Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:45:51 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote: FlautentJim farts... "Mostly they robbed and pillaged, in keeping with their heritage as penal colonists." Duh! You're getting us mixed up with Australia. Our early settlers were the cream of the crop. Y'all got the ungrateful motley crew that couldn't wait to bite the hand that fed and protected y'all. We had a problem with paying taxes and not getting that much in return. Some here still do. |
#52
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
#53
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:43:04 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/8/15 2:38 PM, wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:45:51 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: FlautentJim farts... "Mostly they robbed and pillaged, in keeping with their heritage as penal colonists." Duh! You're getting us mixed up with Australia. Our early settlers were the cream of the crop. Y'all got the ungrateful motley crew that couldn't wait to bite the hand that fed and protected y'all. We had a problem with paying taxes and not getting that much in return. Some here still do. The funniest comment, of course, came from your buddy, FlaJim, who apparently confused the English settlement of Canada with Australia's early history as an English penal colony. Yeah, public school, what do you expect ;-) |
#55
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:04:53 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:11:48 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 05:10:55 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: In the bitter cold, yes It's in the high 40 low 50s here which isn't bad, pretty comfortable actually. If it's really cold and I have to go out I'll wear some kind of make... probably. === It's a ffffreeezing 58 here this morning. No snow however but it feels like there should be. Gee, I guess we are farther inland. We got over 2 inches here http://gfretwell.com/ftp/2%20inches.jpg === Impressive, hope none of those "flakes" tore a whole in your roof. :-) |
#56
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:43:04 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/8/15 2:38 PM, wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:45:51 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: FlautentJim farts... "Mostly they robbed and pillaged, in keeping with their heritage as penal colonists." Duh! You're getting us mixed up with Australia. Our early settlers were the cream of the crop. Y'all got the ungrateful motley crew that couldn't wait to bite the hand that fed and protected y'all. We had a problem with paying taxes and not getting that much in return. Some here still do. The funniest comment, of course, came from your buddy, FlaJim, who apparently confused the English settlement of Canada with Australia's early history as an English penal colony. Yeah, public school, what do you expect ;-) And why did England establish penal colonies halfway around the world? Because the American Revolution stopped them from dumping their criminals in America and Canada. |
#57
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:52:29 -0500,
wrote: On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:04:53 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:11:48 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 05:10:55 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: In the bitter cold, yes It's in the high 40 low 50s here which isn't bad, pretty comfortable actually. If it's really cold and I have to go out I'll wear some kind of make... probably. === It's a ffffreeezing 58 here this morning. No snow however but it feels like there should be. Gee, I guess we are farther inland. We got over 2 inches here http://gfretwell.com/ftp/2%20inches.jpg === Impressive, hope none of those "flakes" tore a whole in your roof. :-) I was worried about snow load,. We are only designed for uplift. We had a light dusting over most of the yard this week http://gfretwell.com/ftp/light%20dusting.jpg |
#58
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:57:55 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:43:04 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/8/15 2:38 PM, wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:45:51 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: FlautentJim farts... "Mostly they robbed and pillaged, in keeping with their heritage as penal colonists." Duh! You're getting us mixed up with Australia. Our early settlers were the cream of the crop. Y'all got the ungrateful motley crew that couldn't wait to bite the hand that fed and protected y'all. We had a problem with paying taxes and not getting that much in return. Some here still do. The funniest comment, of course, came from your buddy, FlaJim, who apparently confused the English settlement of Canada with Australia's early history as an English penal colony. Yeah, public school, what do you expect ;-) And why did England establish penal colonies halfway around the world? Because the American Revolution stopped them from dumping their criminals in America and Canada. The biggest difference is they came here because they wanted to, not because they had to. insert African comment here |
#59
