![]() |
Five footers...on the Bay?
The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay:
Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay: Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the Bay has some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty although the winds forecasted certainly are. Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry? |
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay: Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the Bay has some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty although the winds forecasted certainly are. Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry? The Bay is relatively shallow, Dennis, and where we are, not very wide. There are significant portions of the shoreline barely above sea level. With any kind of wind, five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on top of water that may only be three to four feet deep out a half mile to nearly a mile in some places leads to an interesting visual. Dennis, at best, and I mean at best, you may have been the owner of a boat that rarely left the dock, according to your own posts. I suspect if you were out in the ocean or even this Bay on a rough day, you'd brownstain your shorts. Pethaps the next time you have a really nasty storm on Lake Erie, you and your wife should go out in it for some fun. Be sure to let the rest of us know how the two of you do. Got a real name, Dennis? Got an occupation, Dennis? Got a college degree, Dennis? Got a working brain, Dennis? Didn't think so. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are
you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? the Chesa is shallow, so five footers -- if they might develop, and the weather reporters have not been exagerating a mite -- would be short, steep and breaking. could be a handful for most boats. |
Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry?
hoary has not even *seen* 1-2 footers. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay: Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the Bay has some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty although the winds forecasted certainly are. Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry? The Bay is relatively shallow, Dennis, and where we are, not very wide. As is Lake Erie and Sandusky Bay. 5 footers on either of them are not uncommon. There are significant portions of the shoreline barely above sea level. With any kind of wind, five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on top of water that may only be three to four feet deep out a half mile to nearly a mile in some places leads to an interesting visual. What sort of storm surge is expected on the Bay? I do not recall any talk about storm surges on the Chesapeake Bay resulting from Charley. Got a link? |
five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on
top of water that may only be three to four feet deep hoary, five foot waves can NOT exist in three to four foot deep water without breaking, therefore out a half mile to nearly a mile can not happen. nice try, hoary. |
Harry,
I know you don't know a lot about boating, but 2' ft waves, building to 5 ft. waves is in the main body, Only a fool would assume the narrow shallow creeks and inlets would experience the same waves that the main body of the wave. If you look at the forecast for the inlets, you would see they are expect 2' to 3' waves. The forecast for Baltimore is "NE WIND INCREASING TO 25 TO 30 KT WITH GUSTS UP TO 40 KT. WAVES 2 TO 3 FT. A CHANCE OF TSTMS THROUGH THE NIGHT. RAIN AND TSTMS TAPERING OFF LATE. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay: Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the Bay has some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty although the winds forecasted certainly are. Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry? The Bay is relatively shallow, Dennis, and where we are, not very wide. There are significant portions of the shoreline barely above sea level. With any kind of wind, five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on top of water that may only be three to four feet deep out a half mile to nearly a mile in some places leads to an interesting visual. Dennis, at best, and I mean at best, you may have been the owner of a boat that rarely left the dock, according to your own posts. I suspect if you were out in the ocean or even this Bay on a rough day, you'd brownstain your shorts. Pethaps the next time you have a really nasty storm on Lake Erie, you and your wife should go out in it for some fun. Be sure to let the rest of us know how the two of you do. Got a real name, Dennis? Got an occupation, Dennis? Got a college degree, Dennis? Got a working brain, Dennis? Didn't think so. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Comcast News" wrote in message news:t2uTc.8313$mD.1821@attbi_s02... Harry, I know you don't know a lot about boating, but 2' ft waves, building to 5 ft. waves is in the main body, Only a fool would assume the narrow shallow creeks and inlets would experience the same waves that the main body of the wave. If you look at the forecast for the inlets, you would see they are expect 2' to 3' waves. The forecast for Baltimore is "NE WIND INCREASING TO 25 TO 30 KT WITH GUSTS UP TO 40 KT. WAVES 2 TO 3 FT. A CHANCE OF TSTMS THROUGH THE NIGHT. RAIN AND TSTMS TAPERING OFF LATE. Too bad it will be dark when it happens. I bet Krause never saw such violent seas. He-he-he. |
jim--,
