amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 10:52:10 -0500, amdx wrote:

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek

===

Mike, you are mud wrestling with a pig. The pig loves it and you'll
get dirty.

amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you
gave reasons.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 8/16/2015 11:18 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you
gave reasons.

And your point?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 8/16/15 3:51 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 11:18 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough
to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe
it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it
out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had
another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you
gave reasons.

And your point?


Gee, Mikey, I guess I just don't understand your problem. I watch Ms.
Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find it hard,
difficult or confusing.

On 8/16/2015 3:33 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:


I watch Ms.Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find
it hard,
difficult or confusing.

There is no surprise there.
Is it your contention I would believe otherwise?
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 3:33 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:


I watch Ms.Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find it hard,
difficult or confusing.

There is no surprise there.
Is it your contention I would believe otherwise?
Mikek

---

I''m not Fretwell, and therefore I don't know what you would believe. He's
the one with that very special ability. 😜


--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 8/16/2015 11:52 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to
call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe
it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


The mind is a terrible thing to waste; especially on a douchebag like
KKKrause,

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:11:20 -0400, Justan Olphat wrote:

On 8/16/2015 11:52 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to
call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe
it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


The mind is a terrible thing to waste; especially on a douchebag like
KKKrause,

A few folks haven't got the word yet.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!