'Nuff said.

On 3/27/2016 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.

It's sad that there isn't a single candidate worthy of a thoughtful
intelligent vote.

On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states. Nice guy, though.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago

On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.


Which war she starts are you prepared to support?

On 3/27/16 3:55 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.


Which war she starts are you prepared to support?



Whichever one sends you, the other righties here, and your kids and
grandkids off to fight it.

In terms of rhetoric, Hillary is far less likely to start a new war than
your boys Trump and Cruz.

On 3/27/2016 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states.

Nice guy, though.

Oh Keys, that's so sensitive of you. I, I, could almost cry! lol.
Mikek