He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. "jim--" wrote in message ... "Comcast News" wrote in message news:t2uTc.8313$mD.1821@attbi_s02... Harry, I know you don't know a lot about boating, but 2' ft waves, building to 5 ft. waves is in the main body, Only a fool would assume the narrow shallow creeks and inlets would experience the same waves that the main body of the wave. If you look at the forecast for the inlets, you would see they are expect 2' to 3' waves. The forecast for Baltimore is "NE WIND INCREASING TO 25 TO 30 KT WITH GUSTS UP TO 40 KT. WAVES 2 TO 3 FT. A CHANCE OF TSTMS THROUGH THE NIGHT. RAIN AND TSTMS TAPERING OFF LATE. Too bad it will be dark when it happens. I bet Krause never saw such violent seas. He-he-he. |
"Comcast News" wrote in message news:k9uTc.255379$%_6.15101@attbi_s01... jim--, He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. I bet he is sandbagging his house in anticipation of the tremendous storm surge he is expecting on the Bay from this tropical storm. As you know, much of the beach area is at sea level where he lives. LOL! |
jim-- wrote:
"Comcast News" wrote in message news:k9uTc.255379$%_6.15101@attbi_s01... jim--, He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. I bet he is sandbagging his house in anticipation of the tremendous storm surge he is expecting on the Bay from this tropical storm. As you know, much of the beach area is at sea level where he lives. LOL! You obviously never saw the photos of our yard that I posted about two years ago. While there are many areas along the Bay that are indeed only a couple of feet higher than the water reaches at high tide, we're on higher, safer ground, with no erosion problem. Never been to the Bay, eh, dumfoch? Even some of those on higher ground are nervous every time there is a significant storm. Their houses sit on cliffs that are subject to erosion and eventually will collapse into the Bay. They're not on land I'd ever buy, but it does provide a spectacular view while it lasts. Look up Calvert Cliffs. Wait..you're not that clever. He http://www.fossilguy.com/sites/calvert/ There are houses on cliffs adjacent to these where the geology is precisely the same. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Look at me, Look at me"...... grin
Harry was it the Doctor Doctor who took the pictures of your yard or was it the Yale Graduate? PS here is a picture of my yard. http://doors.stanford.edu/~sr/washin...hite-house.jpg See how easy it easy. Harry, you are such a putz. .. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Comcast News" wrote in message news:k9uTc.255379$%_6.15101@attbi_s01... jim--, He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. I bet he is sandbagging his house in anticipation of the tremendous storm surge he is expecting on the Bay from this tropical storm. As you know, much of the beach area is at sea level where he lives. LOL! You obviously never saw the photos of our yard that I posted about two years ago. While there are many areas along the Bay that are indeed only a couple of feet higher than the water reaches at high tide, we're on higher, safer ground, with no erosion problem. Never been to the Bay, eh, dumfoch? Even some of those on higher ground are nervous every time there is a significant storm. Their houses sit on cliffs that are subject to erosion and eventually will collapse into the Bay. They're not on land I'd ever buy, but it does provide a spectacular view while it lasts. Look up Calvert Cliffs. Wait..you're not that clever. He http://www.fossilguy.com/sites/calvert/ There are houses on cliffs adjacent to these where the geology is precisely the same. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Look at me, Look at me"...... grin Harry was it the Doctor Doctor who took the pictures of your yard or was it the Yale Graduate? PS here is a picture of my yard. http://doors.stanford.edu/~sr/washin...hite-house.jpg See how easy it easy. Harry, you are such a putz. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Comcast News" wrote in message news:k9uTc.255379$%_6.15101@attbi_s01... jim--, He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. I bet he is sandbagging his house in anticipation of the tremendous storm surge he is expecting on the Bay from this tropical storm. As you know, much of the beach area is at sea level where he lives. LOL! You obviously never saw the photos of our yard that I posted about two years ago. While there are many areas along the Bay that are indeed only a couple of feet higher than the water reaches at high tide, we're on higher, safer ground, with no erosion problem. Never been to the Bay, eh, dumfoch? Even some of those on higher ground are nervous every time there is a significant storm. Their houses sit on cliffs that are subject to erosion and eventually will collapse into the Bay. They're not on land I'd ever buy, but it does provide a spectacular view while it lasts. Look up Calvert Cliffs. Wait..you're not that clever. He http://www.fossilguy.com/sites/calvert/ There are houses on cliffs adjacent to these where the geology is precisely the same. So? We have plenty of similar cliffs along the perimeter of the Great Lakes and their islands. Unless their houses are now to/near the edges of those cliffs (because of erosion) then there is nothing to worry about. All bodies of water see storms. All land along those bodies of water erodes over the years. Been so since the beginning of time. So what is your point Krause? To deflect the fact that you are afraid of 5 foot waves and anticipate a tremendous storm surge from this tropical storm? He-he-he...me thinks so. Yawn |
