On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:45
- show quoted text -
I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought
this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a
lousy $400k job.
...

Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road..,

I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone
but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says
his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was
caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being
there.
All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US
policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so
insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day
but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end.
In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do
believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be
sure that evidence "did not exist".

On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:45
- show quoted text -
I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought
this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a
lousy $400k job.
...

Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road..,

I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone
but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says
his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was
caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being
there.
All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US
policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so
insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day
but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end.
In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do
believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be
sure that evidence "did not exist".

When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime?

On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:45
- show quoted text -
I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought
this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a
lousy $400k job.
...

Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road..,

I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone
but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says
his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was
caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being
there.
All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US
policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so
insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day
but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end.
In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do
believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be
sure that evidence "did not exist".

When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime?

It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless
he was caught trying to cover it up.

On 5/7/16 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:45
- show quoted text -
I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought
this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a
lousy $400k job.
...

Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road..,

I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone
but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says
his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was
caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being
there.
All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US
policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so
insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day
but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end.
In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do
believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be
sure that evidence "did not exist".

When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime?

It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless
he was caught trying to cover it up.



Not to worry...while not all Trump supporters are racists, all the
racists will be voting for Trump. He has a lot of "influence" with racists.

On 5/7/2016 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:45
- show quoted text -
I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought
this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a
lousy $400k job.
...

Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road..,

I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone
but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says
his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was
caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being
there.
All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US
policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so
insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day
but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end.
In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do
believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be
sure that evidence "did not exist".

When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime?

It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless
he was caught trying to cover it up.

Is influence peddling impeachable?

On Sat, 7 May 2016 09:41:19 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/7/2016 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:45
- show quoted text -
I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought
this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a
lousy $400k job.
...

Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road..,

I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone
but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says
his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was
caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being
there.
All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US
policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so
insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day
but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end.
In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do
believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be
sure that evidence "did not exist".

When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime?

It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless
he was caught trying to cover it up.

Is influence peddling impeachable?

If you get caught it is. Selling out the American tax payer might be
the "highest" crime.

On Sat, 7 May 2016 09:18:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 5/7/16 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:45
- show quoted text -
I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought
this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a
lousy $400k job.
...

Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road..,

I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone
but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says
his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was
caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being
there.
All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US
policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so
insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day
but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end.
In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do
believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be
sure that evidence "did not exist".

When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime?

It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless
he was caught trying to cover it up.



Not to worry...while not all Trump supporters are racists, all the
racists will be voting for Trump. He has a lot of "influence" with racists.

Using your definition of racist, you should be very afraid.

Keyser Söze wrote:
A U.S. official familiar with the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s
email server stated that the FBI has found no evidence Clinton
intentionally violated the law, according to CNN. The investigation is
ongoing, however, and remains focused on the security of the server and
the handling of classified information.

The FBI has already interviewed several of Clinton’s aides, some more
than once, officials say. Clinton’s longtime adviser Huma Abedin
cooperated with the investigation, but her lawyers declined to comment
further on it. FBI investigators also interviewed former Clinton
employee Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the server and provided
documents and other materials under an immunity agreement.

A review of this material has similarly turned up no smoking gun thus
far. Investigators expect to complete their work within the next few
weeks, after which they will turn their findings over to the Justice
Department. The Justice Department will then make a determination on
whether to prosecute, but that likelihood has diminished significantly
as a result of these revelations.



Ignorance of the law is no excuse.