On 12/1/2017 12:17 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/1/17 8:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:33:03 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

The "not guilty" verdicts of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate for 1st or 2nd
degree murder and involuntary manslaughter by the jury in San Fransisco
certainly has frustrated many.Â* The judge charged the jury that they
could *not* consider his illegal immigrant status, the fact that he was
deported 6 times but returned and that he had multiple felony
convictions in their deliberations.

I think the family of Kathryn Steinle (who he shot and killed) should
file a civil lawsuit for "unlawful death", but not against Zarate.Â* He
has nothing to recover.

The suit should be brought against the city of San Fransisco and the
state of California for at least a billion dollars.Â* I think they should
charge the city and state for causing the unlawful death by maintaining
a "Sanctuary" status and releasing a convicted felon and illegal
immigrant back into the population in direct defiance of federal ICE
demands that he be held for pickup and deportation.

In a civil action the bar is "preponderance of evidence",Â* not "beyond
any reasonable doubt".



===

Good plan.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Lousy interpretation of what the law may do. Also, presenting evidence
of a prior criminal history typically is not something the prosecution
can bring up in a criminal case.


The perp is not a US citizen. The rights of a US citizen do not
necessarily apply.

You are just giving sanctuary cities and states a pass because they're a
progressive -liberal thing.