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Comcast News" wrote in message news:k9uTc.255379$%_6.15101@attbi_s01... jim--, He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. I bet he is sandbagging his house in anticipation of the tremendous storm surge he is expecting on the Bay from this tropical storm. As you know, much of the beach area is at sea level where he lives. LOL! You obviously never saw the photos of our yard that I posted about two years ago. While there are many areas along the Bay that are indeed only a couple of feet higher than the water reaches at high tide, we're on higher, safer ground, with no erosion problem. Never been to the Bay, eh, dumfoch? Even some of those on higher ground are nervous every time there is a significant storm. Their houses sit on cliffs that are subject to erosion and eventually will collapse into the Bay. They're not on land I'd ever buy, but it does provide a spectacular view while it lasts. Look up Calvert Cliffs. Wait..you're not that clever. He http://www.fossilguy.com/sites/calvert/ There are houses on cliffs adjacent to these where the geology is precisely the same. So? We have plenty of similar cliffs along the perimeter of the Great Lakes and their islands. Unless their houses are now to/near the edges of those cliffs (because of erosion) then there is nothing to worry about. Some of them are a couple of feet away from where the edge is now...and over the years, some of them have fallen as the cliffs collapsed. So, there is plenty to worry about... All bodies of water see storms. All land along those bodies of water erodes over the years. Been so since the beginning of time. Not much of a geology student, eh? I suppose that's because you never took a geology course because you never attended college. You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
If someone's house is in danger of falling into the bay, it is time to move
the house. There are very few things I am sure of, but the bay will see 2 to 5 ft. waves many times in the near future. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Comcast News" wrote in message news:k9uTc.255379$%_6.15101@attbi_s01... jim--, He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. I bet he is sandbagging his house in anticipation of the tremendous storm surge he is expecting on the Bay from this tropical storm. As you know, much of the beach area is at sea level where he lives. LOL! You obviously never saw the photos of our yard that I posted about two years ago. While there are many areas along the Bay that are indeed only a couple of feet higher than the water reaches at high tide, we're on higher, safer ground, with no erosion problem. Never been to the Bay, eh, dumfoch? Even some of those on higher ground are nervous every time there is a significant storm. Their houses sit on cliffs that are subject to erosion and eventually will collapse into the Bay. They're not on land I'd ever buy, but it does provide a spectacular view while it lasts. Look up Calvert Cliffs. Wait..you're not that clever. He http://www.fossilguy.com/sites/calvert/ There are houses on cliffs adjacent to these where the geology is precisely the same. So? We have plenty of similar cliffs along the perimeter of the Great Lakes and their islands. Unless their houses are now to/near the edges of those cliffs (because of erosion) then there is nothing to worry about. Some of them are a couple of feet away from where the edge is now...and over the years, some of them have fallen as the cliffs collapsed. So, there is plenty to worry about... All bodies of water see storms. All land along those bodies of water erodes over the years. Been so since the beginning of time. Not much of a geology student, eh? I suppose that's because you never took a geology course because you never attended college. You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Comcast News" wrote in message news:k9uTc.255379$%_6.15101@attbi_s01... jim--, He reminds me of a little kid with ADD who is jumping up and down saying "look at me" "look at me", oh won't someone pay me some attention. I loved his attempt at showing concern about NYOB, when he said he would not push him out of the way if I bus was going to hit him. I bet he is sandbagging his house in anticipation of the tremendous storm surge he is expecting on the Bay from this tropical storm. As you know, much of the beach area is at sea level where he lives. LOL! You obviously never saw the photos of our yard that I posted about two years ago. While there are many areas along the Bay that are indeed only a couple of feet higher than the water reaches at high tide, we're on higher, safer ground, with no erosion problem. Never been to the Bay, eh, dumfoch? Even some of those on higher ground are nervous every time there is a significant storm. Their houses sit on cliffs that are subject to erosion and eventually will collapse into the Bay. They're not on land I'd ever buy, but it does provide a spectacular view while it lasts. Look up Calvert Cliffs. Wait..you're not that clever. He http://www.fossilguy.com/sites/calvert/ There are houses on cliffs adjacent to these where the geology is precisely the same. So? We have plenty of similar cliffs along the perimeter of the Great Lakes and their islands. Unless their houses are now to/near the edges of those cliffs (because of erosion) then there is nothing to worry about. Some of them are a couple of feet away from where the edge is now...and over the years, some of them have fallen as the cliffs collapsed. So, there is plenty to worry about... So what is so unusual about that? Are you saying that situation is unique to your cliffs? All bodies of water see storms. All land along those bodies of water erodes over the years. Been so since the beginning of time. Not much of a geology student, eh? I suppose that's because you never took a geology course because you never attended college. So you disagree with my statements? You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. |
