A 5' wave will break in 6.5'

more like 30 feet

of water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it,

https://www.cnmoc.navy.mil/nmosw/tr8...text/sect4.htm

*if* you read that, dood -- and obviously you either did not or otherwise you
purposely misunderstood it -- you would have noticed that it is anecdotal data
not measured data that *projects* what might happen in a cat or cat 5 hurricane
that makes a direct hit.

geesh, dood. read for crying out loud.

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs, for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.



" Wave heights in the Harbor (Baltimore) are minimal. The maximum wave
height that can be expected is 5 ft."

"Dependent on the wind speed and duration, winds from the north or south
have the greatest fetch in Chesapeake Bay. Pilots indicate that wave
heights in the upper Bay do not normally exceed 6 ft during severe
weather. However, the width of the lower Bay provides considerable fetch
for strong westerly or easterly winds that could be associated with
tropical cyclones. Easterly winds can produce the highest waves at the Bay
mouth that can result in wave heights of 10 ft or more."

From:

https://www.cnmoc.navy.mil/nmosw/tr8...text/sect4.htm



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves.

damn those laws of physics!! who the hell were those corrupt politicians who
voted for them??

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs, for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

yeah, hoary, those damn laws of physics were voted in by corrupt politicians
and their ain't no way *you* will EVER get sucked by them.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how
fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs, for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

JAXAshby wrote:

yeah, hoary, those damn laws of physics were voted in by corrupt politicians
and their ain't no way *you* will EVER get sucked by them.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how
fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs, for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


As I stated, I offered observations on water depths. Feel free to
comment upon those observations at any time.
I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

yeah, hoary, those damn laws of physics were voted in by corrupt
politicians
and their ain't no way *you* will EVER get sucked by them.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how
fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of
water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course
this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's
plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs,
for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


As I stated, I offered observations on water depths. Feel free to
comment upon those observations at any time.
I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.

So how was that storm surge during the rain storm this weekend on the Bay?
Must have been frightful, especially since it was accompanied by 3-5
footers. Scary stuff....eh Krause?

hoary, you seem to have a major gap in your recall of what and how much you
said. And after only a few hours. geesh.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

yeah, hoary, those damn laws of physics were voted in by corrupt
politicians
and their ain't no way *you* will EVER get sucked by them.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how
fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of
water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course
this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs, for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


As I stated, I offered observations on water depths. Feel free to
comment upon those observations at any time.
I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, you seem to have a major gap in your recall of what and how much you
said. And after only a few hours. geesh.



I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.
How's that crappy little sailbote of yours? Ready to take on Long Island
Sound?


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:02:27 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Five footers on Chesapeake Bay ain't pretty. It's not like five footers
out on the ocean. On the Bay, waves that size are going to be breaking,
and with the shifty winds, coming at you from several directions, and
with the peaks fairly close together. Running five footers on the ocean
can be fun; on the Bay, it loosens your fillings.



No worse than 5 footers on shallow Lake Erie. Not fun but no big deal.


Harry gives a good description of what 5 footers are on Lake Erie.

Anyone that says 5 footers on Lake Erie are no big deal, watch them on
tv from their living room.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:02:27 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Five footers on Chesapeake Bay ain't pretty. It's not like five footers
out on the ocean. On the Bay, waves that size are going to be breaking,
and with the shifty winds, coming at you from several directions, and
with the peaks fairly close together. Running five footers on the ocean
can be fun; on the Bay, it loosens your fillings.



No worse than 5 footers on shallow Lake Erie. Not fun but no big deal.


Harry gives a good description of what 5 footers are on Lake Erie.

Anyone that says 5 footers on Lake Erie are no big deal, watch them on
tv from their living room.

Sorry Wally, been out in 3-5's many times. No big deal.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:44:31 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"WaIIy" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:02:27 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Five footers on Chesapeake Bay ain't pretty. It's not like five
footers
out on the ocean. On the Bay, waves that size are going to be
breaking,
and with the shifty winds, coming at you from several directions, and
with the peaks fairly close together. Running five footers on the
ocean
can be fun; on the Bay, it loosens your fillings.



No worse than 5 footers on shallow Lake Erie. Not fun but no big deal.


Harry gives a good description of what 5 footers are on Lake Erie.

Anyone that says 5 footers on Lake Erie are no big deal, watch them on
tv from their living room.

Sorry Wally, been out in 3-5's many times. No big deal.


Three footers and five footers on Lake Erie are two completely different
animals.

No kidding.....especially on the west end when the wind is coming from the
east.



What boat do you have?

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:44:31 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"WaIIy" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:02:27 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Five footers on Chesapeake Bay ain't pretty. It's not like five
footers
out on the ocean. On the Bay, waves that size are going to be
breaking,
and with the shifty winds, coming at you from several directions, and
with the peaks fairly close together. Running five footers on the
ocean
can be fun; on the Bay, it loosens your fillings.



No worse than 5 footers on shallow Lake Erie. Not fun but no big deal.


Harry gives a good description of what 5 footers are on Lake Erie.

