Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:14:29 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote: On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 20:25:32 -0800, "Chuck Tribolet" wrote: Mozilla is user-trainable, so the moving target isn't a problem. When it misses one, you just mark it as spam, Mozilla gets retrained a little, and it gets dropped in the Junk folder. Sure--but if you have to be continually retraining your mail client, it kind of defeats the purpose, doesn't it? My situation may be a tad different, because of the sheer volume of spam I receive (close to 1,000 a day). Filters alone won't work for me simply because so many of the spammers are developing countermesures to evade them. Ultimately, the only solution to spam is for it to be no longer profitable for the spammers--that people stop responding ot it. Joe Parsons The problem is bigger than that, Joe. Much of the Spam that any address receives is generated by random address engines. They sit and spin 24 hours a day, sending spam-mail to every conceivable address. Additionally, if you make one mistake, email one harvestable database, you are forever "locked". The only out is to munge headers, or change your address. It sucks, but that's life. The change-able: Regards, noah To email me, remove the "OT-" from OT-wrecked.boats.noah. ....as you were. ![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Biggest Usenet SPAMMER Finally Identified!!! ----- IOlRvcv4Jk | General |