On 12/20/17 10:51 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:49:35 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:05:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 8:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:50:42 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document.

Sort of like how liberals read the constitution.



The Constitution can be interpreted, but how that is done is a matter of
law. That's nothing like interpreting the bible.

How so? Nine people in black robes decide what the words mean in a
huge leap of faith. You only have to look at the total reversals, like
Dred Scott or Schenck to see that.
That is not "a matter of law" as much as a sign of the times.
It is no more so than how people take passages of the bible and bend
them to their current beliefs.



Wow!

Never noticed that before?
It is yet to be seen which decisions might be overturned when Trump
gets to replace Ginsberg. (Bryer is getting pretty old too). If the
5-4s are a lock for "textualist" conservatives we may see lots of
things being revisited. There have been plenty of things read into the
constitution that are simply not there and things that have been
ignored that are there.



With a lot of luck, the Repubs will lose the House and maybe the Senate
next year. If the latter happens, Trump's ability to further **** on the
judiciary will be cut back, and he will not be able to name another
right-wing extremist to the Supremes.

It is funny that a conservative judge who actually wants to read the
constitution is a right wing extremist but a liberal judge who makes
up words that are not there is a normal jurist. Maybe that is normal
in your world. There is a process if you don't like what is written
there. Amend it. You are not supposed to just bend the meaning to suit
your politics.
In that regard isn't that exactly the way you say they are twisting
bible verse?



The Constitution has been re-interpreted since its first printing. If
your conservative jurists actually read the Constitution, the 2nd
Amendment "right" to bear arms would only pertain to those in
well-regulated militias.

The bible isn't endowed with the rule of law, anyway, despite
conservative attempts to make it so. It's nothing more than a book
compiled from disparate scrolls in the third and fourth centuries and
retranslated many times.

On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 10:40:07 UTC-4, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 09:44:37 UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 9:27 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 7:08:55 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 6:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 5:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:49:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:35:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/19/2017 12:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 12:36 PM, Tim wrote:

10:48 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/19/17 9:00 AM, justan wrote:
https://www.got questions.org/transsexualism-gender-identity-disor
der.html
Harry and Donny need to read this.


Transexualism is not mentioned in the bible, **** for brains.
...
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...ransgenderism/




I like the first two paragraphs-

Some would argue that the Bible says nothing about the
explosion of
the transgender phenomenon in the Western world. After all,
there is
no verse that says, Thou shalt not transition from a man to a
woman.
But neither are there any verses that talk explicitly about gun
violence, anorexia, waterboarding, fossil fuels, vaccines, GMOs,
HMOs,
or Pokemon Go. We should not expect the Bible to speak in 21st
century
terms to every 21st-century eventuality.

But that hardly means the Bible provides no guidance for Christians
trying to make sense of our transgender moment. In fact, when it
comes
to transgenderism, the Bible actually has a lot to say not by a
prooftext here or there but by a rich and pervasive
understanding of
gender and sexual identity.






Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe
this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document. Transgenderism
is an
easy issue for you fellas.


Yet you were the one who pointed out that transexualism is not
mentioned
in the Bible (with the added emphasis of "**** for brains").

Who's cherry picking it?


===

The bible does say to go forth and multiply, very difficult for the
LGBTQ community.


And once again, you demonstrate your ignorance. Gays have several ways
of conceiving and rearing children.

===

Your expertise regarding ignorance is profound indeed so I'll just
have to take your word for it that gay couples can conceive children
by themselves.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Never claimed that.



Harry, you really should fully depress your clutch before you shift into
reverse.



Perhaps if you were a more careful reader...

A gay woman can conceive via artificial insemination. She can also
conceive in the usual way, via sexual intercourse. That's two ways, and
that isn't the limit. A gay guy can adopt a child. Or he can impregnate
a woman the usual way. Or he can donate his sperm to a surrogate female.

As I stated, "Gays have several ways..." Got it? Do you need a diagram?

You said "Gays have several ways of conceiving..." All the ways you listed aren't "conceiving".