From Oswego New York, 3 to 5 foot waves are common on lake Ontario, and you
don't need the a hurricane to make them. Yes, we have fished many times in 3 to 4 foot waves and we start to get off the lake when they hit 5 foot.... but that's us in a 23 foot boat. "Comcast News" wrote in message news:t2uTc.8313$mD.1821@attbi_s02... Harry, I know you don't know a lot about boating, but 2' ft waves, building to 5 ft. waves is in the main body, Only a fool would assume the narrow shallow creeks and inlets would experience the same waves that the main body of the wave. If you look at the forecast for the inlets, you would see they are expect 2' to 3' waves. The forecast for Baltimore is "NE WIND INCREASING TO 25 TO 30 KT WITH GUSTS UP TO 40 KT. WAVES 2 TO 3 FT. A CHANCE OF TSTMS THROUGH THE NIGHT. RAIN AND TSTMS TAPERING OFF LATE. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay: Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the Bay has some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty although the winds forecasted certainly are. Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry? The Bay is relatively shallow, Dennis, and where we are, not very wide. There are significant portions of the shoreline barely above sea level. With any kind of wind, five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on top of water that may only be three to four feet deep out a half mile to nearly a mile in some places leads to an interesting visual. Dennis, at best, and I mean at best, you may have been the owner of a boat that rarely left the dock, according to your own posts. I suspect if you were out in the ocean or even this Bay on a rough day, you'd brownstain your shorts. Pethaps the next time you have a really nasty storm on Lake Erie, you and your wife should go out in it for some fun. Be sure to let the rest of us know how the two of you do. Got a real name, Dennis? Got an occupation, Dennis? Got a college degree, Dennis? Got a working brain, Dennis? Didn't think so. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
jim-- wrote:
You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis, but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of social promotion? -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Joseph Stachyra" wrote in message ... From Oswego New York, 3 to 5 foot waves are common on lake Ontario, and you don't need the a hurricane to make them. Yes, we have fished many times in 3 to 4 foot waves and we start to get off the lake when they hit 5 foot.... but that's us in a 23 foot boat. I agree. In fact 5-7 footers on Lake Erie (a shallow lake) have been common this spring/summer. Most boat owners have been in 5-7 footers. I know I have. Hell, some storms result in 8-12 footers, sometimes much much higher. Poor Harry has never even seen 5 footers though as he claims it would be a sight to see for him. He-he-he. Maybe he needs to get out on the water for the first time. |
Joseph Stachyra wrote:
From Oswego New York, 3 to 5 foot waves are common on lake Ontario, and you don't need the a hurricane to make them. Yes, we have fished many times in 3 to 4 foot waves and we start to get off the lake when they hit 5 foot.... but that's us in a 23 foot boat. Let's try to put this in perspective. When we lived in Florida, five foot ocean waves were common. We live adjacent to Chesapeake Bay now, and five foot waves are not common. We normally see ones to twos in our area. It isn't the waves per se that trouble me today, because I am not out on the water and won't be until the weather calms. What concerns me is the storm surge. It could prove troublesome to those on the lower-lying areas of the Bay, some of which are near us. We have many property owners and towns and marinas barely above sea level, and a substantial surge will make a mess. We normally do NOT have much of a surge here, absent a major storm. I guess this no longer is a newsgroup where anything abstract can be discussed without the usual pack of assholes (I'm not putting you in this group, Joe) immediately jumping on and seeing if they can destroy the discussion. "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis, but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of social promotion? The childish insults have begun in earnest, signifying the point that Harry has lost this discussion...as usual. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis, but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of social promotion? BTW: How does it feel to know I am always in your mind and eating away at you? He-he-he. |
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis, but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of social promotion? The childish insults have begun in earnest, signifying the point that Harry has lost this discussion...as usual. Not at all. But you come across as an ignorant, uneducated dolt, incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning. And since you refuse to answer any questions about your life, your education, your work, one might safely conclude you are an uneducated asshole. Go ahead...post something that demonstates your thinking ability, Dennis. Something original. Anything. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis, but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of social promotion? BTW: How does it feel to know I am always in your mind and eating away at you? He-he-he. You're delusional. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
Joseph,
