Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:01 -0800, jps wrote:
Thank you for stepping out and making your thoughts known about gun control. You make a reasoned argument for common sense law. "I've shot (pun intended) my mouth off regarding my views on the need for reasonable gun control laws, basically supporting universal background checks, gun registration, a chain of custody record of ownership and standardization of the myriad state laws. I believe they should apply to both FFL dealer purchases and subsequent private sales." This is exactly the import of the referendum Washington voters just passed by 60%+. Our legislature is too weak to take it up so the citizens have done it for themselves. You would not believe the apoplexy demonstrated by gun owners here. You'd have thought they were being castrated while their kids were deep fat fried by "liberals." Common sense laws covering the sale of weapons needs to happen in this country, otherwise there's no chance of holding idiots, assholes and scumbags responsible for those same guns leaking into the hands of criminals. Background checks on every gun sale will help stem the flow of legal weapons into criminal hands. It's not a panacea, just a step along the way to a safer citizenry. Thanks for voicing your opinion. It was a great discussion. However, the failure of many to agree with Luddite caused a degree of frustration which resulted in some comments not taken well. It's a damn shame that a difference of opinion can't simply be accepted. Very sad! |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:03:06 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:01 -0800, jps wrote: Thank you for stepping out and making your thoughts known about gun control. You make a reasoned argument for common sense law. "I've shot (pun intended) my mouth off regarding my views on the need for reasonable gun control laws, basically supporting universal background checks, gun registration, a chain of custody record of ownership and standardization of the myriad state laws. I believe they should apply to both FFL dealer purchases and subsequent private sales." This is exactly the import of the referendum Washington voters just passed by 60%+. Our legislature is too weak to take it up so the citizens have done it for themselves. You would not believe the apoplexy demonstrated by gun owners here. You'd have thought they were being castrated while their kids were deep fat fried by "liberals." Common sense laws covering the sale of weapons needs to happen in this country, otherwise there's no chance of holding idiots, assholes and scumbags responsible for those same guns leaking into the hands of criminals. Background checks on every gun sale will help stem the flow of legal weapons into criminal hands. It's not a panacea, just a step along the way to a safer citizenry. Thanks for voicing your opinion. It was a great discussion. However, the failure of many to agree with Luddite caused a degree of frustration which resulted in some comments not taken well. It's a damn shame that a difference of opinion can't simply be accepted. Very sad! Political scientists working on behalf of parties have found ways to neatly divide us by issue. And we're suckers for allowing ourselves to be manipulated so expertly. Most of the American electorate sit somewhere in the middle and have the ability to see both sides of an issue, but the language that's proffered by the extremes is what gets adopted in the debate. I'm as guilty as any but I also know I sit significantly closer to the middle than what's estimated by most of the "righties" here. I really don't understand how people can be so obstinate about common sense gun control. The paranoia about being on a "list" is ridiculous. The government already knows everything they need to. Them knowing whether you own a gun isn't going to make any difference if they decide the constitution is obsolete. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:15:43 -0800, jps wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:03:06 -0500, Poco Loco wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:01 -0800, jps wrote: Thank you for stepping out and making your thoughts known about gun control. You make a reasoned argument for common sense law. "I've shot (pun intended) my mouth off regarding my views on the need for reasonable gun control laws, basically supporting universal background checks, gun registration, a chain of custody record of ownership and standardization of the myriad state laws. I believe they should apply to both FFL dealer purchases and subsequent private sales." This is exactly the import of the referendum Washington voters just passed by 60%+. Our legislature is too weak to take it up so the citizens have done it for themselves. You would not believe the apoplexy demonstrated by gun owners here. You'd have thought they were being castrated while their kids were deep fat fried by "liberals." Common sense laws covering the sale of weapons needs to happen in this country, otherwise there's no chance of holding idiots, assholes and scumbags responsible for those same guns leaking into the hands of criminals. Background checks on every gun sale will help stem the flow of legal weapons into criminal hands. It's not a panacea, just a step along the way to a safer citizenry. Thanks for voicing your opinion. It was a great discussion. However, the failure of many to agree with Luddite caused a degree of frustration which resulted in some comments not taken well. It's a damn shame that a difference of opinion can't simply be accepted. Very sad! Political scientists working on behalf of parties have found ways to neatly divide us by issue. And we're suckers for allowing ourselves to be manipulated so expertly. Most of the American electorate sit somewhere in the middle and have the ability to see both sides of an issue, but the language that's proffered by the extremes is what gets adopted in the debate. I'm as guilty as any but I also know I sit significantly closer to the middle than what's estimated by most of the "righties" here. I really don't understand how people can be so obstinate about common sense gun control. The paranoia about being on a "list" is ridiculous. The government already knows everything they need to. Them knowing whether you own a gun isn't going to make any difference if they decide the constitution is obsolete. I guess there's just a lot of us not ready to declare it obsolete. On the other side are those who think it 'just get's in the way'. