On 4/7/2018 2:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 14:28:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 11:40 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.



Congress has become a joke and both parties are to blame.

Saw a short interview with a couple of Jr. Senators and
Congressmen who are serving their first terms in office.

Both admitted to a rude awakening in terms of how congress
really works compared to their previous, naive expectations.
It's all about pork barrel programs intended to get re-elected.
The best interests of the country are not close to being a priority.



===

So how can we get term limits on these rascals? They're not likely to
vote them in on their own.


Basically, we're screwed. Too bad there wasn't a citizen legislation
process similar to a citizen's arrest.

When you stop to think about it though, it's are own fault. We want and
support the pork barrel programs that our respective elected
representatives push for. The fact that they are also getting rich on
the bribes and "thank you" remunerations doesn't seem to bother anyone
unless they become too obvious to ignore.

The only person who has served in Congress in modern times who didn't
retire with a big, fat bank account that I can think of is possibly Joe
Biden, but even with him, you never know.

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:40:27 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.

Agreed, but that wasn't the point. The point was that most voters want their taxes to go down
instead of up.

On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:15:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 2:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 14:28:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 11:40 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.



Congress has become a joke and both parties are to blame.

Saw a short interview with a couple of Jr. Senators and
Congressmen who are serving their first terms in office.

Both admitted to a rude awakening in terms of how congress
really works compared to their previous, naive expectations.
It's all about pork barrel programs intended to get re-elected.
The best interests of the country are not close to being a priority.



===

So how can we get term limits on these rascals? They're not likely to
vote them in on their own.


Basically, we're screwed. Too bad there wasn't a citizen legislation
process similar to a citizen's arrest.

When you stop to think about it though, it's are own fault. We want and
support the pork barrel programs that our respective elected
representatives push for. The fact that they are also getting rich on
the bribes and "thank you" remunerations doesn't seem to bother anyone
unless they become too obvious to ignore.

The only person who has served in Congress in modern times who didn't
retire with a big, fat bank account that I can think of is possibly Joe
Biden, but even with him, you never know.



===

I'm thinking that one way to establish term limits is to convene a
constitutional convention but that could open up a whole other can of
worms. Surpring to me is that we are supposedly not that far away.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/were-surprisingly-close-to-a-new-constitutional-convention-bad-idea/2017/04/06/f6d5b76a-197d-11e7-855e-4824bbb5d748_story.html?utm_term=.bf5ef58a181a





---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

On 4/7/2018 4:00 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:15:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 2:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 14:28:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 11:40 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.



Congress has become a joke and both parties are to blame.

Saw a short interview with a couple of Jr. Senators and
Congressmen who are serving their first terms in office.

Both admitted to a rude awakening in terms of how congress
really works compared to their previous, naive expectations.
It's all about pork barrel programs intended to get re-elected.
The best interests of the country are not close to being a priority.



===

So how can we get term limits on these rascals? They're not likely to
vote them in on their own.


Basically, we're screwed. Too bad there wasn't a citizen legislation
process similar to a citizen's arrest.

When you stop to think about it though, it's are own fault. We want and
support the pork barrel programs that our respective elected
representatives push for. The fact that they are also getting rich on
the bribes and "thank you" remunerations doesn't seem to bother anyone
unless they become too obvious to ignore.

The only person who has served in Congress in modern times who didn't
retire with a big, fat bank account that I can think of is possibly Joe
Biden, but even with him, you never know.



===

I'm thinking that one way to establish term limits is to convene a
constitutional convention but that could open up a whole other can of
worms. Surpring to me is that we are supposedly not that far away.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/were-surprisingly-close-to-a-new-constitutional-convention-bad-idea/2017/04/06/f6d5b76a-197d-11e7-855e-4824bbb5d748_story.html?utm_term=.bf5ef58a181a



Think we could find 34 state legislators who are not as corrupt as the
ones in DC?

On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 16:49:17 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 4/7/2018 4:00 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:15:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 2:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 14:28:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 11:40 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.



Congress has become a joke and both parties are to blame.

Saw a short interview with a couple of Jr. Senators and
Congressmen who are serving their first terms in office.

Both admitted to a rude awakening in terms of how congress
really works compared to their previous, naive expectations.
It's all about pork barrel programs intended to get re-elected.
The best interests of the country are not close to being a priority.



===

So how can we get term limits on these rascals? They're not likely to
vote them in on their own.


Basically, we're screwed. Too bad there wasn't a citizen legislation
process similar to a citizen's arrest.

When you stop to think about it though, it's are own fault. We want and
support the pork barrel programs that our respective elected
representatives push for. The fact that they are also getting rich on
the bribes and "thank you" remunerations doesn't seem to bother anyone
unless they become too obvious to ignore.

The only person who has served in Congress in modern times who didn't
retire with a big, fat bank account that I can think of is possibly Joe
Biden, but even with him, you never know.



===

I'm thinking that one way to establish term limits is to convene a
constitutional convention but that could open up a whole other can of
worms. Surpring to me is that we are supposedly not that far away.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/were-surprisingly-close-to-a-new-constitutional-convention-bad-idea/2017/04/06/f6d5b76a-197d-11e7-855e-4824bbb5d748_story.html?utm_term=.bf5ef58a181a



Think we could find 34 state legislators who are not as corrupt as the
ones in DC?

Perhaps in fly-over country. But there wouldn't be enough states!

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 15:20:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:40:27 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.

Agreed, but that wasn't the point. The point was that most voters want their taxes to go down
instead of up.

