Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2015
Posts: 920
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

True North wrote:

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 06:15:07 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

- show quoted text -
===

"Did your Canadian ancestors not hunt to survive? Â*I'm pretty sure they
did. Â*And what about that delightful custom of clubbing baby seals to
death that some of your countrymen seem to enjoy? "


"seem to enjoy"???
They were harvesting the seals for their pelts...so they could sell same
pelts and put food on the table for their families.


Even worse. Not killing for the meat.

  #43   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On 12/8/2015 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/8/2015 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 05:10:55 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 6:35:58 AM UTC-6,
wrote:
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:08:12 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:56:43 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 9:28:12 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/7/15 10:22 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry this tells me that you got rid of a 50 yr of design
assault rifle in leu of a 150 year old design assault rifle.


Probably, but the replacement for the Colt looks like your run of
the
mill ordinary rifle.

How are you feeling, by the way? On the road to recovery, I hope.

Actually Im feeling rather well, thanks for asking. Yesterday, I
went to the dr. for a follow up, and will start cardio-therapy at
my local hospital next week. Still got a ways to go but the
immediate dangers are over, at least that's the popular opinion...

I would think some rabbit hunting would be good cardio-therapy.

===

Not if you do it in cold weather. There's something about exertion in
the cold that seems to bring on heart attacks.

In the bitter cold, yes It's in the high 40 low 50s here which isn't
bad, pretty comfortable actually. If it's really cold and I have to
go out I'll wear some kind of make... probably.


===

It's a ffffreeezing 58 here this morning. No snow however but it
feels like there should be.


Awwwwwe ....

Walked out to the van yesterday morning and nearly fell on my ass due to
the ice on the driveway.


Are you getting freezing weather already?
  #44   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On 12/8/2015 12:31 PM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 12/8/2015 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/8/2015 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 05:10:55 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 6:35:58 AM UTC-6,
wrote:
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:08:12 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:56:43 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 9:28:12 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/7/15 10:22 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry this tells me that you got rid of a 50 yr of design
assault rifle in leu of a 150 year old design assault rifle.


Probably, but the replacement for the Colt looks like your run of
the
mill ordinary rifle.

How are you feeling, by the way? On the road to recovery, I hope.

Actually Im feeling rather well, thanks for asking. Yesterday, I
went to the dr. for a follow up, and will start cardio-therapy at
my local hospital next week. Still got a ways to go but the
immediate dangers are over, at least that's the popular opinion...

I would think some rabbit hunting would be good cardio-therapy.

===

Not if you do it in cold weather. There's something about exertion in
the cold that seems to bring on heart attacks.

In the bitter cold, yes It's in the high 40 low 50s here which isn't
bad, pretty comfortable actually. If it's really cold and I have to
go out I'll wear some kind of make... probably.

===

It's a ffffreeezing 58 here this morning. No snow however but it
feels like there should be.


Awwwwwe ....

Walked out to the van yesterday morning and nearly fell on my ass due to
the ice on the driveway.


Are you getting freezing weather already?



Many nights it has dropped into 20's. Been happening for a couple of
weeks. Days are still warming up though ... 40's, 50's.
It *is* December, after all.


  #45   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,756
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

FlautentJim farts...


"Mostly they robbed and pillaged, in keeping with their heritage as penal
colonists."



Duh! You're getting us mixed up with Australia.
Our early settlers were the cream of the crop. Y'all got the ungrateful motley crew that couldn't wait to bite the hand that fed and protected y'all.


  #47   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:08:08 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:


On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 06:15:07 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

- show quoted text -
===

"Did your Canadian ancestors not hunt to survive? Â*I'm pretty sure they
did. Â*And what about that delightful custom of clubbing baby seals to
death that some of your countrymen seem to enjoy? "


"seem to enjoy"???
They were harvesting the seals for their pelts...so they could sell same pelts and put food on the table for their families.


I see hypocrisy is not limited to Calvert County Maryland.
Tim was going to put that rabbit on his table too. If the fur was
valuable enough, he would sell that too.
  #48   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:33:13 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/8/2015 10:20 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:44:00 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 12/8/2015 9:10 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/8/15 8:55 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:07:33 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/7/15 11:59 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:02:35 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:


I think I mentioned here I sold my "Assault Weapon," my Colt AR 15,
some
months ago. It was a fine rifle, but the more I thought about what it
was, the more it troubled me to own it. I replaced it with a more
traditional-looking rifle that handles the same round, and I actually
prefer using it with small magazines.