Why would gay people conceive in the "usual" way if they were gay? Wouldn't that be "gross"?


Conceiving via artificial insemination is conceiving. Conceiving via
intercourse is conceiving. Didn't they teach sex ed either in the
Carolinas?

I doubt if a gay woman who wanted to conceive and who had a male friend
willing to do his duty would consider it gross. Well, maybe if the male
friend were you...


~~Snerk~`
What woman would want JackOff's dribblings?


And the dribblings that fertilized you came from where?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Certainly not from any southern rednecks!

On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 10:56:39 UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/20/17 9:37 AM, justan wrote:
John H Wrote in message:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:08:51 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/19/17 6:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 5:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:49:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:35:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/19/2017 12:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 12:36 PM, Tim wrote:

10:48 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/19/17 9:00 AM, justan wrote:
https://www.got questions.org/transsexualism-gender-identity-disor
der.html
Harry and Donny need to read this.


Transexualism is not mentioned in the bible, **** for brains.
...
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...ransgenderism/




I like the first two paragraphs-

?Some would argue that the Bible says nothing about the
explosion of
the transgender phenomenon in the Western world. After all,
there is
no verse that says, ?Thou shalt not transition from a man to a
woman.?
But neither are there any verses that talk explicitly about gun
violence, anorexia, waterboarding, fossil fuels, vaccines, GMOs,
HMOs,
or Pokemon Go. We should not expect the Bible to speak in 21st
century
terms to every 21st-century eventuality.

But that hardly means the Bible provides no guidance for Christians
trying to make sense of our transgender moment. In fact, when it
comes
to transgenderism, the Bible actually has a lot to say?not by a
prooftext here or there but by a rich and pervasive
understanding of
gender and sexual identity.?






Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe
this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document. Transgenderism
is an
easy issue for you fellas.


Yet you were the one who pointed out that transexualism is not
mentioned
in the Bible (with the added emphasis of "**** for brains").

Who's cherry picking it?


===

The bible does say to go forth and multiply, very difficult for the
LGBTQ community.


And once again, you demonstrate your ignorance. Gays have several ways
of conceiving and rearing children.

===

Your expertise regarding ignorance is profound indeed so I'll just
have to take your word for it that gay couples can conceive children
by themselves.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Never claimed that.



Harry, you really should fully depress your clutch before you shift into
reverse.



Perhaps if you were a more careful reader...

A gay woman can conceive via artificial insemination. She can also
conceive in the usual way, via sexual intercourse. That's two ways, and
that isn't the limit. A gay guy can adopt a child. Or he can impregnate
a woman the usual way. Or he can donate his sperm to a surrogate female.

As I stated, "Gays have several ways..." Got it? Do you need a diagram?

None of those explain "...a gay couple who just had a baby, the old fashioned way."


Sounds like Harry encourages messing with mother nature aka God.
What woman would let a guy's penis, that regularly visits men's
corn holes, into her sacred zone?
This Harry fella sure gives me the creeps with his perverted state
of mind.


Sort of humorous that two of the scummiest low-lifes here, John Herring
and JustaPussy, bring up the bible, god, mother nature, sexuality, et
cetera.

Seems to be the M.O. of pseudo Christians.

True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 10:40:07 UTC-4, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 09:44:37 UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 9:27 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 7:08:55 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 6:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 5:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:49:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:35:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/19/2017 12:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 12:36 PM, Tim wrote:

10:48 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/19/17 9:00 AM, justan wrote:
https://www.got questions.org/transsexualism-gender-identity-disor
der.html
Harry and Donny need to read this.


Transexualism is not mentioned in the bible, **** for brains.
...
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...ransgenderism/




I like the first two paragraphs-

Some would argue that the Bible says nothing about the
explosion of
the transgender phenomenon in the Western world. After all,
there is
no verse that says, Thou shalt not transition from a man to a
woman.
But neither are there any verses that talk explicitly about gun
violence, anorexia, waterboarding, fossil fuels, vaccines, GMOs,
HMOs,
or Pokemon Go. We should not expect the Bible to speak in 21st
century
terms to every 21st-century eventuality.