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:22:00 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:15:43 -0800, jps wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:03:06 -0500, Poco Loco wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:01 -0800, jps wrote: Thank you for stepping out and making your thoughts known about gun control. You make a reasoned argument for common sense law. "I've shot (pun intended) my mouth off regarding my views on the need for reasonable gun control laws, basically supporting universal background checks, gun registration, a chain of custody record of ownership and standardization of the myriad state laws. I believe they should apply to both FFL dealer purchases and subsequent private sales." This is exactly the import of the referendum Washington voters just passed by 60%+. Our legislature is too weak to take it up so the citizens have done it for themselves. You would not believe the apoplexy demonstrated by gun owners here. You'd have thought they were being castrated while their kids were deep fat fried by "liberals." Common sense laws covering the sale of weapons needs to happen in this country, otherwise there's no chance of holding idiots, assholes and scumbags responsible for those same guns leaking into the hands of criminals. Background checks on every gun sale will help stem the flow of legal weapons into criminal hands. It's not a panacea, just a step along the way to a safer citizenry. Thanks for voicing your opinion. It was a great discussion. However, the failure of many to agree with Luddite caused a degree of frustration which resulted in some comments not taken well. It's a damn shame that a difference of opinion can't simply be accepted. Very sad! Political scientists working on behalf of parties have found ways to neatly divide us by issue. And we're suckers for allowing ourselves to be manipulated so expertly. Most of the American electorate sit somewhere in the middle and have the ability to see both sides of an issue, but the language that's proffered by the extremes is what gets adopted in the debate. I'm as guilty as any but I also know I sit significantly closer to the middle than what's estimated by most of the "righties" here. I really don't understand how people can be so obstinate about common sense gun control. The paranoia about being on a "list" is ridiculous. The government already knows everything they need to. Them knowing whether you own a gun isn't going to make any difference if they decide the constitution is obsolete. I guess there's just a lot of us not ready to declare it obsolete. On the other side are those who think it 'just get's in the way'. I think you misunderstand me. A rogue government can only do away with the constitution if they have buy in from the military. In that case, it doesn't matter how many guns you own. They have bigger. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On 11/14/2014 12:15 AM, jps wrote:
The guys in sandals are organized. You'd be cowering in your media room like all your neighbors, their wives and kids. This is America, Greg, not Afghanistan. Love the way you "middle of the road" kind of guys seem to act like the very far left... You need to get out more. Maybe in the gated community you live in, but not in the rest of the country... we don't bend over as easily as you all out on the crazy coast... |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On 11/14/2014 2:15 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:21:38 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:15:08 -0800, jps wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:33:21 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:47:02 -0800, jps wrote: I think you misunderstand me. A rogue government can only do away with the constitution if they have buy in from the military. In that case, it doesn't matter how many guns you own. They have bigger. How many times has the US military lost a war to guys in sandals with AK47s in the last half century? I think it was every ****ing time. They always had bigger guns. The guys in sandals are organized. You'd be cowering in your media room like all your neighbors, their wives and kids. This is America, Greg, not Afghanistan. We taught them and the Viet Cong most of what they know. The real difference is they are fighting for their own freedom and you can't underestimate that. I really do not believe this really means anything here because we are not going to ever get that far and the people in the army are, as a rule, the guns, guts and god folks who the left disdains. If there was a revolution, it would be more of a military coup than Washington sending the army against the hinterlands. The people who like oppressive government regulation, generally dodge the draft and would not even consider enlisting.. Right, and you'd organize yourselves into a fighting machine by connecting via Twitter? Command and control? Hierarchy? Leadership? Fantasies. You'd be on your own with a few neighbors. It'd be sad if your wife had to watch you succumb to your country's own military. You are as much of an idiot as harry. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On 11/14/14 10:35 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:15:26 -0800, jps wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:21:38 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:15:08 -0800, jps wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:33:21 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:47:02 -0800, jps wrote: I think you misunderstand me. A rogue government can only do away with the constitution if they have buy in from the military. In that case, it doesn't matter how many guns you own. They have bigger. How many times has the US military lost a war to guys in sandals with AK47s in the last half century? I think it was every ****ing time. They always had bigger guns. The guys in sandals are organized. You'd be cowering in your media room like all your neighbors, their wives and kids. This is America, Greg, not Afghanistan. We taught them and the Viet Cong most of what they know. The real difference is they are fighting for their own freedom and you can't underestimate that. I really do not believe this really means anything here because we are not going to ever get that far and the people in the army are, as a rule, the guns, guts and god folks who the left disdains. If there was a revolution, it would be more of a military coup than Washington sending the army against the hinterlands. The people who like oppressive government regulation, generally dodge the draft and would not even consider enlisting.. Right, and you'd organize yourselves into a fighting machine by connecting via Twitter? Command and control? Hierarchy? Leadership? Fantasies. You'd be on your own with a few neighbors. It'd be sad if your wife had to watch you succumb to your country's own military. That reading thing is not your bag I guess. Non responsive answer Harry A more responsive answer might require taking you gunnutzies seriously. -- Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s pro-birth. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, Richard!!!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:15:43 -0800, jps wrote:
The government already knows everything they need to. Them knowing whether you own a gun isn't going to make any difference if they decide the constitution is obsolete. === What you apparently fail to appreciate is that the government is abrogating the constitution slowly, inches at a time, and always with seemingly good intentions. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hey Richard... | General | |||
Hey Richard | General | |||
for Richard | General | |||
hey Richard. have you seen this? | General | |||
Think Richard made it? | ASA |