My M1A looks like a traditional rifle. It is not really an assault
rifle tho because it is not selective fire and it shoots a full sized
cartridge. Ballistically the 7.62x51 is pretty much identical to the
30-06. You can shoot the same bullets at the same velocities,
particularly if you use SAAMI .308 loadings but the milspec "ball"
round is about the same.


My "replacement" for the Colt is a Ruger Mini 14 "Ranch", the one with a
black "plastic" (the plastic has a fancier name, but it is plastic to
me) stock. I put a scope mount rail on it, and for the moment I have a
red dot sight on the rifle. The only modification I've made so far is to
send the trigger assembly out for a "full trigger job" to smooth and
lighten the action. It shoots the stockpile of .223 and 5.56 ammo I
have.

For what it's worth, the Ruger Mini 14 *is* on the Highland Park list
of banned
assault weapons.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


I didn't know that, but I'm not surprised. We have a crazy quilt of gun
regulations. In Maryland, as has often been mentioned, if you buy a new
AR15 type rifle, it has to have what is called a "heavy barrel," or
HBAR. But there are no restrictions on the purchase of an AR10, a far
more deadly black rifle that fires the 30 caliber military round. The
Ruger Mini 14 is available here in Maryland without restriction, as is
the Mini 30, which fires the "AK" round.


Just for giggles I tried to find out if the Ruger Mini 14 is
Massachusetts compliant on the web. Bottom line is ... I don't have a
clue. Some sources say yes, others say no. I'd have to call a gun shop
I guess to find out for sure but since I am not in the market for one, I
won't bother.

Wacko laws here. Something about "evil features". It seems you can
have no more than one "evil feature". A flash hider counts as one.
If it threads onto the barrel, apparently the threads count as another.

Even the permits that are issued don't make sense. When I first obtained
a permit it was called a "Class A". Apparently that has changed. It's
now simply called a "License to Carry"
and is defined as:

"Permits the purchase, possession, transportation and carrying of all
large and non-large-capacity handguns, rifles, shotguns and feeding
devices a well as ammunition. This is the only license that allows the
carrying of concealed handguns-either loaded or unloaded."

Yet, a magazine of any type that can hold more than ten rounds is
illegal. So, what's the point in having the permit allow "large"
capacity handguns and rifles? The MA law regarding "large capacity"
is as follows:

"A large-capacity firearm is defined as a semi-automatic handgun or
rifle that is capable of accepting more than ten rounds, OR is a
semi-automatic shotgun capable of accepting more than five shotgun
shells, OR is an assault weapon.

So, my permit says I can legally own an assault weapon with a 30 round
magazine but another section of the MA law says both are illegal to own.


I just spent a few minutes looking myself. Apparently, the newer ones must be banned,
as there are 'pre-ban' ones for sale in MA.

http://www.armslist.com/posts/455823...1981-stainless

I couldn't find any listing of banned rifles in MA. You're right, convoluted as hell.


"Pre-ban" in Massachusetts refers to firearms manufactured before 1998
when the gun laws were radically changed. You can legally buy or sell a
"pre-ban" firearm here but the catch is this: The firearm must have
always been owned by a MA resident who kept the gun in MA. Same with
selling ... can only sell a "pre-ban" to another current MA resident.



I wonder how they regulate that? It sounds like a lot of stupid laws,
written by stupid people. You certainly make the case for why
registration and "titling" is not an attractive thing for most people.

  #50   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand

On 12/8/15 1:45 PM, True North wrote:
FlautentJim farts...


"Mostly they robbed and pillaged, in keeping with their heritage as penal
colonists."



Duh! You're getting us mixed up with Australia.
Our early settlers were the cream of the crop. Y'all got the ungrateful motley crew that couldn't wait to bite the hand that fed and protected y'all.


You wouldn't expect FlaJim to know that the first English colony in
North America was established in Canada, or that Canada is not
Australia, would you?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kauai Chickes and "Stand yer' Ground!!" Tim General 4 February 28th 14 05:01 AM
In Chicago, Anti Assault Weapon Candidate Wins Special Election F.O.A.D. General 9 March 2nd 13 05:41 PM
"Stand by me"... great arrangement... John H[_2_] General 0 October 19th 10 08:39 PM
What does "PO" stand for? Roger Long Cruising 1 May 31st 06 07:09 PM
Assault weapon ban enf not good enough Joe ASA 71 October 14th 04 10:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017