"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I wonder why BushCo is so afraid to debate Kerry?
Also:

Bad strategic move.

The Repubs have spent most of their campaign money and energy smearing
Kerry,
and with no small amount of success. Most of the people in the country
have a badly distorted image of Bush's opponent.

A debate would undo a lot of what the right wing has "accomplished" so
far. If
Kerry loses this deal, it will be because the right wing spent more money
and
energy telling the American public who John Satan Kerry is than Kerry was
able
to. Kerry has been defined by the opposition- often a losing position in
any
game.

Bush is not a good speaker, (to put it kindly). He would look like the
daily
dufous
trying to find and correctly pronounce the words he would need to answer
questions from a panel.

Contrary to low expectations going in, Bush out-debated Ann Richards, and he
out-debated Al Gore. He'll beat Kerry because Kerry will come across as a
high-brow elitest and alienate the common man swing voter. In today's day
and age, you try to appeal to the middle 20%...and that's the group that
votes by the seat of their pants...many times voting simply for the
candidate that is "more likeable". More people like Bush. Kerry has
virtually no appeal to people who don't identify themselves as staunch
Democrats.

The irony is that the subject matter and each candidates answers probably
won't matter. Kerry's better grasp of the English language may actually
work against him by alienating the average joe that makes up the middle 20%.

NOYB wrote:
In today's day
and age, you try to appeal to the middle 20%...and that's the group that
votes by the seat of their pants...many times voting simply for the
candidate that is "more likeable".

Republicans appeal to the lowest common denominator. Bush is about as
low as you can go, in terms of ability, intellect, and getting along
with others.

He's a scumball. But America seems to be heading towards the gutter, so
perhaps it is fitting, eh?

A hundred years from now, or even 50, Arabic will be the native language
here, and its rise will be traced to the failures of George W. Bush.


--
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
And don't forget to pay your taxes so the rich don't have to!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
In today's day
and age, you try to appeal to the middle 20%...and that's the group that
votes by the seat of their pants...many times voting simply for the
candidate that is "more likeable".

Republicans appeal to the lowest common denominator.

Both sides appeal to the lowest common denominator. We target the religious
zealots and bigots...and you guys target the social deviants and immoral
hedonists.

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:32:11 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Both sides appeal to the lowest common denominator. We target the
religious zealots and bigots...and you guys target the social deviants and
immoral hedonists.

Begs the question. which are you? A religious zealot, or a bigot? ;-)

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A hundred years from now, or even 50, Arabic will be the native language
here, and its rise will be traced to the failures of George W. Bush.


What in the world are you talking about? Are you suggesting that the Muslim
world will overthrow our government? Are you suggesting that so many Arabs
speaking individuals will move to the US that they will be able to vote for
a new official language?

Or are you just making a joke?

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:kf02d.196792$mD.57069@attbi_s02...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A hundred years from now, or even 50, Arabic will be the native language
here, and its rise will be traced to the failures of George W. Bush.


What in the world are you talking about? Are you suggesting that the
Muslim
world will overthrow our government? Are you suggesting that so many
Arabs
speaking individuals will move to the US that they will be able to vote
for
a new official language?

Or are you just making a joke?

harry is just a simple union hack, with little understanding of the real
world. He lives in a fantasy world where he owns a 36 ft lobsta boat and his
social worker wife is a doctor doctor.

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:13:55 +0000, NOYB wrote:


The irony is that the subject matter and each candidates answers probably
won't matter. Kerry's better grasp of the English language may actually
work against him by alienating the average joe that makes up the middle
20%.

Sad, isn't it? If being a likable lug is all it takes to be POTUS, this
democracy isn't working. Hell, if this Presidential race has turned into
a popularity contest, I'm going to vote for Michelle Pfeiffer. At least
I'll pay attention during any news conferences.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:13:55 +0000, NOYB wrote:


The irony is that the subject matter and each candidates answers
probably
won't matter. Kerry's better grasp of the English language may actually
work against him by alienating the average joe that makes up the middle
20%.

Sad, isn't it? If being a likable lug is all it takes to be POTUS, this
democracy isn't working. Hell, if this Presidential race has turned into
a popularity contest, I'm going to vote for Michelle Pfeiffer. At least
I'll pay attention during any news conferences.

Is Pfeiffer a Republican or a Democrat?

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:07:00 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:13:55 +0000, NOYB wrote:


The irony is that the subject matter and each candidates answers
probably
won't matter. Kerry's better grasp of the English language may actually
work against him by alienating the average joe that makes up the middle
20%.

Sad, isn't it? If being a likable lug is all it takes to be POTUS, this
democracy isn't working. Hell, if this Presidential race has turned into
a popularity contest, I'm going to vote for Michelle Pfeiffer. At least
I'll pay attention during any news conferences.

Is Pfeiffer a Republican or a Democrat?

She is the Walrus.

Koo Koo Ka Choo...

Later,

Tom