Wow - more gun controls!
 

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

Wow - more gun controls!
 

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.

Wow - more gun controls!
 

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:31:59 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.

The Dems will impress a lot of unknowing folks with their vocal 'we're for gun control' stance.

Wow - more gun controls!
 

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized. I don't have
mags of more than 10 round capacity for any of my *serious* firearms,
though they are easy enough to buy. Ammo is still expensive, and loading
more than 10 rounds at a time seems conducive to shooting more of it off
at a faster rate than is necessary for fun. You certainly don't need
more than 10 rounds in a mag to defend yourself, either. If you do, you
haven't spent enough time at the range.

Wow - more gun controls!
 

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:48:45 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized. I don't have
mags of more than 10 round capacity for any of my *serious* firearms,
though they are easy enough to buy. Ammo is still expensive, and loading
more than 10 rounds at a time seems conducive to shooting more of it off
at a faster rate than is necessary for fun. You certainly don't need
more than 10 rounds in a mag to defend yourself, either. If you do, you
haven't spent enough time at the range.

You've obviously never been confronted with several hundred zombies.

Wow - more gun controls!
 

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:23:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:31:59 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.

The Dems will impress a lot of unknowing folks with their vocal 'we're for gun control' stance.

That is just a symptom of the "The government should do something"
people who would have the government "do things" even if they are
wrong.

Wow - more gun controls!
 

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:48:45 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized.

That was the problem they had in 93
How do you know which ones are pre ban and legal?
The new ones were supposed to be serialized but I bet only the cops
bought them.
OTOH the market was flooded with "pre ban" magazines and most were
chinese knock offs of the real thing that were still warm from the
stamping process. They sucked.
I bought a couple just padding out an order to get free shipping and I
left them on the bench at the range. Someone might have the patience
to tune them up but not me.

Wow - more gun controls!
 

wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:48:45 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 2/12/19 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:43:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/polit...ill/index.html


"This is just more nonsense from anti-gun zealots who are looking to
score political points by
proposing legislation that would make criminals out of law-abiding
citizens exercising their
constitutional right to self-defense while doing nothing to deter
criminals from committing crimes."

After all, it does take less than about three seconds to change magazines.

I see a thriving market in "pre-ban" magazines, just like last time.


How would that work, since magazines aren't serialized.

That was the problem they had in 93
How do you know which ones are pre ban and legal?
The new ones were supposed to be serialized but I bet only the cops
bought them.
OTOH the market was flooded with "pre ban" magazines and most were
chinese knock offs of the real thing that were still warm from the
stamping process. They sucked.
I bought a couple just padding out an order to get free shipping and I
left them on the bench at the range. Someone might have the patience
to tune them up but not me.


I haven’t seen any serialized mags in any caliber

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.