Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida. I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. Gifts could have a couple scenarios. I am going to gift a 22 rifle that was my dad’s to my son in law. He already legally owns a pistol or two. One he bought and one was his dad’s service revolver. His late dad was an Los Angeles cop. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
On 12/1/17 12:17 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida. I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. Gifts could have a couple scenarios. I am going to gift a 22 rifle that was my dad’s to my son in law. He already legally owns a pistol or two. One he bought and one was his dad’s service revolver. His late dad was an Los Angeles cop. Gun laws seem incredibly inconsistent. If you buy a new rifle from a dealer in Maryland, there's only the federal instant check. When I sold a used rifle to a friend of a friend here in Maryland, I called the state police to see if there were paperwork or background requirements, and there were no federal requirements, either. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:11:10 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida. I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. The ATF Form 4473 allows the purchase of a gun as a gift without naming the recipient. How do you think all those Chicago boys get their guns? Boy gives momma the money, momma goes out of town (Chuck's Gun Shop maybe), buys the gun with all the correct answers on the 4473, and gives boy the gun. Amen. Hey, it was a 'gift'. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
On 12/1/2017 12:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida.Â* I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. I've often thought about that. Without a proper paper trail it seems it could get very cloudy as to where a gun came from and where it ends up. For that reason, I'd never purchase a gun and give it as a gift. I think all transactions should be through a FFL. If someone wants a gun they can do like the rest of us do ... apply, undergo a background check ... and become responsible and accountable for it's location. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/1/2017 12:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida.Â* I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. I've often thought about that. Without a proper paper trail it seems it could get very cloudy as to where a gun came from and where it ends up. For that reason, I'd never purchase a gun and give it as a gift. I think all transactions should be through a FFL. If someone wants a gun they can do like the rest of us do ... apply, undergo a background check ... and become responsible and accountable for it's location. And how much does this cost? |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
On 12/1/2017 2:44 PM, Bill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/1/2017 12:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida.Â* I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. I've often thought about that. Without a proper paper trail it seems it could get very cloudy as to where a gun came from and where it ends up. For that reason, I'd never purchase a gun and give it as a gift. I think all transactions should be through a FFL. If someone wants a gun they can do like the rest of us do ... apply, undergo a background check ... and become responsible and accountable for it's location. And how much does this cost? In Massachusetts it costs $100 and the permit is good for six years. $100 again to renew for another 6 years. Free over age of 70. Other than that, there are no additional charges to purchase a firearm other than the cost of the firearm itself. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/1/2017 2:44 PM, Bill wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/1/2017 12:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida.Â* I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. I've often thought about that. Without a proper paper trail it seems it could get very cloudy as to where a gun came from and where it ends up. For that reason, I'd never purchase a gun and give it as a gift. I think all transactions should be through a FFL. If someone wants a gun they can do like the rest of us do ... apply, undergo a background check ... and become responsible and accountable for it's location. And how much does this cost? In Massachusetts it costs $100 and the permit is good for six years. $100 again to renew for another 6 years. Free over age of 70. Other than that, there are no additional charges to purchase a firearm other than the cost of the firearm itself. Pretty expensive when someone already owns a firearm, and the receiver also owns firearms. Here you pay for the background check and the FFL transfer. So probably $75. We do not require a license to own a forearm in Calif. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
On 12/1/2017 6:06 PM, Bill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/1/2017 2:44 PM, Bill wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/1/2017 12:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/1/17 11:10 AM, wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500, wrote: nobody actually enforces the laws we have on guns. === I was pleasantly surprised to read about a couple of recent convictions in Florida.Â* I believe one was for lying on the purchase questionaire. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/15/fort-myers-woman-found-guilty-lying-firearms-dealers/ Another was for possession by a felon. https://www.winknews.com/2017/11/13/convicted-fort-myers-felon-receives-15-years-gun-possession/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not that this is the case with your cites, but I wonder sometimes about purchases of firearms as gifts for other people. I assume if the ultimate recipient is named on the paperwork, that person is checked out on the instant check, at least, though I would think the actual purchaser is also checked out. I've often thought about that. Without a proper paper trail it seems it could get very cloudy as to where a gun came from and where it ends up. For that reason, I'd never purchase a gun and give it as a gift. I think all transactions should be through a FFL. If someone wants a gun they can do like the rest of us do ... apply, undergo a background check ... and become responsible and accountable for it's location. And how much does this cost? In Massachusetts it costs $100 and the permit is good for six years. $100 again to renew for another 6 years. Free over age of 70. Other than that, there are no additional charges to purchase a firearm other than the cost of the firearm itself. Pretty expensive when someone already owns a firearm, and the receiver also owns firearms. Here you pay for the background check and the FFL transfer. So probably $75. We do not require a license to own a forearm in Calif. We don't pay for a background check every time we buy a firearm. The $100 we pay every six years is for the background check required for a permit. As long as the permit remains valid you can buy all the guns you want. There's a computer check made at the time of purchase to make sure nothing has changed (felony conviction, restraining order, etc.) but we don't pay for that. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Not guilty
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:26:20 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: We don't pay for a background check every time we buy a firearm. The $100 we pay every six years is for the background check required for a permit. As long as the permit remains valid you can buy all the guns you want. There's a computer check made at the time of purchase to make sure nothing has changed (felony conviction, restraining order, etc.) but we don't pay for that. In Florida that comes with the CCW. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt | General | |||
Blagojevic not guilty of 23 charges | General | |||
Conyers guilty... | General | |||
O.J. Guilty on All Counts. | ASA | |||
Jeff Morris is guilty. . . | ASA |