Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/14/14, 10:06 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/14/2014 6:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Reasonable, but I still think the "Force Command" (not commander) should be responsible for the safety of the Force.... Obviously you don't understand how the Navy chain of command works. No I don't... But imagine how cool it would be if you would educate us... When a ship is out in service, who is responsible for the safety of the crews? For the sake of argument lets say, the reports of contaminated drinking water are true, who is it that should have been watching for that, surely it's not the corporation or country we are going to help?? The captain of a vessel has sole responsibility for the safety of the crew and the ship. If something horrific happens, a lower ranking officer may be faulted if fault is involved, but that officer works under the direction of the captain. Period. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Straight Military Personnel with HIV... | General | |||
How much do they pay US military officers anyway? | General | |||
Known Risks | General | |||
OT The Military Salute | ASA | |||
( OT ) Albright: 'Our personnel were authorized to kill bin Laden' | General |