On 8/9/16 9:28 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 8:37:40 AM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/9/16 8:25 AM, Tim wrote:

6:51 AMPoquito Loco
- hide quoted text -
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:03:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:34 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:47:23 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:41:46 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:16:41 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:39 AM, wrote:

I am right in the middle of that culture here in northern Michigan.
Lots of hunters here


Might be "sporting" if the deer could be trained and armed to shoot back...

I don't really have a dog in this fight. I don't hunt. We walked about
5 miles today in the Manistee national forest but we didn't see anyone
shooting or really anything to shoot at. Yesterday we were near
Cadillac in a game preserve near Mitchell SP and the red squirrels
were pretty thick. I doubt the seasons are open here yet. They do
have hunter classes running in a lot of places.

Most of us don't hunt. But, I don't think those who do are 'bad' people for doing so. That's where
the dog in the fight comes in.

It's typical Krause, denigrating those who participate in an activity he doesn't enjoy.

I agree. I looked in on a couple of these classes and these are not
the Yahoos Harry would make them out to be and just finding a deer
that will let you get close enough to shoot them here is going to be
hard work.
This is not the petting zoo we have around our cities. It is rough
terrain and spooked animals. The "hiking trail" we were on was pretty
much wild woods.


My comments about "recreational hunting" have to do with those
participating in it considering it a "sport," albeit a blood sport. If
only the critters could shoot back...

Gosh, I've never seen anyone here refer to hunting as a 'sport', except you.
.....

Me either. But I think Harry likes catch and release "sport fishing". Where you reel the poor critter in, pull the hook, regardless how deep it set, and throw the thing back. But the poor fish is now either too wounded to live or too exhausted to survive.
But that's OK, though

Sport fishing. Yeah buddy!



I gave up fishing years ago.

When you got rid of your last boat.


Wrong again, JackOff

On 8/9/16 9:38 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:18:07 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:


I don't eat beef.

Really? Since when?


Several years.

On 8/9/16 9:42 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:03:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

I agree. I looked in on a couple of these classes and these are not
the Yahoos Harry would make them out to be and just finding a deer
that will let you get close enough to shoot them here is going to be
hard work.
This is not the petting zoo we have around our cities. It is rough
terrain and spooked animals. The "hiking trail" we were on was pretty
much wild woods.


My comments about "recreational hunting" have to do with those
participating in it considering it a "sport," albeit a blood sport. If
only the critters could shoot back...

Those farm animals are not armed either and they can't even run away


You did notice the words "recreational hunting" and "sport," right?

On 8/9/16 9:47 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 05:25:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Gosh, I've never seen anyone here refer to hunting as a 'sport', except you.

I imagine Harry thinks shooting water bottles is a sport. He sees
himself taking the gold



I also shoot paper and steel, and yes, target shooting is a sport.

8:42
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:03:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

I agree. I looked in on a couple of these classes and these are not
the Yahoos Harry would make them out to be and just finding a deer
that will let you get close enough to shoot them here is going to be
hard work.
This is not the petting zoo we have around our cities. It is rough
terrain and spooked animals. The "hiking trail" we were on was pretty
much wild woods.


My comments about "recreational hunting" have to do with those
participating in it considering it a "sport," albeit a blood sport. If
only the critters could shoot back...

Those farm animals are not armed either and they can't even run away
.....

It's ok that is as long as they're pre-assisinated.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/9/16 8:25 AM, Tim wrote:

6:51 AMPoquito Loco
- hide quoted text -
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:03:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:34 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:47:23 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:41:46 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:16:41 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:39 AM, wrote:

I am right in the middle of that culture here in northern Michigan.
Lots of hunters here


Might be "sporting" if the deer could be trained and armed to shoot back...

I don't really have a dog in this fight. I don't hunt. We walked about
5 miles today in the Manistee national forest but we didn't see anyone
shooting or really anything to shoot at. Yesterday we were near
Cadillac in a game preserve near Mitchell SP and the red squirrels
were pretty thick. I doubt the seasons are open here yet. They do
have hunter classes running in a lot of places.

Most of us don't hunt. But, I don't think those who do are 'bad'
people for doing so. That's where
the dog in the fight comes in.

It's typical Krause, denigrating those who participate in an activity he doesn't enjoy.

I agree. I looked in on a couple of these classes and these are not
the Yahoos Harry would make them out to be and just finding a deer
that will let you get close enough to shoot them here is going to be
hard work.
This is not the petting zoo we have around our cities. It is rough
terrain and spooked animals. The "hiking trail" we were on was pretty
much wild woods.