Yup and they want more "free" stuff. That is exactly the point of the
piece. As long as the people are too dumb to know that is not possible
and the politicians are afraid to tell them, we are doomed.
We have 2 or 3 generations of snowflakes who think there really is a
free lunch and they have lived their whole lives with nothing bad ever
happening to them.
As the last of the depression/WWII people die off, there is not even
anyone to tell them. Bad **** CAN happen and it is very likely it
will, probably before I die and certainly in my kid's life times.
The bubble that will bring us down is debt because you can't borrow
your way out of that one and that seems to be the only tool in the bag
other than austerity, not seen since the 30s.
Prior to the depression, our money was backed by gold and silver. Now
it is just backed by thoughts and prayers.

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 16:00:29 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:15:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 2:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 14:28:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/7/2018 11:40 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.



Congress has become a joke and both parties are to blame.

Saw a short interview with a couple of Jr. Senators and
Congressmen who are serving their first terms in office.

Both admitted to a rude awakening in terms of how congress
really works compared to their previous, naive expectations.
It's all about pork barrel programs intended to get re-elected.
The best interests of the country are not close to being a priority.



===

So how can we get term limits on these rascals? They're not likely to
vote them in on their own.


Basically, we're screwed. Too bad there wasn't a citizen legislation
process similar to a citizen's arrest.

When you stop to think about it though, it's are own fault. We want and
support the pork barrel programs that our respective elected
representatives push for. The fact that they are also getting rich on
the bribes and "thank you" remunerations doesn't seem to bother anyone
unless they become too obvious to ignore.

The only person who has served in Congress in modern times who didn't
retire with a big, fat bank account that I can think of is possibly Joe
Biden, but even with him, you never know.



===

I'm thinking that one way to establish term limits is to convene a
constitutional convention but that could open up a whole other can of
worms. Surpring to me is that we are supposedly not that far away.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/were-surprisingly-close-to-a-new-constitutional-convention-bad-idea/2017/04/06/f6d5b76a-197d-11e7-855e-4824bbb5d748_story.html?utm_term=.bf5ef58a181a


This would be such a food fight I doubt anyone in their right mind
would support it. The original constitution was ratified by the vote
of 2/3ds of the state legislatures. If that was still going to be the
rule, those big blue states would really have a problem. You only have
to look at the red/blue map to see where the trouble lies.

When Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota and Idaho have the same number of
votes as Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and California, expect a
lot of things not to go their way.

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 18:36:04 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 15:20:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:40:27 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:14:34 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:35:21 -0400, UseNet wrote:

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:18:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

From CNN no less...

"So why are Democrats struggling to grow their generic ballot advantage? Because they continue to
ignore three political realities: Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters
(especially in urban areas); most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up; and most voters
want the parties to work together when it makes sense. I'll give you examples of each:"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/30/opini...ons/index.html


-Most Americans aren't as liberal as their outraged base voters...

Well, that's number one and I don't know if the Democratic old guard
will ever get that. Maybe, in time, they will score points with the
millenials, but in reality, they millenials will most likely become
more conservative over time. In the meantime, they are playing up to a
minority of their own party that is out of touch with damn near
everybody and everything.

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

What taxes 'have to do' was not the statement. Most voters do not want taxes to go up is a true
statement, even though they would like the debt to go down.

The problem is congress refuses to cut spending. Every dollar they
spend is somebody's sacred caw and that translates into votes.

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
which is always followed by a dictatorship."

We seem to be rapidly approaching that crash.

Agreed, but that wasn't the point. The point was that most voters want their taxes to go down
instead of up.

Yup and they want more "free" stuff. That is exactly the point of the
piece. As long as the people are too dumb to know that is not possible
and the politicians are afraid to tell them, we are doomed.
We have 2 or 3 generations of snowflakes who think there really is a
free lunch and they have lived their whole lives with nothing bad ever
happening to them.
As the last of the depression/WWII people die off, there is not even
anyone to tell them. Bad **** CAN happen and it is very likely it
will, probably before I die and certainly in my kid's life times.
The bubble that will bring us down is debt because you can't borrow
your way out of that one and that seems to be the only tool in the bag
other than austerity, not seen since the 30s.
Prior to the depression, our money was backed by gold and silver. Now
it is just backed by thoughts and prayers.

Agreed.

Trouble is, the liberal side of the house wants higher taxes to buy votes, in my opinion, and that
does not lower the debt.

On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 17:45:45 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/7/18 9:35 AM, UseNet wrote:

- most voters want their taxes to go down instead of up

That's a pipe dream. With the raging deficit begun by Reagan and added
to each year since, especially a $1.2T debt created by the current
self avowed "king of debt," as in "I love debt...." Taxes will have
to go UP, just to pay the interest only. You can have that drunken,
feel-good, things will work out, rave... just know that the bar tab,
with interest, will come due.

The few dollars a pay period most actual working Americans might see
from the tax cut will be devoured by Trump's trade war if it comes to
pass with the PRC. Midwestern farmers are already paying a penalty
because Mexico is shopping other than in the USA to buy its corn and
other commodities, and there are serious shortages of Mexican farm
workers willing to risk crossing the border to do stoop labor in
California's crop fields. Food prices are going to go up, up, up as more
farms fail.


A problem with corn, is it is a food crop. But the Fed’s want it as an
energy crop. So little energy gain overall, does not overcome the extra
cost to sell it as food, especially in Mexico. Easy cure for the lack of
migrant workers. Bring back a modified Bracero program. Would also stop
most illegal immigration.

I'd wager that the "energy gain" is actually a environmental debt.