Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

jps wrote:


In article . net,
says...



Most people with a ****ing brain would consider this an acceptable trade
off. That means that 97.8% of the employed people are being paid a
living wage instead of an unacceptable percentage living in poverty.

No, it doesn't. A lot of them are laid off and find
work in other jobs right away, at no better wage than
they had.


Then we're not doing a very good job at training them for making a wage
that'd keep them out of jobs that cannot provide a living wage.

I'd rather have the training problem than the poverty issue any day. It
doesn't surprise me you don't understand since your team's only real
concern is making certain corporate profits are maximized.

Hey poopsy! Corporate America would like nothing better than to have a
large pool of trained workers to draw from. Whose fault is it that such
a pool doesn't exist? Our public schools? Delinquent parents? Lack of
ambition? Or is this Corporate America's fault?

If anyone needs a kick in the shorts it's parents and the NEA.
LZ


The NEA isn't to blame.

The NEA most certainly *is* to blame. They are the
worst, most immoral special interest group in the country.

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

jps wrote:

In article . net,
says...


'jps' and Harry Dumbo Krause just don't like Microsoft
because they're big business, and as
accomplishment-free whiners, they feel they have no
choice but to hate the accomplished.


Your assumptions are, as usual, hate-filled and without basis.

My observations are, as usual, emotion free and
absolutely correct.


I make my business based on the research and development Microsoft has
funded and brought to market.

While I disagree with some of Bill's tactics and believe he should be
held accountable, without his aggressive pursuit of Microsoft goals the
PC industry would be far behind where it is today.

I think competition is healthy AND he didn't make his fortune by holding
his employees heads under water, like Walmart.

Wal-Mart does not hold anyone's head under water.
Wal-Mart's manpower needs are very different from
Microsoft's. Each pays the appropriate wage to attract
the talent they need. Neither is unionized.

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

Harry Dumbo Krause wrote:

We are our brothers' keepers.

We are not. You go ahead, if you wish, but leave me
out of it. I'll resist, with force.

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

Jonathan Ball wrote:

Harry Dumbo Krause wrote:

We are our brothers' keepers.

We are not. You go ahead, if you wish, but leave me
out of it. I'll resist, with force.


Piddler.
--
Email sent to is never read.

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Jonathan Ball wrote:


Harry Dumbo Krause wrote:


We are our brothers' keepers.

We are not. You go ahead, if you wish, but leave me
out of it. I'll resist, with force.



Piddler.

Zero. Whiner. Self-marginalized ****worm.

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

jps wrote:

Certainly, the states bear some responsibility but I don't think our
national mental health policy should be administered at the state level.

Why bother having states at all? Just have a national government, eh?

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

Harry Krause wrote:

We are our brothers' keepers.

....he says standing by and watching the konservatrash die after the bus
ran over him.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

In article . net,
says...
jps wrote:

The Reagan and the present Bush Administration know the easiest way to
eviscerate a program is to hand the money to the states. They're all in
terrible shape and would divert the money in a moment's notice to those
with a louder voice.

That's why I blame the Reagan Admin.

No, that's not why, lying cocksucker. You blame him
because it's an irrational, knee-jerk, hate-based
reaction you can't control.

Boy, there's a well-reasoned response. Pure flatulence -- your
specialty.

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

In article t,
says...
jps wrote:

Here, find it for yourself. I don't need to spoon feed you.

http://www.cursor.org/about/themoney.php

Leftist bull****. Anything that has a quote from Eric
Alterman at the top is not to be trusted even to tell
you the correct time of day.

Read the first paragraph and dismissed it? It's not Eric Alterman's
cite you stupid fool.

It's Media Transparency you should be looking at. No bull****, just the
background of every contributor to your right-wing think tanks.

The cite wasn't for you anyway Ballless, it was for LZ who seems to have
a far greater ability to think for himself. He's the one who cited the
info on the Swiss settlements that you DARED me to post. ****in' freak.

Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
 

In article . net,
says...
jps wrote:

In article ,
says...


Don't use logic on JPS. It just confuses him.
LZ


Giggle all you want LZ, I think we need a national health policy that
looks after people in states that would be as backwards as possible
given the chance.

Oh, just another garden-variety communist.

Another elitist pig who thinks health should be the exclusive domain of
those who can afford it.