But that hardly means the Bible provides no guidance for Christians
trying to make sense of our transgender moment. In fact, when it
comes
to transgenderism, the Bible actually has a lot to say not by a
prooftext here or there but by a rich and pervasive
understanding of
gender and sexual identity.






Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe
this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document. Transgenderism
is an
easy issue for you fellas.


Yet you were the one who pointed out that transexualism is not
mentioned
in the Bible (with the added emphasis of "**** for brains").

Who's cherry picking it?


===

The bible does say to go forth and multiply, very difficult for the
LGBTQ community.


And once again, you demonstrate your ignorance. Gays have several ways
of conceiving and rearing children.

===

Your expertise regarding ignorance is profound indeed so I'll just
have to take your word for it that gay couples can conceive children
by themselves.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Never claimed that.



Harry, you really should fully depress your clutch before you shift into
reverse.



Perhaps if you were a more careful reader...

A gay woman can conceive via artificial insemination. She can also
conceive in the usual way, via sexual intercourse. That's two ways, and
that isn't the limit. A gay guy can adopt a child. Or he can impregnate
a woman the usual way. Or he can donate his sperm to a surrogate female.

As I stated, "Gays have several ways..." Got it? Do you need a diagram?

You said "Gays have several ways of conceiving..." All the ways you listed aren't "conceiving".

Why would gay people conceive in the "usual" way if they were gay? Wouldn't that be "gross"?


Conceiving via artificial insemination is conceiving. Conceiving via
intercourse is conceiving. Didn't they teach sex ed either in the
Carolinas?

I doubt if a gay woman who wanted to conceive and who had a male friend
willing to do his duty would consider it gross. Well, maybe if the male
friend were you...


~~Snerk~`
What woman would want JackOff's dribblings?


And the dribblings that fertilized you came from where?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Certainly not from any southern rednecks!


Perhaps you need to do a DNA test to find out who your daddy is/was.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 12:21:46 UTC-4, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 10:40:07 UTC-4, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 09:44:37 UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 9:27 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 7:08:55 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 6:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 5:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:49:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:35:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/19/2017 12:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 12:36 PM, Tim wrote:

10:48 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/19/17 9:00 AM, justan wrote:
https://www.got questions.org/transsexualism-gender-identity-disor
der.html
Harry and Donny need to read this.


Transexualism is not mentioned in the bible, **** for brains.
...
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...ransgenderism/




I like the first two paragraphs-

Some would argue that the Bible says nothing about the
explosion of
the transgender phenomenon in the Western world. After all,
there is
no verse that says, Thou shalt not transition from a man to a
woman.
But neither are there any verses that talk explicitly about gun
violence, anorexia, waterboarding, fossil fuels, vaccines, GMOs,
HMOs,
or Pokemon Go. We should not expect the Bible to speak in 21st
century
terms to every 21st-century eventuality.

But that hardly means the Bible provides no guidance for Christians
trying to make sense of our transgender moment. In fact, when it
comes
to transgenderism, the Bible actually has a lot to say not by a
prooftext here or there but by a rich and pervasive
understanding of
gender and sexual identity.






Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria....believe
this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document. Transgenderism
is an
easy issue for you fellas.


Yet you were the one who pointed out that transexualism is not
mentioned
in the Bible (with the added emphasis of "**** for brains").

Who's cherry picking it?


===

The bible does say to go forth and multiply, very difficult for the
LGBTQ community.


And once again, you demonstrate your ignorance. Gays have several ways
of conceiving and rearing children.

===

Your expertise regarding ignorance is profound indeed so I'll just
have to take your word for it that gay couples can conceive children
by themselves.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Never claimed that.



Harry, you really should fully depress your clutch before you shift into
reverse.



Perhaps if you were a more careful reader...

A gay woman can conceive via artificial insemination. She can also
conceive in the usual way, via sexual intercourse. That's two ways, and
that isn't the limit. A gay guy can adopt a child. Or he can impregnate
a woman the usual way. Or he can donate his sperm to a surrogate female.

