Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 10:50:59 AM UTC-4, wrote:
If your privacy is important to you, stay away from Google maps too. My wife had maps going to find a hiking trail. Hours later we stopped for lunch at a restaurant in town. I paid cash and we did not use the phone there but an hour later she got a text from Google asking her to rate the restaurant. Wow. That's pretty invasive. I just switched to DuckDuckGo. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 10:50:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: If your privacy is important to you, stay away from Google maps too. My wife had maps going to find a hiking trail. Hours later we stopped for lunch at a restaurant in town. I paid cash and we did not use the phone there but an hour later she got a text from Google asking her to rate the restaurant. Wow. That's pretty invasive. I just switched to DuckDuckGo. It is not the map, it is location services. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 11:40:47 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 10:50:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: If your privacy is important to you, stay away from Google maps too. My wife had maps going to find a hiking trail. Hours later we stopped for lunch at a restaurant in town. I paid cash and we did not use the phone there but an hour later she got a text from Google asking her to rate the restaurant. Wow. That's pretty invasive. I just switched to DuckDuckGo. That's cool. I didn't know there was such a thing... https://www.google.com/search?q=duck...hrome&ie=UTF-8 |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:08:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 11:40:47 AM UTC-5, wrote: On Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 10:50:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: If your privacy is important to you, stay away from Google maps too. My wife had maps going to find a hiking trail. Hours later we stopped for lunch at a restaurant in town. I paid cash and we did not use the phone there but an hour later she got a text from Google asking her to rate the restaurant. Wow. That's pretty invasive. I just switched to DuckDuckGo. That's cool. I didn't know there was such a thing... https://www.google.com/search?q=duck...hrome&ie=UTF-8 I just read this: "DuckDuckGo has a well-established hold on the “private search” market. Its users are extremely loyal to the private search engine. It is feature rich for a privacy-focused tool, which not a lot of privacy tools are. It has a sleek and modern feeling design which makes for a user-friendly experience. All of this is great but it’s still not Google. Google is superior in almost every way, except that Google tracks you and your searches. However, since DuckDuckGo has these privacy flaws, it’s just not worth switching from Google." https://medium.com/searchencrypt/i-f...o-9558877ae170 I suppose I'll just stick with Google. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 8:55 AMJohn H - show quoted text - I just read this: "DuckDuckGo has a well-established hold on the “private search” market. Its users are extremely loyal to the private search engine. It is feature rich for a privacy-focused tool, which not a lot of privacy tools are. It has a sleek and modern feeling design which makes for a user-friendly experience. All of this is great but it’s still not Google. Google is superior in almost every way, except that Google tracks you and your searches. However, since DuckDuckGo has these privacy flaws, it’s just not worth switching from Google." https://medium.com/searchencrypt/i-f...o-9558877ae170 I suppose I'll just stick with Google. ....... Me to but it’s nice to know there are options out there |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
8:55 AMJohn H - show quoted text - I just read this: "DuckDuckGo has a well-established hold on the “private search” market. Its users are extremely loyal to the private search engine. It is feature rich for a privacy-focused tool, which not a lot of privacy tools are. It has a sleek and modern feeling design which makes for a user-friendly experience. All of this is great but it’s still not Google. Google is superior in almost every way, except that Google tracks you and your searches. However, since DuckDuckGo has these privacy flaws, it’s just not worth switching from Google." https://medium.com/searchencrypt/i-f...o-9558877ae170 I suppose I'll just stick with Google. ...... Me to but it’s nice to know there are options out there Bing maps are better. More like the old Google maps that gave time between stops. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:08:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 11:40:47 AM UTC-5, wrote: On Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 10:50:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: If your privacy is important to you, stay away from Google maps too. My wife had maps going to find a hiking trail. Hours later we stopped for lunch at a restaurant in town. I paid cash and we did not use the phone there but an hour later she got a text from Google asking her to rate the restaurant. Wow. That's pretty invasive. I just switched to DuckDuckGo. That's cool. I didn't know there was such a thing... https://www.google.com/search?q=duck...hrome&ie=UTF-8 This is an interesting read https://spreadprivacy.com/google-filter-bubble-study/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Satan and the evil | Tall Ships | |||
Bush = Dr. Evil? | ASA | |||
Props are Evil | General | |||
I´m an evil pirate | General | |||
Bush = Evil | ASA |