Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 12th 19, 03:43 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,520
Default Wow - more gun controls!

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 12th 19, 04:31 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 33,480
Default Wow - more gun controls!

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.


I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 12th 19, 05:23 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,520
Default Wow - more gun controls!

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:31:59 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.


I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


The Dems will impress a lot of unknowing folks with their vocal 'we're for gun control' stance.
  #4   Report Post  
Old February 12th 19, 05:48 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,438
Default Wow - more gun controls!

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.


I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized. I don't have
mags of more than 10 round capacity for any of my *serious* firearms,
though they are easy enough to buy. Ammo is still expensive, and loading
more than 10 rounds at a time seems conducive to shooting more of it off
at a faster rate than is necessary for fun. You certainly don't need
more than 10 rounds in a mag to defend yourself, either. If you do, you
haven't spent enough time at the range.
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 12th 19, 06:11 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,520
Default Wow - more gun controls!

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:48:45 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.


I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized. I don't have
mags of more than 10 round capacity for any of my *serious* firearms,
though they are easy enough to buy. Ammo is still expensive, and loading
more than 10 rounds at a time seems conducive to shooting more of it off
at a faster rate than is necessary for fun. You certainly don't need
more than 10 rounds in a mag to defend yourself, either. If you do, you
haven't spent enough time at the range.


You've obviously never been confronted with several hundred zombies.


  #6   Report Post  
Old February 12th 19, 09:47 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 33,480
Default Wow - more gun controls!

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:23:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:31:59 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.


I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


The Dems will impress a lot of unknowing folks with their vocal 'we're for gun control' stance.


That is just a symptom of the "The government should do something"
people who would have the government "do things" even if they are
wrong.
  #7   Report Post  
Old February 13th 19, 01:18 AM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 33,480
Default Wow - more gun controls!

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:48:45 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.


I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized.


That was the problem they had in 93
How do you know which ones are pre ban and legal?
The new ones were supposed to be serialized but I bet only the cops
bought them.
OTOH the market was flooded with "pre ban" magazines and most were
chinese knock offs of the real thing that were still warm from the
stamping process. They sucked.
I bought a couple just padding out an order to get free shipping and I
left them on the bench at the range. Someone might have the patience
to tune them up but not me.
  #8   Report Post  
Old February 13th 19, 01:32 AM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,849
Default Wow - more gun controls!

wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:48:45 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to
score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding
citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter
criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized.


That was the problem they had in 93
How do you know which ones are pre ban and legal?
The new ones were supposed to be serialized but I bet only the cops
bought them.
OTOH the market was flooded with "pre ban" magazines and most were
chinese knock offs of the real thing that were still warm from the
stamping process. They sucked.
I bought a couple just padding out an order to get free shipping and I
left them on the bench at the range. Someone might have the patience
to tune them up but not me.


I haven’t seen any serialized mags in any caliber

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Gun Controls! I can't wait... John H.[_5_] General 18 January 4th 16 05:02 PM
Mainsail Controls Bart ASA 35 October 1st 07 11:50 PM
help with mercury controls sonofadocker Boat Building 1 June 5th 06 07:12 PM
old merc, controls Chris General 4 July 8th 04 04:19 PM
OUtboard Controls.. I have a Johnson.. Ordered the controls and they say "MERC " on them? [email protected] General 1 May 12th 04 12:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017