Anyone that says 5 footers on Lake Erie are no big deal, watch them on
tv from their living room.

Sorry Wally, been out in 3-5's many times. No big deal.


Three footers and five footers on Lake Erie are two completely different
animals.

What boat do you have?

I just sold a 3200 Maxum SCR. Prior to that I had a Sundancer 270. Prior
to that I had a Chris Craft Scorpion 210. Any my very first boat was a 16
foot trihull for inland lakes. I have been on the water all my life.

We live less than a mile from the Lake. We boated for the past 25+ years
and have been in waves up to 6-8 footers with the Maxum...in fact from
Leamington, Canada to Kelley's Island. We went out regularly in 3-5 footers
to get to the islands. I picked up the Searay and delivered it to our dock
in at least 3-5 footers.

And if you don't know that waves are observed in a 3-5 foot category, as
well as others, then you obviously don't boat.

Yep 3-5 footers are not comfortable but they are not terrible.

So what boat do you have?

I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.
How's that crappy little sailbote of yours? Ready to take on Long Island
Sound?

see hoary? already you have forgotten that my Porta-Bote does not have the
optional sailing rig.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:56:46 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"WaIIy" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:44:31 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"WaIIy" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:02:27 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Five footers on Chesapeake Bay ain't pretty. It's not like five
footers
out on the ocean. On the Bay, waves that size are going to be
breaking,
and with the shifty winds, coming at you from several directions,
and
with the peaks fairly close together. Running five footers on the
ocean
can be fun; on the Bay, it loosens your fillings.



No worse than 5 footers on shallow Lake Erie. Not fun but no big
deal.


Harry gives a good description of what 5 footers are on Lake Erie.

Anyone that says 5 footers on Lake Erie are no big deal, watch them on
tv from their living room.

Sorry Wally, been out in 3-5's many times. No big deal.


Three footers and five footers on Lake Erie are two completely different
animals.

What boat do you have?

I just sold a 3200 Maxum SCR. Prior to that I had a Sundancer 270. Prior
to that I had a Chris Craft Scorpion 210. Any my very first boat was a 16
foot trihull for inland lakes. I have been on the water all my life.

We live less than a mile from the Lake.

Well, I live about a mile from the lake and lived on the lake for six
years.

Good for you.



We boated for the past 25+ years
and have been in waves up to 6-8 footers with the Maxum...in fact from
Leamington, Canada to Kelley's Island. We went out regularly in 3-5
footers
to get to the islands.

Then what? Rocked and rolled on a mooring ball or rafted off to other
boats bouncing like a yo-yo?

Have you ever been to Kelleys and docked at Seaway? Not much rocking and
rolling there. Even Unique Marker is pretty well protected. Did the
mooring buoys at Put in Bay once during the day and the Lake was pretty flat
though.


I picked up the Searay and delivered it to our dock
in at least 3-5 footers.

And if you don't know that waves are observed in a 3-5 foot category, as
well as others, then you obviously don't boat.

Obviously

Well, OK if you say so.


Yep 3-5 footers are not comfortable but they are not terrible.

All I can say is, I think you are not very good at judging wave height.

I rely on what is being reported and my experience. White caps form at
about 3. When it is 3-5 out there you will see 5 footers. Believe
otherwise if you want.

And you are an expert at wave heights? Ever been out in 3-5's? BTW...I
would not go out in them when we had the 21 footer.



So what boat do you have?

http://thebayguide.com/rec.boats/wallys.html

So you cannot handle 5 footers in the boat? Seems like it is not the boat
but the captain.

Looks like Huron Lagoons Marina. We were there for 7 years. You would not
happen to be that drunk across from us (when we were there on the D side)
who fell in the water every weekend would you?

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:56:46 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"WaIIy" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:44:31 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"WaIIy" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:02:27 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Five footers on Chesapeake Bay ain't pretty. It's not like five
footers
out on the ocean. On the Bay, waves that size are going to be
breaking,
and with the shifty winds, coming at you from several directions,
and
with the peaks fairly close together. Running five footers on the
ocean
can be fun; on the Bay, it loosens your fillings.



No worse than 5 footers on shallow Lake Erie. Not fun but no big
deal.


Harry gives a good description of what 5 footers are on Lake Erie.

Anyone that says 5 footers on Lake Erie are no big deal, watch them on
tv from their living room.

Sorry Wally, been out in 3-5's many times. No big deal.


Three footers and five footers on Lake Erie are two completely different
animals.

What boat do you have?

I just sold a 3200 Maxum SCR. Prior to that I had a Sundancer 270. Prior
to that I had a Chris Craft Scorpion 210. Any my very first boat was a 16
foot trihull for inland lakes. I have been on the water all my life.

We live less than a mile from the Lake.

Well, I live about a mile from the lake and lived on the lake for six
years.

We boated for the past 25+ years
and have been in waves up to 6-8 footers with the Maxum...in fact from
Leamington, Canada to Kelley's Island. We went out regularly in 3-5
footers
to get to the islands.

Then what? Rocked and rolled on a mooring ball or rafted off to other
boats bouncing like a yo-yo?

