Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #71   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,476
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:



Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it
would be overturned next week?





I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in
this



country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto
those



who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are
politicians.



Why do you listen to them?: I don't.





They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their

hate, their need to control.


The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about.

It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening....




It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box
passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women,
children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want
to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled
co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all,
you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the
draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food
on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how
"pro-life" these christian republican legislators are.


Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found*

--
Americans deserve better.
  #72   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 08:29:59 -0500, John H. wrote:

On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:55:38 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:11:01 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:54:03 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:44:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6,
This country has no state religion.



Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would
be overturned next week?


I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this
country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those
who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians.


A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that
is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are
that group!


You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that
force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those
groups forces you to have an abortion.

Ask that same question, but put yourself in the baby's place.



I have absolutely no problem forcing women to act in any way I deem
necessary if it fits my religion.....

.
John spoof


Yes, we know. Liberals do a lot of talking about how badly conservatives /Christians treat women.
But the statement you made says a lot. Being an atheist gives you all the latitude in the world for
how you treat women, doesn't it? Nothing you force on them would be contrary to your 'religion'.

But then, perhaps you're a Muslim, which would explain your statement.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


Spoof.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


Public Usenet Newsgroup Access? Who's doing the spoofing?

Your buried head gives you away. I see you, like the lil' squirt, don't have the gonads to address
the post...let alone use your own name.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


  #73   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

Hank© wrote:
On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:



Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it
would be overturned next week?





I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in
this



country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto
those



who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are
politicians.



Why do you listen to them?: I don't.





They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their

hate, their need to control.


The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about.

It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening....




It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box
passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women,
children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want
to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled
co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all,
you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the
draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food
on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how
"pro-life" these christian republican legislators are.


Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found*



Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while
dressing well.
  #74   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote:
Hank© wrote:
On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:



Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it
would be overturned next week?





I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in
this



country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto
those



who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are
politicians.



Why do you listen to them?: I don't.





They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their

hate, their need to control.


The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about.

It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening....




It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box
passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women,
children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want
to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled
co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all,
you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the
draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food
on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how
"pro-life" these christian republican legislators are.


Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found*



Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while
dressing well.


It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in
right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way
to control women, eh?



--
Religion: together we can find the cure.
  #75   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 144
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On 12/1/2013 12:18 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote:
Hank© wrote:
On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:



Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it
would be overturned next week?





I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in
this



country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto
those



who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are
politicians.



Why do you listen to them?: I don't.





They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion,
their

hate, their need to control.


The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about.

It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening....




It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box
passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women,
children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you
want
to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled
co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all,
you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the
draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food
on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate
how
"pro-life" these christian republican legislators are.


Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found*



Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper,
while
dressing well.


It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in
right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way
to control women, eh?



There are lots of head cases like you who giggle for no good reason.
What moves you to say the things you do is incomprehensible.

--
Americans deserve better.


  #76   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote:
Hank© wrote:
On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:



Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it
would be overturned next week?





I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in
this



country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto
those



who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are
politicians.



Why do you listen to them?: I don't.





They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their

hate, their need to control.


The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about.

It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening....




It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box
passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women,
children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want
to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled
co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all,
you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the
draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food
on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how
"pro-life" these christian republican legislators are.


Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found*



Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while
dressing well.


It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in
right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way
to control women, eh?




I see you showing your stupidity again. Changing the subject because you
are too stupid to stay on subject.
  #77   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 144
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On 12/1/2013 12:53 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote:
Hank© wrote:
On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:



Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it
would be overturned next week?





I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in
this



country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto
those



who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are
politicians.



Why do you listen to them?: I don't.





They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their

hate, their need to control.


The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about.

It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening....




It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box
passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women,
children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want
to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled
co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all,
you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the
draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food
on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how
"pro-life" these christian republican legislators are.


Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found*


Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while
dressing well.


It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in
right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way
to control women, eh?




I see you showing your stupidity again. Changing the subject because you
are too stupid to stay on subject.

He's stupid in so many ways. That's just one of them.

--
Americans deserve better.
  #78   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Banned
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,692
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 5:29:27 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

If you are hit by a car, you should pay for your own treatment...or burial.






Then hurry up and die, ****FACE.....
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Approval ratings not the best... John H[_11_] General 132 December 21st 09 12:59 AM
Water Treatment Jobs | Water Treatment Supplies | Wastewater Plant H2 Find General 0 December 2nd 09 06:59 AM
Lifesling2 approval Tamaroak General 0 February 26th 06 06:32 AM
Lifesling2 approval Tamaroak Cruising 0 February 26th 06 06:32 AM
MORE Angry White Females. Bertie the Bunyip ASA 0 July 31st 03 05:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017