In response to...
 

On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:15:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.

===

No one has posted more personal insults to this group than you.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.

In response to...
 

On 1/5/15 12:21 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:15:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.

===

No one has posted more personal insults to this group than you.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


It's your choice whether you want to be part of the solution here or
part of the problem. I haven't tossed a *personal* insult at anyone here
in weeks. Neither you, Herring, nor several others can honestly say that.

Have nice day.

In response to...
 

On 1/5/2015 12:21 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:15:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.

===

No one has posted more personal insults to this group than you.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


Keyser Harry Soze expects *all* to follow lockstep in his footprints.

While it's great that he singlehandedly reset the tone of the newsgroup,
it can't be expected that we forget all the damage he's done.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

In response to...
 

On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:25:47 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/5/15 12:21 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:15:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.

===

No one has posted more personal insults to this group than you.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


It's your choice whether you want to be part of the solution here or
part of the problem. I haven't tossed a *personal* insult at anyone here
in weeks. Neither you, Herring, nor several others can honestly say that.

Have nice day.


===

Have nice day yourself.

That said, when someone spends years leaving a trail of bull****
behind them, they shouldn't expect the smell to instantly disappear
just because they've been wearing a diaper for a few days.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.

In response to...
 

On 1/5/15 1:47 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:25:47 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/5/15 12:21 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:15:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.

===

No one has posted more personal insults to this group than you.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


It's your choice whether you want to be part of the solution here or
part of the problem. I haven't tossed a *personal* insult at anyone here
in weeks. Neither you, Herring, nor several others can honestly say that.

Have nice day.


===

Have nice day yourself.

That said, when someone spends years leaving a trail of bull****
behind them, they shouldn't expect the smell to instantly disappear
just because they've been wearing a diaper for a few days.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


How this newsgroup "smells" in 2015 will be up to you and others who
either put on a diaper (to steal your thought) and refrain from flinging
personal insults at other posters or...don't. Your behavior here is up
to you, no one else.

I'm heading out to a range this afternoon for a few hours to try out a
few firearms mods I started over the holidays and just completed.

Have nice day.

In response to...
 

On 1/5/15 2:05 PM, wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 19:16:09 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:42:38 -0500, KC wrote:

On 1/4/2015 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 10:22:21 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various
posts, I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

I am glad you warned us that your statement was going to be "Specious"
before you started writing it.

If the US is paying $6 Billion a year to prop up the zionists,

Who said we are supporting "Zionists"? Israel is a Nation or a State
isn't it?

It is a church masquerading as a state...

Now that is funny!

The only thing "funny" is watching you atheists justify spending
billions of federal dollars promoting this religious state and then
getting your pantries in a wad if someone wants to put up a nativity
scene at no cost to the government.


One more time:

I am not an atheist.

One more time:

This country has a long history of supporting nations with official and
semi-official religions.

One more time:

If you want to put up a nativity scene, do it on private property.

Have nice day.

In response to...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 10:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.

Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who believe differently.

It does not say one nation under Jesus. One national under Allahu Akbar
neither. What ever God floats your boat. Including the Prince of Atheism.
Is inclusive of all deities.


Not relevant or accurate. Those who pushed for the inclusion of the phrase were christians.
Fortunately a growing number of public schools have recognized the
religious *******ization of "the pledge" and have dropped it from morning
student activities. Religious expressionism has no place in the public schools.

Very relevant. May have been pushed by Christians, but does not specify
the God. Hell, even includes the God of bankruptcy.

In response to...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 10:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.

Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who believe differently.

It does not say one nation under Jesus. One national under Allahu Akbar
neither. What ever God floats your boat. Including the Prince of Atheism.
Is inclusive of all deities.


Not relevant or accurate. Those who pushed for the inclusion of the phrase were christians.
Fortunately a growing number of public schools have recognized the
religious *******ization of "the pledge" and have dropped it from morning
student activities. Religious expressionism has no place in the public schools.

In response to...
 

On 1/5/2015 12:25 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/5/15 12:21 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:15:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.

===

No one has posted more personal insults to this group than you.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


It's your choice whether you want to be part of the solution here or
part of the problem. I haven't tossed a *personal* insult at anyone here
in weeks. Neither you, Herring, nor several others can honestly say that.

Have nice day.



Your pleading falls on deaf ears. We have begged you for the very same
consideration for years here, over a decade. Usually when you do
something like this, there is an alternative reason and when that is
done you will revert back to your old self... Good luck though, my bets
are on about three more days tops...

In response to...
 

On 1/5/2015 1:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/5/15 1:47 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:25:47 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/5/15 12:21 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:15:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.

===

No one has posted more personal insults to this group than you.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


It's your choice whether you want to be part of the solution here or
part of the problem. I haven't tossed a *personal* insult at anyone here
in weeks. Neither you, Herring, nor several others can honestly say
that.

Have nice day.


===

Have nice day yourself.

That said, when someone spends years leaving a trail of bull****
behind them, they shouldn't expect the smell to instantly disappear
just because they've been wearing a diaper for a few days.

That's not an insult - it's a fact.


How this newsgroup "smells" in 2015 will be up to you and others who
either put on a diaper (to steal your thought) and refrain from flinging
personal insults at other posters or...don't. Your behavior here is up
to you, no one else.

I'm heading out to a range this afternoon for a few hours to try out a
few firearms mods I started over the holidays and just completed.

Have nice day.



Well, we are all talking about sextants and boats in other threads. If
you are gonna' be cool from now on, cool but it sounds like the same old
"do as I say harry" here.. do what you gotta' do, we will do what we
gotta' do....