I picked up the Searay and delivered it to our dock
in at least 3-5 footers.

And if you don't know that waves are observed in a 3-5 foot category, as
well as others, then you obviously don't boat.

Obviously

Yep 3-5 footers are not comfortable but they are not terrible.

All I can say is, I think you are not very good at judging wave height.

So what boat do you have?

http://thebayguide.com/rec.boats/wallys.html

Forgot to say, nice boat.

BTW: Heading out for the Lake in 1/2 hour for a trip over the Kelleys on my
friends Lyman. Maybe see you there

I'm trying to figure out what purpose a Sunfish would have *without* a
sailing rig..... an anchor, perhaps?

good question, gene. so why are you and hoary debating if my sunfish (or
Sunfish) has a sailing rig or not?

no, gene, my inflatable kayak does not need a sail, and I store it on the
foredeck of my sunfish (or is that Sunfish?)

From: "Gene Kearns"
Date: 8/19/2004 8:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 19 Aug 2004 02:27:44 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

I'm trying to figure out what purpose a Sunfish would have *without* a
sailing rig..... an anchor, perhaps?

good question, gene. so why are you and hoary debating if my sunfish (or
Sunfish) has a sailing rig or not?

Gosh, I thought we were talking about your..... uh...... inflatable
kayak?

--



Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC
is located.
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.linksysnet.com Real Time
Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats
at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide

Gene Kearns wrote:

On 20 Aug 2004 01:33:32 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

no, gene, my inflatable kayak does not need a sail, and I store it on the
foredeck of my sunfish (or is that Sunfish?)


If your boat is made by Vanguard, it is a Sunfish.... if you have
some other euphemism you are trying to use by not capitalizing the
S.... I don't know what you are trying to say.

You, attired in the Speedos, piloting a Sunfish with an inflatable
kayak on the foredeck........ would, most assuredly, be quite a sight.



Mine was made by Alcort, in Waterbury, Connecticut...so there!


--
Save America - Defeat Bush!

gune, sunfish (even Sunfish) have been made for over a half century. that is,
in fact, well before the Vanguard Corp was ever thought of. way to go, yo-yo.



From: "Gene Kearns"
Date: 8/19/2004 10:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 20 Aug 2004 01:33:32 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

no, gene, my inflatable kayak does not need a sail, and I store it on the
foredeck of my sunfish (or is that Sunfish?)


If your boat is made by Vanguard, it is a Sunfish.... if you have
some other euphemism you are trying to use by not capitalizing the
S.... I don't know what you are trying to say.

You, attired in the Speedos, piloting a Sunfish with an inflatable
kayak on the foredeck........ would, most assuredly, be quite a sight.

--



Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC
is located.
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.linksysnet.com Real Time
Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats
at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide

I'm well aware of that, Jax

so, why did you say you weren't aware of that? a senior moment, gune?

gune, Sunfish (the brand name) have been in production over 50 years, not the
25 or 30 years you stated. I believe (meaning I could be wrong) that all
production Sunfish from sometime in the late '50's or early '60's were
fiberglass. I believe that Sunfish (the brand name) plans were available from
Sunfish (the brand name) to the public until sometime in the '60's, and these
homemade sunfish were made of plywood, as the original Sunfish were (though the
orginal Sunfish, I believe, had no footwell).

gune, my use of lower case and upper case was an effort at levity (which is
quite different from, trust me on this one gune, levitate), that seems utterly
beyond any rational world you inhabit on a day by day basis.

I'm well aware of that, Jax

so, why did you say you weren't aware of that? a senior moment, gune?

I didn't, Jax. In the late 60's they were still Sunfish.... all
wood, perhaps, but Sunfish, nevertheless.

What I said was that I didn't understand what sort of importance *you*
attached to your frequent mention of capitalization quirks a la
"sunfish (even Sunfish)."

You still haven't explained yourself. Again, what is it that you are
trying to say?

--



Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC
is located.
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats
at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide

gune, like all with low IQ's, is utterly lacking in the capability to
understand levity, or levitate.

gune, my use of lower case and upper case was an effort at levity (which is
quite different from, trust me on this one gune, levitate), that seems
utterly
beyond any rational world you inhabit on a day by day basis.


sunfish (even Sunfish) oh, OH, OHHH!!!....... ROFLMAO, how
hilarious... little s, BIG S ..... Oh, Geeze... stop it, you're
killing me....... ROFLMAO, again.


Can you do that with any other letters?


--



Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC
is located.
http://www.southharbourvillageinn.linksysnet.com Real Time
Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats
at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide

gune shows us -- though I am sure did not intend so -- that he can google, as
indicated by his use of a specific year.

there is no reason for him to know that unless he worked at the factory,
obviously not the case as shown by his lack of mentioning it and his lack of
understanding between a Sunfish and a sunfish.

I believe (meaning I could be wrong) that all
production Sunfish from sometime in the late '50's or early '60's were
fiberglass.

Maybe we had old boats... they were wood. The date you are reaching
for is 1959.