As I stated, "Gays have several ways..." Got it? Do you need a diagram?

You said "Gays have several ways of conceiving..." All the ways you listed aren't "conceiving".

Why would gay people conceive in the "usual" way if they were gay? Wouldn't that be "gross"?


Conceiving via artificial insemination is conceiving. Conceiving via
intercourse is conceiving. Didn't they teach sex ed either in the
Carolinas?

I doubt if a gay woman who wanted to conceive and who had a male friend
willing to do his duty would consider it gross. Well, maybe if the male
friend were you...


~~Snerk~`
What woman would want JackOff's dribblings?


And the dribblings that fertilized you came from where?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Certainly not from any southern rednecks!


Perhaps you need to do a DNA test to find out who your daddy is/was.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

You first, Justine.

On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 8:44:37 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 9:27 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 7:08:55 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 6:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 5:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:49:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:35:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/19/2017 12:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 12:36 PM, Tim wrote:

10:48 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/19/17 9:00 AM, justan wrote:
https://www.got questions.org/transsexualism-gender-identity-disor
der.html
Harry and Donny need to read this.


Transexualism is not mentioned in the bible, **** for brains.
...
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...ransgenderism/




I like the first two paragraphs-

“Some would argue that the Bible says nothing about the
explosion of
the transgender phenomenon in the Western world. After all,
there is
no verse that says, “Thou shalt not transition from a man to a
woman.�
But neither are there any verses that talk explicitly about gun
violence, anorexia, waterboarding, fossil fuels, vaccines, GMOs,
HMOs,
or Pokemon Go. We should not expect the Bible to speak in 21st
century
terms to every 21st-century eventuality.

But that hardly means the Bible provides no guidance for Christians
trying to make sense of our transgender moment. In fact, when it
comes
to transgenderism, the Bible actually has a lot to say—not by a
prooftext here or there but by a rich and pervasive
understanding of
gender and sexual identity.�






Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe
this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document. Transgenderism
is an
easy issue for you fellas.


Yet you were the one who pointed out that transexualism is not
mentioned
in the BibleÂ* (with the added emphasis of "**** for brains").

Who's cherry picking it?


===

The bible does say to go forth and multiply, very difficult for the
LGBTQ community.


And once again, you demonstrate your ignorance. Gays have several ways
of conceiving and rearing children.

===

Your expertise regarding ignorance is profound indeed so I'll just
have to take your word for it that gay couples can conceive children
by themselves.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Never claimed that.



Harry, you really should fully depress your clutch before you shift into
reverse.



Perhaps if you were a more careful reader...

A gay woman can conceive via artificial insemination. She can also
conceive in the usual way, via sexual intercourse. That's two ways, and
that isn't the limit. A gay guy can adopt a child. Or he can impregnate
a woman the usual way. Or he can donate his sperm to a surrogate female.

As I stated, "Gays have several ways..." Got it? Do you need a diagram?

You said "Gays have several ways of conceiving..." All the ways you listed aren't "conceiving".

Why would gay people conceive in the "usual" way if they were gay? Wouldn't that be "gross"?


Conceiving via artificial insemination is conceiving. Conceiving via
intercourse is conceiving. Didn't they teach sex ed either in the
Carolinas?

You listed "A gay guy can adopt a child." That's not conceiving.
Didn't they teach reading comprehension at Kansas Klown Kollege?

I doubt if a gay woman who wanted to conceive and who had a male friend
willing to do his duty would consider it gross. Well, maybe if the male
friend were you...

Heh. Now you're channeling lesbians.

True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 12:21:46 UTC-4, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 10:40:07 UTC-4, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 09:44:37 UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 9:27 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 7:08:55 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 6:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 5:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:49:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:35:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/19/2017 12:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 12:36 PM, Tim wrote:

10:48 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/19/17 9:00 AM, justan wrote:
https://www.got questions.org/transsexualism-gender-identity-disor
der.html
Harry and Donny need to read this.


