On Saturday, 8 February 2014 22:08:39 UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:20:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:



There was nothing wrong with my post, Johnny.

I was just asking a simple question that you seem to be very uncomfortable with.



Don, the correcting of your erroneous assumptions and grammar/spelling is not a comfort indicator.

So.. all your weaseling around means the answer is ... YES...?

True North wrote:
On Saturday, 8 February 2014 22:08:39 UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:20:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:



There was nothing wrong with my post, Johnny.

I was just asking a simple question that you seem to be very uncomfortable with.



Don, the correcting of your erroneous assumptions and grammar/spelling
is not a comfort indicator.

So.. all your weaseling around means the answer is ... YES...?

Are you that knowledgeable about this subject? Your lifestyle?

Sorry Billy, I've never been involved with the US Army.....except to be exposed to Johnny and his behaviours in this newsgroup.

True North wrote:
Sorry Billy, I've never been involved with the US Army.....except to be
exposed to Johnny and his behaviours in this newsgroup.

You were a janitor living in bathrooms. Where did I say anything about the
US Army? You have a guilty conscious?

Now Billy, by repeating that janitor crap you've put yourself in the questionable company of Ingersoll and Dickson.

True North wrote:
Now Billy, by repeating that janitor crap you've put yourself in the
questionable company of Ingersoll and Dickson.

What were you for the "Crown" corp? You sure were not an executive.

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 14:05:53 -0600, Califbill wrote:

True North wrote:
Now Billy, by repeating that janitor crap you've put yourself in the
questionable company of Ingersoll and Dickson.

What were you for the "Crown" corp? You sure were not an executive.

I believe janitors were the ones with all the johnny mop familiarity.