View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Mr. Luddite Mr. Luddite is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default I know military personnel are willing to take risks...

On 1/14/2014 10:06 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/14/2014 6:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:



Reasonable, but I still think the "Force Command" (not commander) should
be responsible for the safety of the Force....


Obviously you don't understand how the Navy chain of command works.



No I don't... But imagine how cool it would be if you would educate
us... When a ship is out in service, who is responsible for the safety
of the crews? For the sake of argument lets say, the reports of
contaminated drinking water are true, who is it that should have been
watching for that, surely it's not the corporation or country we are
going to help??



The Commanding Officer has the responsibility.

You are assuming that:

1. He didn't do what he was supposed to do and:
2. The lawsuit filed has any merit.

I repeat again ... to date the Navy, the CO, any of his crew members or
any of his superiors have *not* been named in the lawsuit.