Sigh. Why the novel Chuck? Can't you state an opinion in a couple of
sentences? You obviously have a lot of idle time on your hands.



Sorry if your attention span doesn't allow you to digest four or five
paragraphs.

Sorry to **** you off by busting your binary model of the world and suggesting
that there are more than two alternatives (unbridled aggression and
capitulation) to solving the problem.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Sigh. Why the novel Chuck? Can't you state an opinion in a couple of
sentences? You obviously have a lot of idle time on your hands.

So how do we do all that without the military being used in reserve as a
tool? Is your world always so perfect?

Sorry but *I* don't have the perfect answer and won't write a novel in a
remote NG claiming so. Perhaps you should give the President a jingle
with
yours as you obviously found the answer to the worlds problems.

Sorry if your attention span doesn't allow you to digest four or five
paragraphs.

You could have made your point with the first sentence in each paragraph. I
think you love to read what you wrote.



Sorry to **** you off by busting your binary model of the world and
suggesting
that there are more than two alternatives (unbridled aggression and
capitulation) to solving the problem.

Actually you offered one solution (as a whole) yourself so I guess your
model is just a binary.

And you never answered my question.

So how do we do all that without the military being used in reserve as a
tool?

And you never answered my question.

So how do we do all that without the military being used in reserve as a
tool?



The original statement, the one you found too exhausting to finish, recommends
exactly that. See the point about using the military to insure cooperation for
our agents.