Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:42:32 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/13/2014 10:00 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:18:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Meanwhile, unskilled jobs will continue to decline. Higher education
will continue to be a prime prerequisite for those jobs that exist even
in small businesses. The days of expecting middle class wages and
enjoying a middle class lifestyle with nothing more than a high school
diploma are over.



===

I understand your point and half agree with your conclusion. There's
no question that skills are the key to a good job and competetive
compensation but there will always be people who manage to acquire
those skills in non-traditional ways. Additionally, there are
certains skills that have almost always been acquired through on the
job training and hard work. I'm thinking specifically of contractors,
electricians, cabinet makers, finish carpenters, specialty welders,
small business owners, oil field workers, etc.



I agree 100 percent. The requirement of training or an education may be
achieved in many ways. Schools are only one of the avenues.

The common denominators is the *will* to learn, grow and improve one's
station in life. My complaint is about those who seem to think that
success, measured at any level, is a right rather than an earned reward.



===

Absolutely right.

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

On 13 Aug 2014 16:17:06 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I am not really sure what those "college" jobs will be either. The
traditional job for a liberal arts major was middle management
somewhere. Without the "labor", you do not need that many managers.
Just like a lot of jobs, middle management and the infrastructure than
comes up around them, was replaced by computers.
Even before I left, IBM had stripped out several levels of management
completely. A lot of "offices" disappeared.
I agree educational requirements for jobs are higher but that is not
because the job demands that education, it is simply because there are
a glut of college educated people looking for a job.



As I said: revolution.

===

So after the inner city minorities kill off the rich and middle class,
aided by unemployed union members, and they destroy important parts of
the infrastructure, who will feed them then? Farming is hard work.
Your backyard might well become part of the tillable land, and your
home could certainly shelter at least 20 workers not to mention a few
cows on the lower level. The bolsheviks did not create a thriving
economy with their revolution. It took capitalists and free
enterprise to do that some 80 years later.

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 8/13/2014 8:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/12/14, 2:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:54:17 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:23:59 -0400, wrote:

if you have 30 million boomers liquidating their 401ks

===

I don't think liquidate is the right description. Those who have
made good investment decisions can do well with the just dividend
stream and capital gains, leaving the principal amount mostly
untouched.

The problem, is most of those retirees have little actual money /
income.
So they will have to cash in the retirement accounts for living. I read
somewhere that the average savings of a 50 year is less the $50,000.
They
are not going to get to the amount of savings by 66 to live off of the
dividend stream. In other words, most have made either bad investment
decisions, or saved little, or both. Those people who have driven
around
in leased Bimmers and MB's and living the good life on current income
are
probably a majority. Or they were lower income workers. Janitors, etc.

That is my thinking and to make things worse, these people will be
selling into a bear market, just to pay the rent.
That is a perpetual motion market crash in the making. Every
correction will be pushed down farther than it normally would be by
these subsistence sellers.

OTOH the rich will certainly have the opportunity to get richer since
they can sit on the side lines with a big bag of money and scoop up
the bargains when they think they see a bottom.
You just have to be sure you are invested in a fund with large cash
reserves and hope it is enough to get them over the hard times without
selling off stocks to cover withdrawals.
For me, I am already starting to take my profits on this bubble market
we are looking at right now.
I think this bubble is going to pop.



It won't happen in my lifetime, but this country is headed for a real
revolution. Whether is is peaceful or violent will only be revealed in
the future. Corporationists, greed, banksters and the trend to find the
cheapest labor for everything means the death of the middle class and
the end of the possibility of lower income groups being able to fight
their way into it. No more decent jobs with benefits, eventually no more
Social Security, no more nothing for the vast majority of Americans
beyond bleak subsistence living. Municipal services being privatized,
jails privatized, police forces gearing up with assault vehicles and
weaponry, and ignorant Americans thinking illegal Central and South
American immigrants are the cause of civilization's decline. It's a
perfect scenario for heads on pikes of the Koch Brothers types and a
real restructuring of America.



If history is a guide to the future a global conflict is likely ...
basically WWIII that will completely restructure how businesses operate
in the USA. It's inevitable.

Meanwhile, unskilled jobs will continue to decline. Higher education
will continue to be a prime prerequisite for those jobs that exist even
in small businesses. The days of expecting middle class wages and
enjoying a middle class lifestyle with nothing more than a high school diploma are over.

It isn't just "unskilled" jobs in decline in this country. We are headed
for a massive restructuring. Too much wealth is concentrated in the hands
of too few and it is getting worse.


It is partly the fault of academia. Wanting all high school programs to be
college prep. Killed off the industrial arts programs. At least in
California. And a union getting $50+ an hour for a job that takes less
skill than flipping burgers. How much skill to install lug nuts on an
assembly line. We priced America out of the labor market. Was ok when we
had massive iron ore deposits and steel mills, we could hide the excess
costs in less cost to ship, etc. but bad union decisions and bad corporate
decisions all add up to a disaster. We did not upgrade our steel mills
after WW2 while Germany and Japan rebuilt state of the art. Now we have
declining literacy. Kids that are never going to be college material, and
leaving school with out any skills. Low basic math, low reading skills.
Teachers than not pass a standardized HS graduation test. Teachers with
little practical knowledge trying to educate a bored restless group of
children, who are the kids of the first generation of low skill schools
products. How many teachers have anything but a very liberal arts degree?
How many can actually teach math and sciences?

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:00:58 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:18:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Meanwhile, unskilled jobs will continue to decline. Higher education
will continue to be a prime prerequisite for those jobs that exist even
in small businesses. The days of expecting middle class wages and
enjoying a middle class lifestyle with nothing more than a high school
diploma are over.



