About Us

F*O*A*D

On 6/13/14, 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:17:55 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Did you hear that California Supreme Court handed down a ruling saying
that teacher tenure is contrary to a good public school education.

I posted the link to that story a few days ago. The unions out there are definitely ****ed, which in
itself means the judge made a good call.

That dog faced woman from the NEA certainly has her granny panties in
a wad. She was spitting on the camera on CNN the other day.
The argument was nonsense, just the same old thing about how hard it
is to figure out who the good teachers are.

You boys have no idea why tenure came about and why it is still needed.
You're clueless. Really.
Back in the day when I worked for the NEA, I tried making an argument
that binding arbitration might replace tenure some day, but, of course,
this country has done nothing but crap on working people since 1980 and
that isn't about to stop until there is no middle class left, and the
super rich have every ****ing dollar. I'm glad I won't be around to see
that, because the result will be violence beyond what happened in the
Russian Revolution.

--
If right-wing assholes could fly,
rec.boats would be an airport!

Mr. Luddite

On 6/13/2014 11:47 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 6/13/14, 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:17:55 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Did you hear that California Supreme Court handed down a ruling saying
that teacher tenure is contrary to a good public school education.

I posted the link to that story a few days ago. The unions out there
are definitely ****ed, which in
itself means the judge made a good call.

That dog faced woman from the NEA certainly has her granny panties in
a wad. She was spitting on the camera on CNN the other day.
The argument was nonsense, just the same old thing about how hard it
is to figure out who the good teachers are.

You boys have no idea why tenure came about and why it is still needed.
You're clueless. Really.
Back in the day when I worked for the NEA, I tried making an argument
that binding arbitration might replace tenure some day, but, of course,
this country has done nothing but crap on working people since 1980 and
that isn't about to stop until there is no middle class left, and the
super rich have every ****ing dollar. I'm glad I won't be around to see
that, because the result will be violence beyond what happened in the
Russian Revolution.

Like other legitimate incentives, tenure for teachers has lost it's
original purpose. Yesterday in a (TV) discussion that I watched it was
pointed out that in some cases tenure was earned after as little as 18
months of teaching. That makes no sense. It should be a minimum of
about 5 years to demonstrate the competency of the teacher.

H*a*r*r*o*l*d

On 6/13/2014 11:47 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 6/13/14, 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:17:55 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Did you hear that California Supreme Court handed down a ruling saying
that teacher tenure is contrary to a good public school education.

I posted the link to that story a few days ago. The unions out there
are definitely ****ed, which in
itself means the judge made a good call.

That dog faced woman from the NEA certainly has her granny panties in
a wad. She was spitting on the camera on CNN the other day.
The argument was nonsense, just the same old thing about how hard it
is to figure out who the good teachers are.

You boys have no idea why tenure came about and why it is still needed.
You're clueless. Really.
Back in the day when I worked for the NEA, I tried making an argument
that binding arbitration might replace tenure some day, but, of course,
this country has done nothing but crap on working people since 1980 and
that isn't about to stop until there is no middle class left, and the
super rich have every ****ing dollar. I'm glad I won't be around to see
that, because the result will be violence beyond what happened in the
Russian Revolution.

Are you saying that the unions haven't been doing their job?

Califbill

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 6/13/14, 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:17:55 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Did you hear that California Supreme Court handed down a ruling saying
that teacher tenure is contrary to a good public school education.

I posted the link to that story a few days ago. The unions out there
are definitely ****ed, which in
itself means the judge made a good call.

That dog faced woman from the NEA certainly has her granny panties in
a wad. She was spitting on the camera on CNN the other day.
The argument was nonsense, just the same old thing about how hard it
is to figure out who the good teachers are.

You boys have no idea why tenure came about and why it is still needed.
You're clueless. Really.
Back in the day when I worked for the NEA, I tried making an argument
that binding arbitration might replace tenure some day, but, of course,
this country has done nothing but crap on working people since 1980 and
that isn't about to stop until there is no middle class left, and the
super rich have every ****ing dollar. I'm glad I won't be around to see
that, because the result will be violence beyond what happened in the Russian Revolution.

The violence will come because both Republicans and especially the latest
Democrat have bankrupted this country. When the dollar fails, you better
have some security.

Califbill

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:56:28 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:38:20 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:43:28 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:04:20 -0700, jps wrote:

Inner city folks have been taught their chances of success are limited
by the color of their skin and their languge.

===

Language? Really?

What language is that?

You really that dense or do you just play dumb? Would you rather I
said elocution, syntax and vocabulary? Their communites are isolated
from greater society, not by choice.

How are their communities isolated from greater society? Do they not
have TV's, cable service, no smart phones? Aren't they taught be good
union teachers? Just how are they isolated from from greater society?

jps tends to ignore troublesome questions that get to the facts.

Did you hear that California Supreme Court handed down a ruling saying
that teacher tenure is contrary to a good public school education.

I posted the link to that story a few days ago. The unions out there are
definitely ****ed, which in
itself means the judge made a good call.

Our good friend is a retired teacher/administrator from the Oakland School
district. Probably 20 years ago, she stated there should be either tenure
or union, but not both. Yesterday was the state union talking head saying
they will get the ruling overturned. But he also stated it was easy to get
rid of bad teachers, which were only 1-3% of the total. Wrong on both
points, and hopefully wrong on the his first posit.

Poquito Loco

On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:20:42 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:

On 6/13/2014 11:47 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 6/13/14, 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:17:55 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Did you hear that California Supreme Court handed down a ruling saying
that teacher tenure is contrary to a good public school education.

I posted the link to that story a few days ago. The unions out there
are definitely ****ed, which in
itself means the judge made a good call.

That dog faced woman from the NEA certainly has her granny panties in
a wad. She was spitting on the camera on CNN the other day.
The argument was nonsense, just the same old thing about how hard it
is to figure out who the good teachers are.

You boys have no idea why tenure came about and why it is still needed.
You're clueless. Really.
Back in the day when I worked for the NEA, I tried making an argument
that binding arbitration might replace tenure some day, but, of course,
this country has done nothing but crap on working people since 1980 and
that isn't about to stop until there is no middle class left, and the
super rich have every ****ing dollar. I'm glad I won't be around to see
that, because the result will be violence beyond what happened in the
Russian Revolution.

Are you saying that the unions haven't been doing their job?

He doesn't know what the hell he's saying. If I had worked for the NEA, I'd sure not tell anyone. He
is correct about the government crapping on the middle class, especially since January 20, 2009.
Don't know how he can say on the 'super rich' have all the money. The 'poor' in this country would
be considered wealthy in countries with 'real' poor.

I think most of the time Krause is full of crap. Most of the time, I'm correct.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
It had to happen...	HK	General	3	March 31st 09 03:18 AM
It could happen to you.	JIMinFL	General	125	October 13th 05 05:58 PM
Can it happen here?	Jim.	General	6	April 22nd 05 12:45 PM
What has to happen until it will be enough?	[email protected]	General	29	April 21st 05 11:51 AM
Can it happen here?	Jim,	General	0	April 21st 05 01:03 AM

Menu

About Us