|
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
jps wrote:
In article , says... Jonathan Ball wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Jonathan Ball wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Jonathan Ball wrote: jps wrote: In article . net, says... jps wrote: In article et, says... Wal-Mart does not hold anyone's head under water. Wal-Mart's manpower needs are very different from Microsoft's. Each pays the appropriate wage to attract the talent they need. Neither is unionized. Walmart screws people in order to gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Wal-Mart doesn't screw anyone. They offer employment, and people voluntarily take it. Because, unless they want to live on welfare and food stamps, there are few other choices. Read this and learn something... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Dec13.html You'll see a quote from your hallowed Employment Policy Institute about the fact that jobs being created are "low quality." Is it better to have a low quality job, or no job at all, asswipe? Surely you'll find out I have always known. I'm sure you know a lot about low-quality jobs. No, I know about $100,000+ jobs. I hold one. So, you work 10 shifts at 7-11. BFD. He says he's got a $100k+ "job" while he asserts being the Chief Executive of a California corporation. It's not a "job" if you're the founder and a corporate executive. Your thin veil is thinner than I thought. His semantics, not mine. He's a snot-nosed college kid, living off of daddy's monthly checks. -- Email sent to is never read. |
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
jps wrote:
In article , says... jps wrote: In article , says... Sounds to me like you are taking power from the people and shipping it to Washington. Jerk, Individual states would be welcome to exceed Federal standards if their elected officials saw fit to pass legislation supporting such policies. A Federal standard would ensure that, under no circumstances would people be treated at less than a minimum standard. So perhaps you can explain how that's not giving people power? It's not giving the "people" power. It's giving government's power. Dave By setting a minimum standard of regard for human beings? I can't imagine any reasoning that'd convince me that the power we give the government to make this mandate wouldn't be worth it. It's not taking power away from people, it's ensuring their well-being. But the "power" is not theirs. Their "well-being" is at the whim of the government. Give it a shot if you must Dave but I think you'd be better off moving onto an argument that's defensible. You made the claim "power to the people", which is incorrect anytime you have to depend on government to provide for you. True "power to the people" would be the individual's power to determine their own destiny independant of any governmental entity. Dave jps |
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
jps wrote:
In article , says... jps wrote in message . .. In article . net, says... jps wrote: In article , says... Don't use logic on JPS. It just confuses him. LZ Giggle all you want LZ, I think we need a national health policy that looks after people in states that would be as backwards as possible given the chance. Oh, just another garden-variety communist. Another elitist pig who thinks health should be the exclusive domain of those who can afford it. Another logically challeneged person who equates not giving a freebie to someone with denying it to him. Logic? A minimum standard for health in our country is illogical? No, your fatuous belief that not giving something to someone who hasn't paid for it is the same as "denying" it to him. It isn't. You are wrong. |
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
jps wrote in message . ..
In article , says... jps wrote in message . .. In article . net, says... jps wrote: In article , says... Don't use logic on JPS. It just confuses him. LZ Giggle all you want LZ, I think we need a national health policy that looks after people in states that would be as backwards as possible given the chance. Oh, just another garden-variety communist. Another elitist pig who thinks health should be the exclusive domain of those who can afford it. Another logically challeneged person who equates not giving a freebie to someone with denying it to him. Logic? A minimum standard for health in our country is illogical? Caring for the infirmed is "giving a freebie?" I suppose those who cannot care for themselves should just whither and die? Can we send them to your neighborhood? Where would you like them to go. Another pig who thinks health is the exclusive domain of those who can afford it. Come over to my house and clean out my septic tank. Why are you denying me a clear septic tank? What are you, some kind of cold hearted elitist pig? |
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
Mark Neglay wrote:
Why are you denying me a clear septic tank? Because a really clean septic tank won't work. Is that what you want? |
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
|
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
In article ,
says... jps wrote in message . .. In article , says... jps wrote in message . .. In article . net, says... jps wrote: In article , says... Don't use logic on JPS. It just confuses him. LZ Giggle all you want LZ, I think we need a national health policy that looks after people in states that would be as backwards as possible given the chance. Oh, just another garden-variety communist. Another elitist pig who thinks health should be the exclusive domain of those who can afford it. Another logically challeneged person who equates not giving a freebie to someone with denying it to him. Logic? A minimum standard for health in our country is illogical? Caring for the infirmed is "giving a freebie?" I suppose those who cannot care for themselves should just whither and die? Can we send them to your neighborhood? Where would you like them to go. Another pig who thinks health is the exclusive domain of those who can afford it. Come over to my house and clean out my septic tank. Why are you denying me a clear septic tank? What are you, some kind of cold hearted elitist pig? Well, fine bit of logic applied to the problem of health care for poor Americans. Foolish of me to expect a cold hearted idiot who equates a clean septic tank to health care for our society's citizenry to understand. You a bean counter too? How many turds you figure that septic tank can hold, not counting yourself? |
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
jps wrote in message .. .
In article , says... jps wrote in message . .. In article , says... jps wrote in message . .. In article . net, says... jps wrote: In article , says... Don't use logic on JPS. It just confuses him. LZ Giggle all you want LZ, I think we need a national health policy that looks after people in states that would be as backwards as possible given the chance. Oh, just another garden-variety communist. Another elitist pig who thinks health should be the exclusive domain of those who can afford it. Another logically challeneged person who equates not giving a freebie to someone with denying it to him. Logic? A minimum standard for health in our country is illogical? Caring for the infirmed is "giving a freebie?" I suppose those who cannot care for themselves should just whither and die? Can we send them to your neighborhood? Where would you like them to go. Another pig who thinks health is the exclusive domain of those who can afford it. Come over to my house and clean out my septic tank. Why are you denying me a clear septic tank? What are you, some kind of cold hearted elitist pig? Well, fine bit of logic applied to the problem of health care for poor Americans. Foolish of me to expect a cold hearted idiot who equates a clean septic tank to health care for our society's citizenry to understand. You a bean counter too? How many turds you figure that septic tank can hold, not counting yourself? Do I or do I not have a right to have a functioning septic tank? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com