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:33:13 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 12/8/2015 10:20 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:44:00 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/8/2015 9:10 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/8/15 8:55 AM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:07:33 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/7/15 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:02:35 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: I think I mentioned here I sold my "Assault Weapon," my Colt AR 15, some months ago. It was a fine rifle, but the more I thought about what it was, the more it troubled me to own it. I replaced it with a more traditional-looking rifle that handles the same round, and I actually prefer using it with small magazines. My M1A looks like a traditional rifle. It is not really an assault rifle tho because it is not selective fire and it shoots a full sized cartridge. Ballistically the 7.62x51 is pretty much identical to the 30-06. You can shoot the same bullets at the same velocities, particularly if you use SAAMI .308 loadings but the milspec "ball" round is about the same. My "replacement" for the Colt is a Ruger Mini 14 "Ranch", the one with a black "plastic" (the plastic has a fancier name, but it is plastic to me) stock. I put a scope mount rail on it, and for the moment I have a red dot sight on the rifle. The only modification I've made so far is to send the trigger assembly out for a "full trigger job" to smooth and lighten the action. It shoots the stockpile of .223 and 5.56 ammo I have. For what it's worth, the Ruger Mini 14 *is* on the Highland Park list of banned assault weapons. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I didn't know that, but I'm not surprised. We have a crazy quilt of gun regulations. In Maryland, as has often been mentioned, if you buy a new AR15 type rifle, it has to have what is called a "heavy barrel," or HBAR. But there are no restrictions on the purchase of an AR10, a far more deadly black rifle that fires the 30 caliber military round. The Ruger Mini 14 is available here in Maryland without restriction, as is the Mini 30, which fires the "AK" round. Just for giggles I tried to find out if the Ruger Mini 14 is Massachusetts compliant on the web. Bottom line is ... I don't have a clue. Some sources say yes, others say no. I'd have to call a gun shop I guess to find out for sure but since I am not in the market for one, I won't bother. Wacko laws here. Something about "evil features". It seems you can have no more than one "evil feature". A flash hider counts as one. If it threads onto the barrel, apparently the threads count as another. Even the permits that are issued don't make sense. When I first obtained a permit it was called a "Class A". Apparently that has changed. It's now simply called a "License to Carry" and is defined as: "Permits the purchase, possession, transportation and carrying of all large and non-large-capacity handguns, rifles, shotguns and feeding devices a well as ammunition. This is the only license that allows the carrying of concealed handguns-either loaded or unloaded." Yet, a magazine of any type that can hold more than ten rounds is illegal. So, what's the point in having the permit allow "large" capacity handguns and rifles? The MA law regarding "large capacity" is as follows: "A large-capacity firearm is defined as a semi-automatic handgun or rifle that is capable of accepting more than ten rounds, OR is a semi-automatic shotgun capable of accepting more than five shotgun shells, OR is an assault weapon. So, my permit says I can legally own an assault weapon with a 30 round magazine but another section of the MA law says both are illegal to own. I just spent a few minutes looking myself. Apparently, the newer ones must be banned, as there are 'pre-ban' ones for sale in MA. http://www.armslist.com/posts/455823...1981-stainless I couldn't find any listing of banned rifles in MA. You're right, convoluted as hell. "Pre-ban" in Massachusetts refers to firearms manufactured before 1998 when the gun laws were radically changed. You can legally buy or sell a "pre-ban" firearm here but the catch is this: The firearm must have always been owned by a MA resident who kept the gun in MA. Same with selling ... can only sell a "pre-ban" to another current MA resident. All those laws help explain why Boston isn't in the top 100 most dangerous places. But, it doesn't explain why MA has seven other cities in the top 100. http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/nei...p100dangerous/ Of course, it may be that the roundabouts are the most dangerous things in MA. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#60
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:59:14 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/8/2015 9:11 AM, wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 05:10:55 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 6:35:58 AM UTC-6, wrote: On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:08:12 -0500, John H. wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:56:43 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 9:28:12 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/7/15 10:22 AM, Tim wrote: Harry this tells me that you got rid of a 50 yr of design assault rifle in leu of a 150 year old design assault rifle. Probably, but the replacement for the Colt looks like your run of the mill ordinary rifle. How are you feeling, by the way? On the road to recovery, I hope. Actually Im feeling rather well, thanks for asking. Yesterday, I went to the dr. for a follow up, and will start cardio-therapy at my local hospital next week. Still got a ways to go but the immediate dangers are over, at least that's the popular opinion... I would think some rabbit hunting would be good cardio-therapy. === Not if you do it in cold weather. There's something about exertion in the cold that seems to bring on heart attacks. In the bitter cold, yes It's in the high 40 low 50s here which isn't bad, pretty comfortable actually. If it's really cold and I have to go out I'll wear some kind of make... probably. === It's a ffffreeezing 58 here this morning. No snow however but it feels like there should be. Awwwwwe .... Walked out to the van yesterday morning and nearly fell on my ass due to the ice on the driveway. Cold here. 50's. Looks like rain. Supposed to rain tomorrow. Checked the boat yesterday. Snug in it's shelter. 60's here. Went for a nice motorcycle ride this afternoon. Lovely. But, I shouldn't have to be mowing the damn grass in December! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kauai Chickes and "Stand yer' Ground!!" | General | |||
In Chicago, Anti Assault Weapon Candidate Wins Special Election | General | |||
"Stand by me"... great arrangement... | General | |||
What does "PO" stand for? | Cruising | |||
Assault weapon ban enf not good enough | ASA |