republican myths | General | |||
Selective Service, The Draft in the US | ASA | |||
DRAFT: June-Dec 2003 Whitewater Accident Summary | General | |||
Draft Calculations | Boat Building | |||
FS: 1979 Hunter 27' Shoal Draft Sloop in N. Florida | Marketplace |