On 1/17/2014 10:49 AM, Hank wrote:
On 1/17/2014 10:37 AM, KC wrote:


I think what he was saying was, the numbers for the younger crew on the
ship, is not an equal comparison to the general population.. That's what
I got anyway...


That's not what he said.


A more fair comparison might be to look at the numbers for 18-50 year
olds, who have full time jobs, pretty good nutrition (available), mostly
in reasonably good physical condition, etc.....

Yes but you need to add several more markers. Even then someone could
point out that the comparison wasn't fairly made.

I suppose... but this is just a usenet, not a courtroom