Transexualism is not mentioned in the bible, **** for brains.
...
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...ransgenderism/




I like the first two paragraphs-

Some would argue that the Bible says nothing about the
explosion of
the transgender phenomenon in the Western world. After all,
there is
no verse that says, Thou shalt not transition from a man to a
woman.
But neither are there any verses that talk explicitly about gun
violence, anorexia, waterboarding, fossil fuels, vaccines, GMOs,
HMOs,
or Pokemon Go. We should not expect the Bible to speak in 21st
century
terms to every 21st-century eventuality.

But that hardly means the Bible provides no guidance for Christians
trying to make sense of our transgender moment. In fact, when it
comes
to transgenderism, the Bible actually has a lot to say not by a
prooftext here or there but by a rich and pervasive
understanding of
gender and sexual identity.






Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe
this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document. Transgenderism
is an
easy issue for you fellas.


Yet you were the one who pointed out that transexualism is not
mentioned
in the Bible (with the added emphasis of "**** for brains").

Who's cherry picking it?


===

The bible does say to go forth and multiply, very difficult for the
LGBTQ community.


And once again, you demonstrate your ignorance. Gays have several ways
of conceiving and rearing children.

===

Your expertise regarding ignorance is profound indeed so I'll just
have to take your word for it that gay couples can conceive children
by themselves.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Never claimed that.



Harry, you really should fully depress your clutch before you shift into
reverse.



Perhaps if you were a more careful reader...

A gay woman can conceive via artificial insemination. She can also
conceive in the usual way, via sexual intercourse. That's two ways, and
that isn't the limit. A gay guy can adopt a child. Or he can impregnate
a woman the usual way. Or he can donate his sperm to a surrogate female.

As I stated, "Gays have several ways..." Got it? Do you need a diagram?

You said "Gays have several ways of conceiving..." All the ways you listed aren't "conceiving".

Why would gay people conceive in the "usual" way if they were gay? Wouldn't that be "gross"?


Conceiving via artificial insemination is conceiving. Conceiving via
intercourse is conceiving. Didn't they teach sex ed either in the
Carolinas?

I doubt if a gay woman who wanted to conceive and who had a male friend
willing to do his duty would consider it gross. Well, maybe if the male
friend were you...


~~Snerk~`
What woman would want JackOff's dribblings?


And the dribblings that fertilized you came from where?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Certainly not from any southern rednecks!


Perhaps you need to do a DNA test to find out who your daddy is/was.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

You first, Justine.


I swear. I am not your daddy.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 9:40:07 AM UTC-5, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 09:44:37 UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 9:27 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 7:08:55 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 6:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 5:23 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:49:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:35:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/19/2017 12:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 12:36 PM, Tim wrote:

10:48 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/19/17 9:00 AM, justan wrote:
https://www.got questions.org/transsexualism-gender-identity-disor
der.html
Harry and Donny need to read this.


Transexualism is not mentioned in the bible, **** for brains.
...
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...ransgenderism/




I like the first two paragraphs-

Some would argue that the Bible says nothing about the
explosion of
the transgender phenomenon in the Western world. After all,
there is
no verse that says, Thou shalt not transition from a man to a
woman.
But neither are there any verses that talk explicitly about gun
violence, anorexia, waterboarding, fossil fuels, vaccines, GMOs,
HMOs,
or Pokemon Go. We should not expect the Bible to speak in 21st
century
terms to every 21st-century eventuality.

But that hardly means the Bible provides no guidance for Christians
trying to make sense of our transgender moment. In fact, when it
comes
to transgenderism, the Bible actually has a lot to say not by a
prooftext here or there but by a rich and pervasive
understanding of
gender and sexual identity.






Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe
this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document. Transgenderism
is an
easy issue for you fellas.


Yet you were the one who pointed out that transexualism is not
mentioned
in the Bible (with the added emphasis of "**** for brains").

Who's cherry picking it?


===

The bible does say to go forth and multiply, very difficult for the
LGBTQ community.


And once again, you demonstrate your ignorance. Gays have several ways
of conceiving and rearing children.

===

Your expertise regarding ignorance is profound indeed so I'll just
have to take your word for it that gay couples can conceive children
by themselves.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Never claimed that.



