Are you really...
 

True North wrote:
On Friday, 28 August 2015 10:27:07 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/28/15 7:19 AM, True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles....

"Guy in charge of something. Lack with some iPad spelling robot."


What the 'ell? You getting an early start on the weekend binging, Swill?


Weekend, midweek, high noon, what's the difference? At least 75% of his
posts make absolutely no sense, with or without "spelling robot" induced
errors.

I agree wholeheartedly with this post!


Of course you do. It's a requirement, eh?

Are you really...
 

Alex
True North wrote:
Keyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 8/26/15 9:54 PM, Califbill wrote:
- show quoted text -
Hey Kalif..while you're at it, you may as well terminate the father
too....and what about both sets of grandparents?
I see you are showing your low IQ again. *The father is probably 22 years
old and has 25 kids. *At least castrate him.


"You come across as crazier almost every time you post. Seriously."



Kalif Swill has never recovered from that tumble off the roof.


"You lack original thoughts, dummy."


Ditzy Dan Kruger..... I'm more concerned with accuracy than trying to be creative. Y'all mistakenly expect me to be like your Repugnant hopefulls.

Are you really...
 

On 8/29/2015 11:49 PM, Alex wrote:
True North wrote:
On Friday, 28 August 2015 10:27:07 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/28/15 7:19 AM, True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles....

"Guy in charge of something. Lack with some iPad spelling robot."


What the 'ell? You getting an early start on the weekend
binging, Swill?


Weekend, midweek, high noon, what's the difference? At least 75% of his
posts make absolutely no sense, with or without "spelling robot" induced
errors.

I agree wholeheartedly with this post!


Of course you do. It's a requirement, eh?
They can't help it. They're Siamese twins joined at the butt hole. When
one poops, the other has to react.

Are you really...
 

On 8/30/2015 7:40 AM, True North wrote:
I'm more concerned with accuracy than trying to be creative.

You fail at both. If you wanted either, you chose the wrong role model
to mimic.

Are you really...
 

StinktJim farts...

"They can't help it. They're Siamese twins joined at the butt hole. When
one poops, the other has to react."



Hey Stinky, why do you always have s*it on your mind? Can't you even clean up your act for Sunday?

Are you really...
 

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:04:35 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 01:15:17 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/26/2015 7:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:40:19 -0400, John H.
wrote:

Nothing religious about it. It is life. It is human.

===

That's ridiculous. There's nothing human about a small collection of
cells that start multiplying.



The problem with that argument (which has been the common accepted
consensus until recently) is that it has been determined by scientists
that the small collection of multiplying cells contains all the DNA of a
human being and is certainly living and growing from the moment of
fertilization. Nothing religious about it at all.

===

It's still a philosophical/religious issue. There's nothing human
about a clump of DNA even though the potential is there. Trying to
pinpoint the exact moment a fetus becomes "human" is a more or less a
pointless exercise except for those who are dead set against abortion
on religious grounds. Why anyone would want to force a woman to bring
an unwanted baby into the world is beyond me.

I noted, upon my return, that you conveniently skipped this:

When do you consider a human life to exist?

"At the end of the 8th week, the elbows become obvious, the feet, hands and even the
fingers maybe distinguishable. The brain cavities are easily seen as large 'holes' in
the embryonic head. The heart rate has increased to 160 bpm and the heart covers
about 50% of the chest area. In some cases, it is possible to recognize the
fluid-filled stomach below the heart at the end of week 8."

Look at the 8 weeks scan. Is that just a 'collection of cells'?

http://baby2see.com/development/ultr...ans.html#week8

Yet that's pretty early in the pregnancy.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Are you really...
 

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:39:08 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:20:34 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I am not questioning the right of a woman to abort an unwanted
pregnancy. I *am* questioning the conventional wisdom as to when "life"
begins.

===

It's very easy to dance around that issue. It is your choice. The
generally accepted view of "life" however includes the ability to
survive on your own among other things. The notion that "life" is
present among a clump of multiplying cells is mostly a religious
thing. I have nothing against religion and people should be free to
believe what they want. The law however should be based on science
and generally accepted principles. The law has spoken with regard to
women's right to an abortion.

Letting religion take precedence over facts and science has led to all
sorts of mischief in the past including the notion that the sun and
planets revolved around the earth. People of science were persecuted
and sometimes executed if they disagreed with the church's position no
matter how demonstrably erroneous it was. We see the same thing today
with Darwin, evolution, brain death, the beginning of life, etc.

If your definition of 'life' had any meaning, then there would be none. Almost no
animal can survive on their own immediately after birth. For damn sure, no human can
do so.

That statement was not well thought out.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Are you really...
 

On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 12:37:20 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:04:35 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 01:15:17 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/26/2015 7:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:40:19 -0400, John H.
wrote:

Nothing religious about it. It is life. It is human.

===

That's ridiculous. There's nothing human about a small collection of
cells that start multiplying.



The problem with that argument (which has been the common accepted
consensus until recently) is that it has been determined by scientists
that the small collection of multiplying cells contains all the DNA of a
human being and is certainly living and growing from the moment of
fertilization. Nothing religious about it at all.

===

It's still a philosophical/religious issue. There's nothing human
about a clump of DNA even though the potential is there. Trying to
pinpoint the exact moment a fetus becomes "human" is a more or less a
pointless exercise except for those who are dead set against abortion
on religious grounds. Why anyone would want to force a woman to bring
an unwanted baby into the world is beyond me.

I noted, upon my return, that you conveniently skipped this:

When do you consider a human life to exist?

"At the end of the 8th week, the elbows become obvious, the feet, hands and even the
fingers maybe distinguishable. The brain cavities are easily seen as large 'holes' in
the embryonic head. The heart rate has increased to 160 bpm and the heart covers
about 50% of the chest area. In some cases, it is possible to recognize the
fluid-filled stomach below the heart at the end of week 8."

Look at the 8 weeks scan. Is that just a 'collection of cells'?

http://baby2see.com/development/ultr...ans.html#week8

Yet that's pretty early in the pregnancy.

===

Why anyone would want to force a woman to bring
an unwanted baby into the world is beyond me, particularly a woman who
had been raped, subject to incest, a pre-teen, etc.

Are you really...
 

On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 12:39:56 -0400, John H.
wrote:

Almost no
animal can survive on their own immediately after birth. For damn sure, no human can
do so.

That is a very "mammalian" response ;-)

Specieist !

Are you really...
 

On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:02:49 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

StinktJim farts...

"They can't help it. They're Siamese twins joined at the butt hole. When
one poops, the other has to react."



Hey Stinky, why do you always have s*it on your mind? Can't you even clean up your act for Sunday?

Actually, he had you on his mind. Why do you equate yourself with that stuff?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!