Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported
Osama bin Laden.


--
All that is left in the contemporary
Republican-Conservative-Christian-Tea Party is a majority of hate-filled
“basers” that cannot tolerate gays, blacks, latinos, students, women,
and non-Christians, and a small minority of “old-style” Republicans who
pretend to ignore morons like Ted Nugent and Sarah Palin, and the venom
their party leaders spew.

On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported

Osama bin Laden.



That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.

On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported

Osama bin Laden.



That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.


Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom fighters.

--
All that is left in the contemporary
Republican-Conservative-Christian-Tea Party is a majority of hate-filled
“basers” that cannot tolerate gays, blacks, latinos, students, women,
and non-Christians, and a small minority of “old-style” Republicans who
pretend to ignore morons like Ted Nugent and Sarah Palin, and the venom
their party leaders spew.

On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:35:48 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported



Osama bin Laden.







That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.





Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom fighters.



--


Depends on which side of the fence your on... at the moment.

On 3/2/14, 4:41 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:35:48 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported



Osama bin Laden.







That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.





Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom fighters.



--


Depends on which side of the fence your on... at the moment.


Ronnie Raygun was a great friend of the Iranian terrorists, too, and
also the closer to home "Contra" terrorists. One wonders when in his
presidency his brain turned to mush.

--
All that is left in the contemporary
Republican-Conservative-Christian-Tea Party is a majority of hate-filled
“basers” that cannot tolerate gays, blacks, latinos, students, women,
and non-Christians, and a small minority of “old-style” Republicans who
pretend to ignore morons like Ted Nugent and Sarah Palin, and the venom
their party leaders spew.

On 3/3/14, 12:09 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:35:48 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported

Osama bin Laden.



That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.


Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom fighters.

One man's terrorist is always someone else's freedom fighter. Take
Menachem Begin for example.

Another one might be Ho Chi Minh, FDR's freedom fighter, LBJ's
terrorist.
We even liked Castro for a while.


Minh was a freedom fighter whose country got ****ed by the French, the
Japanese, the French again and the Americans.

--
All that is left in the contemporary
Republican-Conservative-Christian-Tea Party is a majority of hate-filled
“basers” that cannot tolerate gays, blacks, latinos, students, women,
and non-Christians, and a small minority of “old-style” Republicans who
pretend to ignore morons like Ted Nugent and Sarah Palin, and the venom
their party leaders spew.

On 3/2/2014 11:09 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:35:48 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported

Osama bin Laden.



That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.


Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom fighters.

One man's terrorist is always someone else's freedom fighter. Take
Menachem Begin for example.

Another one might be Ho Chi Minh, FDR's freedom fighter, LBJ's
terrorist.
We even liked Castro for a while.


When FDR signed Medicare into law, it was supposed to be a loan which
was supposed to be paid back. Whatever became of that law? Betcha the
liberal democrats worked it over real good in exchange for votes.

On 3/3/2014 10:00 AM, HanK wrote:
On 3/2/2014 11:09 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:35:48 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported

Osama bin Laden.



That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.


Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom
fighters.

One man's terrorist is always someone else's freedom fighter. Take
Menachem Begin for example.

Another one might be Ho Chi Minh, FDR's freedom fighter, LBJ's
terrorist.
We even liked Castro for a while.


When FDR signed Medicare into law, it was supposed to be a loan which
was supposed to be paid back. Whatever became of that law? Betcha the
liberal democrats worked it over real good in exchange for votes.


Ummmm... FDR never signed Medicare or any type of health care system
into law. He signed the Social Security Act into law but it had no
health care provisions associated with it. He tried to generate
interest in a universal health care system as did subsequent
administrations but Congress never passed any of them until 1965 when
Medicare was signed into law by President Johnson.

On 3/3/2014 9:14 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/3/2014 10:00 AM, HanK wrote:
On 3/2/2014 11:09 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:35:48 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported

Osama bin Laden.



That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.


Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom
fighters.

One man's terrorist is always someone else's freedom fighter. Take
Menachem Begin for example.

Another one might be Ho Chi Minh, FDR's freedom fighter, LBJ's
terrorist.
We even liked Castro for a while.


When FDR signed Medicare into law, it was supposed to be a loan which
was supposed to be paid back. Whatever became of that law? Betcha the
liberal democrats worked it over real good in exchange for votes.


Ummmm... FDR never signed Medicare or any type of health care system
into law. He signed the Social Security Act into law but it had no
health care provisions associated with it. He tried to generate
interest in a universal health care system as did subsequent
administrations but Congress never passed any of them until 1965 when
Medicare was signed into law by President Johnson.

Was social security originally intended to be a loan?

On 3/3/2014 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:00:44 -0600, HanK wrote:

On 3/2/2014 11:09 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:35:48 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/2/14, 4:30 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:08:10 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ronald Reagan considered Nelson Mandela a terrorist but supported

Osama bin Laden.



That was way before bin Laden WAS a terrorist.


Heheheheh. Ronnie Raygun. Friend of terrorists, enemy of freedom fighters.

One man's terrorist is always someone else's freedom fighter. Take
Menachem Begin for example.

Another one might be Ho Chi Minh, FDR's freedom fighter, LBJ's
terrorist.
We even liked Castro for a while.


When FDR signed Medicare into law, it was supposed to be a loan which
was supposed to be paid back. Whatever became of that law? Betcha the
liberal democrats worked it over real good in exchange for votes.


FDR? Medicare? That was LBJ and it was always simply a wealth
transfer from the young to the old, just like FDR's Social Security.


It is interesting that when you really look at wealth you see the
people over 60 have several times as much money than those under 60
and we still get all the breaks

Not only are we ****ing away your inheritance, we are also taking your
salary.
Garmpa needs a new boat

Thanks kids!


Social Security was originally intended to be insurance. It provided
for a baseline income for the retired elderly who otherwise would not
have any source of income. Obviously things have changed over the
years ... people live longer and, in many cases, have investments,
savings and/or pension plans that provide a source of income in their
retirement years.

The rules for SS are going to have to be changed. A means test will
probably be the most logical way to determine benefits. It has only
been recently that SS has been redefined (unofficially) as an
entitlement or as a tax. SSI still stands for "Social Security
Insurance" and as insurance doesn't necessarily mean you automatically
get the benefits. We pay for health insurance, property insurance,
automobile insurance and we all hope we never have to collect on them.