On 10/23/2014 5:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/23/2014 5:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/23/14 5:12 PM, KC wrote:
On 10/23/2014 4:00 PM, Tim wrote:
Harry, why would a 'right-wing' corp. make a machine to vote dem?


With due respect, you know harry is just drooling, why bother... lol...

Whoosh. Check out the corporate manufacturers and programming companies
of the newfangled electronic voting machines and get back to us, idiot.




The problem is there is no way of knowing how many other voters used
that particular machine and how many votes were recorded erroneously.

I suppose it really doesn't matter. It's like voting in Massachusetts.
If you're not a card carrying Democrat your vote really doesn't mean
anything.

We *do* occasionally elect a Republican governor once in a while though,
just to make life interesting.



The problem is that the democrats spend a lot of time in states years
before elections. Last election it was in particular Ohio and Penn. Ohio
with the IRS, Penn with voter fraud. And I don't care if there was no
criminal prosecution by Eric Holders Racist Dept, when you have voter
areas where 100 percent, of a 115% turnout voting for one candidate,
ballots were replaced or stuffed... it's voter fraud but you will never
get DOJ to do anything about it...