On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

I am sure you would but you liked her husband in spite of all of the
things he did to screw your causes ("Unleashing" wall street, anti gay
legislation, deregulating banks, increasing tax benefits for raping
the corporate safety net, downsizing and off shoring jobs. etc).
If you like being screwed by bill, I am sure you will rationalize
being screwed by hillary.
It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat but he was a better
big business republican than GHW or Dole would have been.
The only real prosperity in the 90s was what showed up on corporate
bottom lines and a stock bubble. It was spun as being good for you and
me. It was phony profits based on selling off capital, offshoring jobs
and down sizing, not actual revenue growth. A significant part of
those profits were simply fraud.

I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

The Bushes call Bill the 4th Bush brother and if you stand back and
look at the policies, nothing has really changed much since Reagan
left office. The rhetoric is different but at the end of the day, we
are still doing most of the same things. To find differences, you need
to look at fairly insignificant fluff like gay marriage ... that Bill
was against. Hillary is going to be another wall street president and
you will make excuses for her just like you do for Bill, all the time
griping about banksters.

On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.



I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:22:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.

Sometimes the answer is just obvious.


I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

It is interesting that you always say I am wrong about things but you
don't seem to be able to say what part was wrong.
If both candidates are basically bought and paid for by the same
special interests, why shouldn't I cast a protest vote. Maybe, some
day, people will wake up and see what is going on.
Bernie is pointing that out fairly effectively.

On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 8:22:15 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.


LOL! give it up? like you consistently saying to Greg or I that Trump is of *Our* party?

Give it up, Harry.




I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

On 3/27/16 10:27 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 8:22:15 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.


LOL! give it up? like you consistently saying to Greg or I that Trump is of *Our* party?

Give it up, Harry.




I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
..

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

So what. The comment was appropriate.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.
My ex seriously considered moving back to her old house on South
Dakota avenue and selling the Clinton house because DC was a better
neighborhood.

On 3/28/16 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




The reality is that *every* place is a godless place, if you are
referring to the presence of an actual deity.

And didn't we once discover your county has a higher crime rate than
mine, and one might extrapolate that means more booze and drug use, too.
As for unwed birth rates, Florida's is right below DC's, and Maryland's
is lower than both. I would guess the rate in my county is lower than in
your county.