https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONRQZshyrPI

That was amusing. Hillary vs the Donald might make viewing the 'merican election almost worthwhile.

On 9/18/15 7:26 AM, True North wrote:
That was amusing. Hillary vs the Donald might make viewing the 'merican election almost worthwhile.


I don't know if you watched the Republican "debate" the other night. I
gave up after an hour because the bull**** they were spewing was just
too much to tolerate.

Calling these GOP POTUS wannabes unresponsive, unproductive,
unrealistic, and unimaginative about this nation's challenges is a gross
understatement.

Calling them a bunch of dangerous, demented, dip****, dumbass douchebags
is more accurate.

Any one of them would severely damage the country if elected.

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:43:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/18/15 7:26 AM, True North wrote:
That was amusing. Hillary vs the Donald might make viewing the 'merican election almost worthwhile.


I don't know if you watched the Republican "debate" the other night. I
gave up after an hour because the bull**** they were spewing was just
too much to tolerate.

Calling these GOP POTUS wannabes unresponsive, unproductive,
unrealistic, and unimaginative about this nation's challenges is a gross
understatement.

Calling them a bunch of dangerous, demented, dip****, dumbass douchebags
is more accurate.

Any one of them would severely damage the country if elected.

Scary isn't it?
Looking at the democrats isn't much more encouraging. You have a
corrupt, lying, neocon in Hillary who would have us in a middle east
war within a year and you have the communist from Vermont who would
crush the economy about as fast.
The rest are light weight governors who are about as qualified as
Pataki or Walker.

On 9/18/15 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:43:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/18/15 7:26 AM, True North wrote:
That was amusing. Hillary vs the Donald might make viewing the 'merican election almost worthwhile.


I don't know if you watched the Republican "debate" the other night. I
gave up after an hour because the bull**** they were spewing was just
too much to tolerate.

Calling these GOP POTUS wannabes unresponsive, unproductive,
unrealistic, and unimaginative about this nation's challenges is a gross
understatement.

Calling them a bunch of dangerous, demented, dip****, dumbass douchebags
is more accurate.

Any one of them would severely damage the country if elected.

Scary isn't it?
Looking at the democrats isn't much more encouraging. You have a
corrupt, lying, neocon in Hillary who would have us in a middle east
war within a year and you have the communist from Vermont who would
crush the economy about as fast.
The rest are light weight governors who are about as qualified as
Pataki or Walker.


Oh, I don't think Hillary is corrupt or a liar, any more than any of the
GOP candidates are that way and, in fact, I think she is less corrupt
and more honest than most of them. The bull**** the GOPers were spewing
about Planned Parenthood is evidence of their corruption and inability
to tell the truth.

Bernie Sanders is not a communist. He's just barely a socialist. Some of
his ideas would make it easier for low income earners to climb out of
the cellar. Further, of all the candidates, I think he is the most
decent and the most honest.

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:33:28 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/18/15 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:43:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/18/15 7:26 AM, True North wrote:
That was amusing. Hillary vs the Donald might make viewing the 'merican election almost worthwhile.


I don't know if you watched the Republican "debate" the other night. I
gave up after an hour because the bull**** they were spewing was just
too much to tolerate.

Calling these GOP POTUS wannabes unresponsive, unproductive,
unrealistic, and unimaginative about this nation's challenges is a gross
understatement.

Calling them a bunch of dangerous, demented, dip****, dumbass douchebags
is more accurate.

Any one of them would severely damage the country if elected.

Scary isn't it?
Looking at the democrats isn't much more encouraging. You have a
corrupt, lying, neocon in Hillary who would have us in a middle east
war within a year and you have the communist from Vermont who would
crush the economy about as fast.
The rest are light weight governors who are about as qualified as
Pataki or Walker.


Oh, I don't think Hillary is corrupt or a liar, any more than any of the
GOP candidates are that way and, in fact, I think she is less corrupt
and more honest than most of them.

Like I said, a race to the bottom. When your description is Not any
worse than the other guy, we are in trouble.


Bernie Sanders is not a communist. He's just barely a socialist. Some of
his ideas would make it easier for low income earners to climb out of
the cellar. Further, of all the candidates, I think he is the most
decent and the most honest.

Sanders believes
":From each according to his ability, to each according to his need"

Straight from Karl Marx.

On 9/18/2015 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:33:28 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/18/15 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:43:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/18/15 7:26 AM, True North wrote:
That was amusing. Hillary vs the Donald might make viewing the 'merican election almost worthwhile.


I don't know if you watched the Republican "debate" the other night. I
gave up after an hour because the bull**** they were spewing was just
too much to tolerate.

Calling these GOP POTUS wannabes unresponsive, unproductive,
unrealistic, and unimaginative about this nation's challenges is a gross
understatement.

Calling them a bunch of dangerous, demented, dip****, dumbass douchebags
is more accurate.

Any one of them would severely damage the country if elected.

Scary isn't it?
Looking at the democrats isn't much more encouraging. You have a
corrupt, lying, neocon in Hillary who would have us in a middle east
war within a year and you have the communist from Vermont who would
crush the economy about as fast.
The rest are light weight governors who are about as qualified as
Pataki or Walker.


Oh, I don't think Hillary is corrupt or a liar, any more than any of the
GOP candidates are that way and, in fact, I think she is less corrupt
and more honest than most of them.

Like I said, a race to the bottom. When your description is Not any
worse than the other guy, we are in trouble.


Bernie Sanders is not a communist. He's just barely a socialist. Some of
his ideas would make it easier for low income earners to climb out of
the cellar. Further, of all the candidates, I think he is the most
decent and the most honest.

Sanders believes
":From each according to his ability, to each according to his need"

Straight from Karl Marx.



I get a kick out of Harry's "degrees" of honesty or corruption when
describing Hillary. He says, "I think she is less corrupt and more
honest than most of them.

There are no "degrees" of honesty or of being corrupt. The terms are
absolutes. One is either honest or not or corrupt or not.

Must be that liberal arts "abstract" thinking again.

Crazy as it sounds, Trump appears to be honest. Painfully so, but honest.

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:44:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Trump appears to be honest. Painfully so, but honest.

===

Not really. He *did* want to build casinos in Florida and Jeb Bush
was contacted either directly or indirectly by the Trump organization
to try and enlist his support.

On 9/18/2015 2:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:44:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Trump appears to be honest. Painfully so, but honest.

===

Not really. He *did* want to build casinos in Florida and Jeb Bush
was contacted either directly or indirectly by the Trump organization
to try and enlist his support.



I think we are going to see Trump fade pretty quickly now.

On 9/18/15 6:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/18/2015 2:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:44:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Trump appears to be honest. Painfully so, but honest.

===

Not really. He *did* want to build casinos in Florida and Jeb Bush
was contacted either directly or indirectly by the Trump organization
to try and enlist his support.



I think we are going to see Trump fade pretty quickly now.



Clearing the path for the simple-minded surgeon? Which one? Rand "I'm
Crazy" Paul or Ben "I know nothing" Carson?