===

I understand your point and half agree with your conclusion. There's
no question that skills are the key to a good job and competetive
compensation but there will always be people who manage to acquire
those skills in non-traditional ways. Additionally, there are
certains skills that have almost always been acquired through on the
job training and hard work. I'm thinking specifically of contractors,
electricians, cabinet makers, finish carpenters, specialty welders,
small business owners, oil field workers, etc.

Harry is schizophrenic in this regard. On the one hand he touts
college for everyone and then he talks about how wonderful the
training is in the trade unions.

I tend to agree that some of the best job opportunities will lie in
the trades.

I know a lot of guys in skilled trades with four year college degrees.

Found out an English lit degree could not feed the family?

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

Califbill wrote:
F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:00:58 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:18:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Meanwhile, unskilled jobs will continue to decline. Higher education
will continue to be a prime prerequisite for those jobs that exist even
in small businesses. The days of expecting middle class wages and
enjoying a middle class lifestyle with nothing more than a high school
diploma are over.



===

I understand your point and half agree with your conclusion. There's
no question that skills are the key to a good job and competetive
compensation but there will always be people who manage to acquire
those skills in non-traditional ways. Additionally, there are
certains skills that have almost always been acquired through on the
job training and hard work. I'm thinking specifically of contractors,
electricians, cabinet makers, finish carpenters, specialty welders,
small business owners, oil field workers, etc.

Harry is schizophrenic in this regard. On the one hand he touts
college for everyone and then he talks about how wonderful the
training is in the trade unions.

I tend to agree that some of the best job opportunities will lie in
the trades.

I know a lot of guys in skilled trades with four year college degrees.

Found out an English lit degree could not feed the family?

Most of my liberal arts grad friends who have salaried jobs are earning mid
to high six figures...more than you ever earned in salary.

--
Posted from my iPhone

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:37:54 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/13/2014 9:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:


There are two ways to respond to your assessment. The first is to cast
the blame on those who have been successful and demand a cut of the
fruits of their labor.

The second is to qualify oneself via training and education for the jobs
that exist in a highly competitive world ... that is only becoming
*more* competitive.

For most, the second route was drilled into us as youngsters. Unlike
today, we were never taught to "expect" it due to some societal right.
The required education may be acquired in many ways. It doesn't
necessarily require daddy's fat checkbook.

I'd also add that it often takes many years of work to rise to the
"middle class" financial category. Some people seem to think it's a
"right" and should start as soon as you become an adult. I didn't
achieve a "middle class" lifestyle until well into my 30's.

If you believe the assessment made by millionaire media and author
types, I never have.
There is a story floating around the talk shows now that you need
$150,000 for the basic necessities of life ... what bull****!

10 years ago or so, the media claimed you needed $250k to live in the
Silicon Valley. BS like a lot of today's media.

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:
Califbill wrote:
F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:00:58 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:18:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Meanwhile, unskilled jobs will continue to decline. Higher education
will continue to be a prime prerequisite for those jobs that exist even
in small businesses. The days of expecting middle class wages and
enjoying a middle class lifestyle with nothing more than a high school
diploma are over.



===

I understand your point and half agree with your conclusion. There's
no question that skills are the key to a good job and competetive
compensation but there will always be people who manage to acquire
those skills in non-traditional ways. Additionally, there are
certains skills that have almost always been acquired through on the
job training and hard work. I'm thinking specifically of contractors,
electricians, cabinet makers, finish carpenters, specialty welders,
small business owners, oil field workers, etc.

Harry is schizophrenic in this regard. On the one hand he touts
college for everyone and then he talks about how wonderful the
training is in the trade unions.

I tend to agree that some of the best job opportunities will lie in
the trades.

I know a lot of guys in skilled trades with four year college degrees.

Found out an English lit degree could not feed the family?

Most of my liberal arts grad friends who have salaried jobs are earning mid
to high six figures...more than you ever earned in salary.


Jealous of those friends? And you have no idea of my salaried years! And
your friends, like your boat, are not typical.

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:59:32 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

F.O.A.D. wrote:

Most of my liberal arts grad friends who have salaried jobs are earning mid
to high six figures...more than you ever earned in salary.


Jealous of those friends? And you have no idea of my salaried years! And
your friends, like your boat, are not typical.

He must hate their guts since they are firmly in that 1% of the "rich"
that he vilifies here. (that starts somewhere between $500k and 550k)

There's that moronic right wing use of "hate" again.

--
Posted from my iPhone

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

wrote:
On 13 Aug 2014 16:17:05 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Harry is schizophrenic in this regard. On the one hand he touts
college for everyone and then he talks about how wonderful the
training is in the trade unions.

I tend to agree that some of the best job opportunities will lie in
the trades.

I know a lot of guys in skilled trades with four year college degrees.

That doesn't say much for the education then does it.

D'oh. Most of them got their degrees while working in the trades. You
know...intellectual pursuits. Close friend, a plumber, just got an M.A. in
philosophy. Apparently not everyone is satisfied ossifying mentally in SW
Florida.
--
Posted from my iPhone

Calculating S.S. benefit at 62 vs 66
 

wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:59:32 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

F.O.A.D. wrote:

Most of my liberal arts grad friends who have salaried jobs are earning mid
to high six figures...more than you ever earned in salary.


Jealous of those friends? And you have no idea of my salaried years! And
your friends, like your boat, are not typical.

He must hate their guts since they are firmly in that 1% of the "rich"
that he vilifies here. (that starts somewhere between $500k and 550k)

And are probably lawyers or government advisors. Advising the government
to overspend even more.