My comments about "recreational hunting" have to do with those
participating in it considering it a "sport," albeit a blood sport. If
only the critters could shoot back...

Gosh, I've never seen anyone here refer to hunting as a 'sport', except you.
.....

Me either. But I think Harry likes catch and release "sport fishing".
Where you reel the poor critter in, pull the hook, regardless how deep
it set, and throw the thing back. But the poor fish is now either too
wounded to live or too exhausted to survive.
But that's OK, though

Sport fishing. Yeah buddy!



I gave up fishing years ago.


Except at A&P

Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 8:37:40 AM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/9/16 8:25 AM, Tim wrote:
6:51 AMPoquito Loco
- hide quoted text -
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:03:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:34 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:47:23 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:41:46 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:16:41 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:39 AM, wrote:
I am right in the middle of that culture here in northern Michigan.
Lots of hunters here

Might be "sporting" if the deer could be trained and armed to shoot back...
I don't really have a dog in this fight. I don't hunt. We walked about
5 miles today in the Manistee national forest but we didn't see anyone
shooting or really anything to shoot at. Yesterday we were near
Cadillac in a game preserve near Mitchell SP and the red squirrels
were pretty thick. I doubt the seasons are open here yet. They do
have hunter classes running in a lot of places.
Most of us don't hunt. But, I don't think those who do are 'bad' people for doing so. That's where
the dog in the fight comes in.

It's typical Krause, denigrating those who participate in an activity he doesn't enjoy.
I agree. I looked in on a couple of these classes and these are not
the Yahoos Harry would make them out to be and just finding a deer
that will let you get close enough to shoot them here is going to be
hard work.
This is not the petting zoo we have around our cities. It is rough
terrain and spooked animals. The "hiking trail" we were on was pretty
much wild woods.

My comments about "recreational hunting" have to do with those
participating in it considering it a "sport," albeit a blood sport. If
only the critters could shoot back...
Gosh, I've never seen anyone here refer to hunting as a 'sport', except you.
.....

Me either. But I think Harry likes catch and release "sport fishing". Where you reel the poor critter in, pull the hook, regardless how deep it set, and throw the thing back. But the poor fish is now either too wounded to live or too exhausted to survive.
But that's OK, though

Sport fishing. Yeah buddy!


I gave up fishing years ago.
When you got rid of your last boat.
True.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/9/16 9:28 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 8:37:40 AM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/9/16 8:25 AM, Tim wrote:

6:51 AMPoquito Loco
- hide quoted text -
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:03:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:34 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:47:23 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:41:46 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:16:41 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 8/8/16 10:39 AM, wrote:

I am right in the middle of that culture here in northern
Michigan.
Lots of hunters here


Might be "sporting" if the deer could be trained and armed to
shoot back...

I don't really have a dog in this fight. I don't hunt. We
walked about
5 miles today in the Manistee national forest but we didn't see
anyone
shooting or really anything to shoot at. Yesterday we were near
Cadillac in a game preserve near Mitchell SP and the red
squirrels
were pretty thick. I doubt the seasons are open here yet. They do
have hunter classes running in a lot of places.

Most of us don't hunt. But, I don't think those who do are 'bad'
people for doing so. That's where
the dog in the fight comes in.

It's typical Krause, denigrating those who participate in an
activity he doesn't enjoy.

I agree. I looked in on a couple of these classes and these are not
the Yahoos Harry would make them out to be and just finding a deer
that will let you get close enough to shoot them here is going to be
hard work.
This is not the petting zoo we have around our cities. It is rough
terrain and spooked animals. The "hiking trail" we were on was
pretty
much wild woods.


My comments about "recreational hunting" have to do with those
participating in it considering it a "sport," albeit a blood
sport. If
only the critters could shoot back...

Gosh, I've never seen anyone here refer to hunting as a 'sport',
except you.
.....

Me either. But I think Harry likes catch and release "sport
fishing". Where you reel the poor critter in, pull the hook,
regardless how deep it set, and throw the thing back. But the poor
fish is now either too wounded to live or too exhausted to survive.
But that's OK, though

Sport fishing. Yeah buddy!



I gave up fishing years ago.

When you got rid of your last boat.


Wrong again, JackOff

Ok. Must have been before he got rid of the last boat.

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:09:36 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

I don't eat beef.

Really? Since when?


Several years.

Just beef or all meat?

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:10:15 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

Those farm animals are not armed either and they can't even run away


You did notice the words "recreational hunting" and "sport," right?

I guess your complaint make no sense. They call bowling a sport.
Nobody shoots at anyone on a baseball diamond. I shoot skeet but there
is nobody shooting back at me