I have been on small lakes in a storm with 20 knot winds, that had 3 to 5 ft. waves, but they scare the dickens out of our boy Harry. On the other hand, I would love to see a body of water, 2 to 3 ft. deep making waves 3 to 5ft deep. I am not sure, but I don't think it is physically possible. "Joseph Stachyra" wrote in message ... From Oswego New York, 3 to 5 foot waves are common on lake Ontario, and you don't need the a hurricane to make them. Yes, we have fished many times in 3 to 4 foot waves and we start to get off the lake when they hit 5 foot.... but that's us in a 23 foot boat. "Comcast News" wrote in message news:t2uTc.8313$mD.1821@attbi_s02... Harry, I know you don't know a lot about boating, but 2' ft waves, building to 5 ft. waves is in the main body, Only a fool would assume the narrow shallow creeks and inlets would experience the same waves that the main body of the wave. If you look at the forecast for the inlets, you would see they are expect 2' to 3' waves. The forecast for Baltimore is "NE WIND INCREASING TO 25 TO 30 KT WITH GUSTS UP TO 40 KT. WAVES 2 TO 3 FT. A CHANCE OF TSTMS THROUGH THE NIGHT. RAIN AND TSTMS TAPERING OFF LATE. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay: Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the Bay has some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty although the winds forecasted certainly are. Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry? The Bay is relatively shallow, Dennis, and where we are, not very wide. There are significant portions of the shoreline barely above sea level. With any kind of wind, five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on top of water that may only be three to four feet deep out a half mile to nearly a mile in some places leads to an interesting visual. Dennis, at best, and I mean at best, you may have been the owner of a boat that rarely left the dock, according to your own posts. I suspect if you were out in the ocean or even this Bay on a rough day, you'd brownstain your shorts. Pethaps the next time you have a really nasty storm on Lake Erie, you and your wife should go out in it for some fun. Be sure to let the rest of us know how the two of you do. Got a real name, Dennis? Got an occupation, Dennis? Got a college degree, Dennis? Got a working brain, Dennis? Didn't think so. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
jim--,
Whenever Harry is wrong, his MO is to make insults like a kid on the playground. I hope you don't have any 2 - 5 ft. waves where you boat, gosh almighty, what would you do. ; ) "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis, but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of social promotion? The childish insults have begun in earnest, signifying the point that Harry has lost this discussion...as usual. |
Harry,
When you post anything about your life, it is always proven to be a figment of your imagination. Tell us again about your Lobster Boat, your doctor doctor wife (you know the social worker), and the 3 times you sailed around the horn. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today. Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your sock puppet names) or whatever your name is today. You are just too easy Krause. I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis, but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of social promotion? The childish insults have begun in earnest, signifying the point that Harry has lost this discussion...as usual. Not at all. But you come across as an ignorant, uneducated dolt, incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning. And since you refuse to answer any questions about your life, your education, your work, one might safely conclude you are an uneducated asshole. Go ahead...post something that demonstates your thinking ability, Dennis. Something original. Anything. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
Harry,
Read 99% of your posts, and you contribute nothing to the NG, except personal insults. Remember, you harvest what you sow, and when someone lives in a glass house, one should not throw stones. ; ) "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Joseph Stachyra wrote: From Oswego New York, 3 to 5 foot waves are common on lake Ontario, and you don't need the a hurricane to make them. Yes, we have fished many times in 3 to 4 foot waves and we start to get off the lake when they hit 5 foot.... but that's us in a 23 foot boat. Let's try to put this in perspective. When we lived in Florida, five foot ocean waves were common. We live adjacent to Chesapeake Bay now, and five foot waves are not common. We normally see ones to twos in our area. It isn't the waves per se that trouble me today, because I am not out on the water and won't be until the weather calms. What concerns me is the storm surge. It could prove troublesome to those on the lower-lying areas of the Bay, some of which are near us. We have many property owners and towns and marinas barely above sea level, and a substantial surge will make a mess. We normally do NOT have much of a surge here, absent a major storm. I guess this no longer is a newsgroup where anything abstract can be discussed without the usual pack of assholes (I'm not putting you in this group, Joe) immediately jumping on and seeing if they can destroy the discussion. "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... I guess this no longer is a newsgroup where anything abstract can be discussed without the usual pack of assholes (I'm not putting you in this group, Joe) immediately jumping on and seeing if they can destroy the discussion. Is it possible you telling someone you would like to see a bus hit them, or that you would shot someone with your gun to keep them away from you, could possible have any influence as to how you are treated in this NG? |
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:03:56 -0400 "jim--" wrote..