Harry, you really should fully depress your clutch before you shift into
reverse.



Perhaps if you were a more careful reader...

A gay woman can conceive via artificial insemination. She can also
conceive in the usual way, via sexual intercourse. That's two ways, and
that isn't the limit. A gay guy can adopt a child. Or he can impregnate
a woman the usual way. Or he can donate his sperm to a surrogate female.

As I stated, "Gays have several ways..." Got it? Do you need a diagram?

You said "Gays have several ways of conceiving..." All the ways you listed aren't "conceiving".

Why would gay people conceive in the "usual" way if they were gay? Wouldn't that be "gross"?


Conceiving via artificial insemination is conceiving. Conceiving via
intercourse is conceiving. Didn't they teach sex ed either in the
Carolinas?

I doubt if a gay woman who wanted to conceive and who had a male friend
willing to do his duty would consider it gross. Well, maybe if the male
friend were you...


~~Snerk~`
What woman would want JackOff's dribblings?


And the dribblings that fertilized you came from where?

The best part of donnie ran down his mamma's leg.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:05:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 8:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:50:42 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document.

Sort of like how liberals read the constitution.



The Constitution can be interpreted, but how that is done is a matter of
law. That's nothing like interpreting the bible.

How so? Nine people in black robes decide what the words mean in a
huge leap of faith. You only have to look at the total reversals, like
Dred Scott or Schenck to see that.
That is not "a matter of law" as much as a sign of the times.
It is no more so than how people take passages of the bible and bend
them to their current beliefs.



Wow!

Never noticed that before?
It is yet to be seen which decisions might be overturned when Trump
gets to replace Ginsberg. (Bryer is getting pretty old too). If the
5-4s are a lock for "textualist" conservatives we may see lots of
things being revisited. There have been plenty of things read into the
constitution that are simply not there and things that have been
ignored that are there.



With a lot of luck, the Repubs will lose the House and maybe the Senate
next year. If the latter happens, Trump's ability to further **** on the
judiciary will be cut back, and he will not be able to name another
right-wing extremist to the Supremes.


But left wing extremists are OK? How about a constitutionalist.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/20/17 10:51 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:49:35 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:05:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 8:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:50:42 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Pfffft. You Christians treat the bible like a cafeteria...believe this,
pick that, ignore those...it's a handy document.

Sort of like how liberals read the constitution.



The Constitution can be interpreted, but how that is done is a matter of
law. That's nothing like interpreting the bible.

How so? Nine people in black robes decide what the words mean in a
huge leap of faith. You only have to look at the total reversals, like
Dred Scott or Schenck to see that.
That is not "a matter of law" as much as a sign of the times.
It is no more so than how people take passages of the bible and bend
them to their current beliefs.



Wow!

Never noticed that before?
It is yet to be seen which decisions might be overturned when Trump
gets to replace Ginsberg. (Bryer is getting pretty old too). If the
5-4s are a lock for "textualist" conservatives we may see lots of
things being revisited. There have been plenty of things read into the
constitution that are simply not there and things that have been
ignored that are there.



With a lot of luck, the Repubs will lose the House and maybe the Senate
next year. If the latter happens, Trump's ability to further **** on the
judiciary will be cut back, and he will not be able to name another
right-wing extremist to the Supremes.

It is funny that a conservative judge who actually wants to read the
constitution is a right wing extremist but a liberal judge who makes
up words that are not there is a normal jurist. Maybe that is normal
in your world. There is a process if you don't like what is written
there. Amend it. You are not supposed to just bend the meaning to suit
your politics.
In that regard isn't that exactly the way you say they are twisting
bible verse?



The Constitution has been re-interpreted since its first printing. If
your conservative jurists actually read the Constitution, the 2nd
Amendment "right" to bear arms would only pertain to those in
well-regulated militias.

The bible isn't endowed with the rule of law, anyway, despite
conservative attempts to make it so. It's nothing more than a book
compiled from disparate scrolls in the third and fourth centuries and
retranslated many times.


Not if you include the Federalist Papers.