In article ,
says...

Let me ask you this then:

When Mueller completes his investigation and should he report that *no*
evidence exists that warrants any form of indictment of Trump, will you
be able to accept those findings? How about you, BOA?

Of course I'll accept Muellers's findings.
Unlike you, who didn't accept Comey's.

On 12/15/2017 3:05 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Let me ask you this then:

When Mueller completes his investigation and should he report that *no*
evidence exists that warrants any form of indictment of Trump, will you
be able to accept those findings? How about you, BOA?

Of course I'll accept Muellers's findings.
Unlike you, who didn't accept Comey's.


Thanks. I'll save your reply for future reference. :-)

BTW ... it now seems that even Comey didn't initially accept his own
announced findings.

Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Let me ask you this then:

When Mueller completes his investigation and should he report that *no*
evidence exists that warrants any form of indictment of Trump, will you
be able to accept those findings? How about you, BOA?

Of course I'll accept Muellers's findings.
Unlike you, who didn't accept Comey's.



Comey’s has already been shown to be tainted.

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:05:57 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Of course I'll accept Muellers's findings.
Unlike you, who didn't accept Comey's.

It turns out Comey's "findings" were changed by someone friendly to
the Clinton campaign.