Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:29:13 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

On Friday, 29 November 2013 11:55:02 UTC-4, wrote:
On Friday, November 29, 2013 10:52:22 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

snipped



Just like your little; concubine, Donnie.



Hey Dickson, didn't hear you bragging about your OctoberFest polka playin' gig this year.
Did the good folks in Kitchener finally wise up and find a band that could play and look decent for family entertainment?


Hey Squirt!!

Wazzup? More derogatory comments, I see. Are you pretending to be 'brave' for us? A 'brave' person
with a set of gonads would answer questions when he brings up his bull****.

Is it dark up there?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Friday, November 29, 2013 2:04:44 PM UTC-5, Hank© wrote:
On 11/29/2013 10:11 AM, John H. wrote:

On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 05:53:53 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:




On Friday, November 29, 2013 7:32:47 AM UTC-6, John H's spoofer wrote:




He said, "... the Bible instructed Christian women to be subservient




to their husbands, ..."












So, I don't see a lot of philosophical separation between some Muslims




and some Christians. Both of them are Neanderthal.








The scripture doesn't say to be 'sub--servient' it talks about respect to both husband and wife... Sorry you can't or at least don't want to see that.




Ephesians 5:22-33




New International Version (NIV)




22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord.. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.




25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing[a] her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless.. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church� 30 for we are members of his body. 31 �For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.�[b] 32 This is a profound mystery�but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.




Thanks for correcting the dip****, Tim!




John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!






Context please. Which dip****, John?



--

Americans deserve better.


The spoofer dip****. Kevin has taken and passed the dip**** test about 271 times, ya know. Not that the spoofer's Kevin, but he's pretty close - mentally anyway!
  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Friday, November 29, 2013 9:52:22 AM UTC-6,
The quote is very clear...that wives must *submit* to their husbands.

*Submit* does not mean the same thing as "respect," as you are trying to

claim here. You are making a bull**** claim. Submit means being

subservient.


"The husband is the head of the wife..."


What do you think that means? It means the wife is to do as she is told


You ar3e obviously thinking that 'subjective' is another term for being a 'slave' which is clearly not representitive of the scripture. but you can believe that if you wish.

But speaking of; If that turuly is your way of thinking would this be alright if we changed the wording a bit?

" Citizens, submit yourselves unto your government, as unto the current administration.

For the government is the head of the citizens, even as the administration is the head of the government: and it is the saviour of the body."

subservient? Yeah, I suppose that really *IS* what the term means!

uh-huh.
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Friday, November 29, 2013 11:05:47 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:11:27 -0500, John H.

wrote:



On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 05:53:53 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:




On Friday, November 29, 2013 7:32:47 AM UTC-6, John H's spoofer wrote:




He said, "... the Bible instructed Christian women to be subservient




to their husbands, ..."












So, I don't see a lot of philosophical separation between some Muslims




and some Christians. Both of them are Neanderthal.








The scripture doesn't say to be 'sub--servient' it talks about respect to both husband and wife... Sorry you can't or at least don't want to see that.




Ephesians 5:22-33




New International Version (NIV)




22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.




25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing[a] her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife


loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but

they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church� 30

for we are members of his body. 31 �For this reason a man will leave

his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will

become one flesh.�[b] 32 This is a profound mystery�but I am talking

about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must

love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her

husband.



Thanks for correcting the dip****, Tim!




Tim, first of all, your messages are not being sent through the

servers.



I'm replying to you through this message because both you and John apparently can't read.


Er... "which "John" am I replying to?



I posted: "Southern Baptist Convention's Russell Moore's" words, not

mine. If you have a theological beef it is with the Baptist

Convention, not me.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


I take it you posted that screed so there would be a theological beef, otherwise you would have probably by-passed it...
  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Friday, November 29, 2013 11:28:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:

Tim, the spoofer can't keep his spoofs straight.



Again, thanks for correcting the dip****. Russel Moore is not the leader of Christians, nor did he

write the Bible. Maybe he's just a ****ty interpreter or an outlier like Jeremiah Wright or the

'Rev' Jesse Jackson - both outliers and racists.



John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


Good observation...
  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Friday, November 29, 2013 1:15:21 PM UTC-6, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:04:44 -0500, Hank�

wrote:



On 11/29/2013 10:11 AM, John H. wrote:


On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 05:53:53 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:




On Friday, November 29, 2013 7:32:47 AM UTC-6, John H's spoofer wrote:




He said, "... the Bible instructed Christian women to be subservient




to their husbands, ..."












So, I don't see a lot of philosophical separation between some Muslims




and some Christians. Both of them are Neanderthal.








The scripture doesn't say to be 'sub--servient' it talks about respect to both husband and wife... Sorry you can't or at least don't want to see that.




Ephesians 5:22-33




New International Version (NIV)




22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.




25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing[a] her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church� 30 for we are members of his body. 31 �For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.�[b] 32 This is a profound mystery�but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.




Thanks for correcting the dip****, Tim!




John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!






Context please. Which dip****, John?




I have no idea. I'm so confused I don't know Billy Graham from the

Pope at this point.

Oh that's ok. A lot of people really didn't know who they were voting for, either...

  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?

On Friday, November 29, 2013 5:20:02 PM UTC-6, Tim wrote:

I have no idea. I'm so confused I don't know Billy Graham from the




Pope at this point.




Oh that's ok. A lot of people really didn't know who they were voting for, either...


Poor choice of words. Maybe I should have said 'what' instead of 'who'

oh well...

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Approval ratings not the best... John H[_11_] General 132 December 21st 09 12:59 AM
Water Treatment Jobs | Water Treatment Supplies | Wastewater Plant H2 Find General 0 December 2nd 09 06:59 AM
Lifesling2 approval Tamaroak General 0 February 26th 06 06:32 AM
Lifesling2 approval Tamaroak Cruising 0 February 26th 06 06:32 AM
MORE Angry White Females. Bertie the Bunyip ASA 0 July 31st 03 05:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017