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay: Tonight NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35 to 40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to 5 ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the evening tapering to scattered showers overnight. Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay... Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would be a sight to see. Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why are you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the Bay has some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty although the winds forecasted certainly are. Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry? The Bay is relatively shallow, Dennis, and where we are, not very wide. As is Lake Erie and Sandusky Bay. 5 footers on either of them are not uncommon. There are significant portions of the shoreline barely above sea level. With any kind of wind, five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on top of water that may only be three to four feet deep out a half mile to nearly a mile in some places leads to an interesting visual. What sort of storm surge is expected on the Bay? I do not recall any talk about storm surges on the Chesapeake Bay resulting from Charley. Got a link? I finally figured you out Jim. Krause pays to to post. That way, his posts are discussed more widely than they might be. That's it isn't it? You and your sock puppets are foils for krause. How much are you paid? Is it enough to life off of? Enquiring minds want to know. -- Posted by usenet4all.com |
only hoary would differeniate between "thinking" and "reasoning".
... incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning. |
foot ocean waves were common. We live adjacent to Chesapeake Bay now,
and five foot waves are not common hoary, don't worry about it. the chesa is too shallow to support five foot waves that aren't breaking, and breaking waves don't make much distance. |
I have been on small lakes in a storm with 20 knot winds, that had 3 to 5
ft. waves, no you haven't. 20 knots winds take a long time and long fetch to get to be 3 to 5 foot waves, and even then you need water most usually deeper than is found in a "small lake". |
On the other
hand, I would love to see a body of water, 2 to 3 ft. deep making waves 3 to 5ft deep. I am not sure, but I don't think it is physically possible. it isn't possible. |
JAXAshby wrote:
only hoary would differeniate between "thinking" and "reasoning". ... incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning. Thinking is thought, cogitation, meditation, mental action or activity, while reasoning is the process by which one judgement is deduced from another or others which are given. One can think abstractly or reason abstractly, separately or simultaneously. One can also think or reason without involving the abstract, as it were. How's your narrative thinking? Better than your abstract thinking? -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
JAXAshby wrote:
foot ocean waves were common. We live adjacent to Chesapeake Bay now, and five foot waves are not common hoary, don't worry about it. the chesa is too shallow to support five foot waves that aren't breaking, and breaking waves don't make much distance. Last year during the hurricane, some Bay towns had four foot waves breaking on their streets. They moved enough to remove houses from their foundations. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
yuk
Thinking is thought, cogitation, meditation, mental action or activity, while reasoning is the process by which one judgement is deduced from another or others which are given. One can think abstractly or reason abstractly, separately or simultaneously. One can also think or reason without involving the abstract, as it were. How's your narrative thinking? Better than your abstract thinking? -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
Last year during the hurricane, some Bay towns had four foot waves
breaking on their streets. no they didn't. they four feet of water on their streets, but they most certainly did not have foot waves on their streets. To have four foot waves they would need water about 40 feet deep, give or take a bit depending on how steep the waves were. They moved enough to remove houses from their foundations. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com